Search Tips

State v. Bruederle

Docket No. 20110179
Oral Argument: Tuesday, January 24, 2012 4:00pm

Docket Info

Title
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
William Cody Bruederle, Jr., Defendant and Appellant
Case Type
CRIMINAL APPEAL : DRUGS/CONTRABAND
Appeal From
Case No. 09-K-00650
South Central Judicial District, Burleigh County
David E. Reich
2012 ND 26809 N.W.2d 833

Highlight

District court orders and amended judgments revoking probation are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), (4), and (7).

Briefs

Filing Date Description
10/13/2011 APPELLANT BRIEF View
11/25/2011 APPELLEE BRIEF View

Counsel

Party Type Name
APPELLANT COURT APPOINTED Kent M Morrow - 03503
APPELLEE ASST. STATE'S ATTORNEY Jacob T. Rodenbiker - 06497

(Note: Attachments may not be available for recently filed cases and/or confidential documents.)

Seq. # Filing Date Description Attachment
1 06/21/2011 NOTICE OF APPEAL : 06/15/2011
2 06/21/2011 ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT : 06/15/2011
3 06/22/2011 This case is consolidated w/20110180. Make all entries in this case except ROA, DIS & MAN.
4 07/09/2011 Acknowledged receipt of OTR & RETENTION OF RECORD ON APPEAL : 08/04/2011
5 08/04/2011 TRANSCRIPTS DATED April 15, 2011 and May 20, 2011 & C.O.S.
6 08/04/2011 DISK - tra (4/15/11 & 5/20/11) (e-mailed)
7 08/08/2011 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL (entry nos. 1-33)
8 09/08/2011 MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF (E-FILED)
9 09/08/2011 E-FILED MOTION (MAT)
10 09/09/2011 ACTION BY CLERK (MAT) - Granted : 10/13/2011
11 10/13/2011 APPELLANT BRIEF View
12 10/13/2011 E-FILED BRIEF - ATB
13 10/13/2011 APPELLANT APPENDIX
14 10/13/2011 E-FILED APPENDIX - ATA
15 10/14/2011 Rec'd $25.00 ATB e-file surcharge. (receipt no. 20711)
16 10/17/2011 Rec'd 7 copies of ATB from Central Duplicating.
17 10/17/2011 Rec'd 6 copies of ATA from Central Duplicating.
18 11/07/2011 MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLEE BRIEF
19 11/07/2011 E-FILED MOTION (MAE)
20 11/07/2011 ACTION BY CLERK (MAE) - Granted : 11/25/2011
21 11/25/2011 APPELLEE BRIEF View
22 11/25/2011 DISK - AEB (e-mailed)
23 11/29/2011 Request to waive oral argument on behalf of the Appellant
24 11/29/2011 E-FILED MOTION
25 12/13/2011 Request to Waive Oral Argument on Behalf of the Appellee
26 12/13/2011 E-FILED MOTION
27 12/15/2011 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT
28 01/11/2012 ACTION BY SUPREME COURT (request to waive argument by Appellant) - Granted
29 01/11/2012 ACTION BY SUPREME COURT (request to waive argument by Appellee) - Granted
30 01/24/2011 APPEARANCES: WAIVED UNDER N.D.R.APP.P. 34(f)
31 01/24/2012 ARGUED: WAIVED UNDER N.D.R.APP.P. 34(f)
32 02/17/2012 DISPOSITION
33 02/17/2012 UNANIMOUS OPINION : Per Curiam View
34 02/22/2012 Judgment Sent to Parties
35 03/15/2012 MANDATE
36 03/16/2012 RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE
37 07/21/2021 EXPUNGED - Nonpermanent record items destroyed