State v. Bruederle
Docket No. 20110179
Oral Argument:
Tuesday, January 24, 2012 4:00pm
Docket Info
- Title
- State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
William Cody Bruederle, Jr., Defendant and Appellant - Case Type
- CRIMINAL APPEAL : DRUGS/CONTRABAND
- Appeal From
-
Case No. 09-K-00650
South Central Judicial District, Burleigh County
David E. Reich
2012 ND 26809 N.W.2d 833
Highlight
District court orders and amended judgments revoking probation are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), (4), and (7).
(Note: Attachments may not be available for recently filed cases and/or confidential documents.)
Seq. # | Filing Date | Description | Attachment |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 06/21/2011 | NOTICE OF APPEAL : 06/15/2011 | |
2 | 06/21/2011 | ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT : 06/15/2011 | |
3 | 06/22/2011 | This case is consolidated w/20110180. Make all entries in this case except ROA, DIS & MAN. | |
4 | 07/09/2011 | Acknowledged receipt of OTR & RETENTION OF RECORD ON APPEAL : 08/04/2011 | |
5 | 08/04/2011 | TRANSCRIPTS DATED April 15, 2011 and May 20, 2011 & C.O.S. | |
6 | 08/04/2011 | DISK - tra (4/15/11 & 5/20/11) (e-mailed) | |
7 | 08/08/2011 | ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL (entry nos. 1-33) | |
8 | 09/08/2011 | MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF (E-FILED) | |
9 | 09/08/2011 | E-FILED MOTION (MAT) | |
10 | 09/09/2011 | ACTION BY CLERK (MAT) - Granted : 10/13/2011 | |
11 | 10/13/2011 | APPELLANT BRIEF | View |
12 | 10/13/2011 | E-FILED BRIEF - ATB | |
13 | 10/13/2011 | APPELLANT APPENDIX | |
14 | 10/13/2011 | E-FILED APPENDIX - ATA | |
15 | 10/14/2011 | Rec'd $25.00 ATB e-file surcharge. (receipt no. 20711) | |
16 | 10/17/2011 | Rec'd 7 copies of ATB from Central Duplicating. | |
17 | 10/17/2011 | Rec'd 6 copies of ATA from Central Duplicating. | |
18 | 11/07/2011 | MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLEE BRIEF | |
19 | 11/07/2011 | E-FILED MOTION (MAE) | |
20 | 11/07/2011 | ACTION BY CLERK (MAE) - Granted : 11/25/2011 | |
21 | 11/25/2011 | APPELLEE BRIEF | View |
22 | 11/25/2011 | DISK - AEB (e-mailed) | |
23 | 11/29/2011 | Request to waive oral argument on behalf of the Appellant | |
24 | 11/29/2011 | E-FILED MOTION | |
25 | 12/13/2011 | Request to Waive Oral Argument on Behalf of the Appellee | |
26 | 12/13/2011 | E-FILED MOTION | |
27 | 12/15/2011 | NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT | |
28 | 01/11/2012 | ACTION BY SUPREME COURT (request to waive argument by Appellant) - Granted | |
29 | 01/11/2012 | ACTION BY SUPREME COURT (request to waive argument by Appellee) - Granted | |
30 | 01/24/2011 | APPEARANCES: WAIVED UNDER N.D.R.APP.P. 34(f) | |
31 | 01/24/2012 | ARGUED: WAIVED UNDER N.D.R.APP.P. 34(f) | |
32 | 02/17/2012 | DISPOSITION | |
33 | 02/17/2012 | UNANIMOUS OPINION : Per Curiam | View |
34 | 02/22/2012 | Judgment Sent to Parties | |
35 | 03/15/2012 | MANDATE | |
36 | 03/16/2012 | RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE | |
37 | 07/21/2021 | EXPUNGED - Nonpermanent record items destroyed |