Search Tips

Perius v. Nodak Mutual Ins. Co., et al.

Docket No. 20110205
Oral Argument: Thursday, January 19, 2012 10:45am

Docket Info

Title
Allen Perius, Plaintiff and Appellant
v.
Nodak Mutual Insurance
Company and Jacob Kessler, Defendants
------------------
Nodak Mutual Insurance Appellee
Company
Case Type
CIVIL APPEAL : PERSONAL INJURY
Appeal From
Case No. 08-C-02143
South Central Judicial District, Burleigh County
Bruce B. Haskell
2012 ND 54813 N.W.2d 580
Oral Argument 1/19/2012

Highlight

Parties must fully, completely, and fairly disclose the subject matter and substance of their expert witnesses' anticipated trial testimony.
The district court may determine a suitable sanction for a party's failure to supplement interrogatories and may exclude expert testimony that is beyond the scope of a party's responses to interrogatories.


Briefs

Filing Date Description
10/20/2011 APPELLANT BRIEF View
11/30/2011 APPELLEE BRIEF (e-filed) View

Counsel

Party Type Name
APPELLEE PRIVATE PRACTICE Mitchell D Armstrong - 05892
APPELLANT PRIVATE PRACTICE Scott Andrew Hager - 05913

(Note: Attachments may not be available for recently filed cases and/or confidential documents.)

Seq. # Filing Date Description Attachment
1 07/15/2011 NOTICE OF APPEAL : 07/13/2011
2 07/15/2011 ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT : 07/13/2011
3 07/20/2011 RETENTION OF RECORD ON APPEAL : 09/01/2011
4 09/01/2011 TRANSCRIPTS DATED April 14, 2011; April 19, 2011; & April 20, 2011 (3 vols.) & C.O.S.
5 09/01/2011 DISK - tra (April 14, 2011; April 19, 2011; & April 20, 2011)
6 09/12/2011 Returned Envelope addressed to Jacob Kessler w/notation that "forward time expired"
7 09/14/2011 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL. Not certified was DVD attached to Entry No. 102
8 09/14/2011 Ltr from court recorder TRA sent to Kessler was returned to sender
9 10/03/2011 Returned Envelope (9/21/11 ltr) addressed to Jacob Kessler w/notation "unable to forward."
10 10/04/2011 MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF (e-filed)
11 10/04/2011 E-FILED MOTION (MAT)
12 10/04/2011 E-mail from Mr. Armstrong indicating no objection to Mot. for Ext. of Time to File ATB.
13 10/04/2011 ACTION BY CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK (MAT) - Granted : 10/20/2011
14 10/20/2011 APPELLANT BRIEF View
15 10/20/2011 APPELLANT APPENDIX
16 10/20/2011 DISK - atb (E-mailed)
17 11/02/2011 Returned Envelope (10/21/11 ltr) addressed to Mr. Kessler @ Oxford, WI returned as forward time exp
18 11/10/2011 MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLEE BRIEF
19 11/10/2011 E-FILED MOTION (MAE)
20 11/10/2011 ACTION BY CLERK - Granted : 12/01/2011
21 11/10/2011 E-mail from Scott Hager stating he does not object to the Extension of Time of Appellee's Brief
22 11/30/2011 APPELLEE BRIEF (e-filed) View
23 11/30/2011 E-FILED BRIEF (AEB)
24 11/30/2011 APPELLEE APPENDIX
25 11/30/2011 E-FILED BRIEF (AEA)
26 12/01/2011 Rec'd $25.00 e-file surcharge for AEB. (receipt no. 20770)
27 12/06/2011 Rec'd 7 copies of AEB from Central Duplicating.
28 12/06/2011 Rec'd 6 copies of AEA from Central Duplicating.
29 12/15/2011 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT
30 01/19/2012 APPEARANCES: Scott Hager/Mitchell Armstrong
31 01/19/2012 ARGUED: Hager/Armstrong
32 01/19/2012 ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST
33 03/15/2012 DISPOSITION
34 03/15/2012 SPLIT OPINION : VandeWalle, Gerald W. View
35 03/15/2012 (CONCURRING SPECIALLY) : Maring, Mary Muehlen
36 03/15/2012 Costs on appeal taxed in favor of Appellee
37 03/16/2012 Judgment Sent to Parties
38 05/02/2012 MANDATE
39 05/07/2012 RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE