Search Tips

State v. Bruederle

Docket No. 20110245
Oral Argument: Tuesday, January 24, 2012 4:00pm

Docket Info

Title
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
William Cody Bruederle, Jr., Defendant and Appellant
Case Type
CRIMINAL APPEAL : MISC. STATUTORY OFFENSE (FELONY)
Appeal From
Case No. 11-K-00471
South Central Judicial District, Burleigh County
Donald L. Jorgensen
2012 ND 23809 N.W.2d 833

Highlight

Criminal judgment after a jury found a defendant guilty of terrorizing a woman and her mother is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1).


Briefs

Filing Date Description
11/14/2011 APPELLANT BRIEF View
12/13/2011 APPELLEE BRIEF View

Counsel

Party Type Name
APPELLANT COURT APPOINTED Kent M Morrow - 03503
APPELLEE ASST. STATE'S ATTORNEY Bryan David Denham - 06331

(Note: Attachments may not be available for recently filed cases and/or confidential documents.)

Seq. # Filing Date Description Attachment
1 08/23/2011 NOTICE OF APPEAL : 08/22/2011
2 08/25/2011 ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT : 08/24/2011
3 09/22/2011 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL (Entry Nos. 1 - 40)
4 10/06/2011 TRANSCRIPT DATED August 9, 2011 & C.O.S.
5 10/06/2011 DISK - tra (8-9-11) (e-mailed)
6 11/14/2011 APPELLANT BRIEF View
7 11/14/2011 E-FILED BRIEF - ATB
8 11/14/2011 APPELLANT APPENDIX
9 11/14/2011 E-FILED APPENDIX - ATA
10 11/15/2011 Rec'd $25.00 ATB e-file surcharge. (receipt no. 20744)
11 11/17/2011 Rec'd 7 copies ATB from Central Duplicating.
12 11/17/2011 Rec'd 6 copies ATA from Central Duplicating.
13 12/15/2011 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT
14 12/13/2011 APPELLEE BRIEF View
15 12/13/2011 APPELLEE APPENDIX
16 12/13/2011 DISK-AEB (E-MAILED)
17 12/15/2011 Request to Waive Oral Argument by Appellant
18 12/15/2011 E-FILED MOTION
19 01/11/2012 ACTION BY SUPREME COURT - Denied
20 01/12/2012 Request to waive oral argument by Appellee
21 01/12/2012 E-FILED MOTION
22 01/12/2012 ACTION BY SUPREME COURT - Granted
23 01/24/2012 APPEARANCES: WAIVED UNDER N.D.R.APP.P. 34(f)
24 01/24/2012 ARGUED: WAIVED UNDER N.D.R.APP.P. 34(f)
25 02/17/2012 DISPOSITION
26 02/17/2012 UNANIMOUS OPINION : Per Curiam View
27 02/22/2012 Judgment Sent to Parties
28 03/15/2012 MANDATE
29 03/16/2012 RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE