Schock v. N.D. Dept. of Transportation
Docket No. 20110254
Oral Argument:
Tuesday, December 6, 2011 4:00pm
Docket Info
- Title
- Paul Alfred Schock, Appellant
v.
North Dakota Department
of Transportation, Appellee - Case Type
- CIVIL APPEAL : TRANSPORTATION DEPT.
- Appeal From
-
Case No. 2011-CV-01084
South Central Judicial District, Mercer County
Bruce B. Haskell
2012 ND 77815 N.W.2d 255
Highlight
Common sense and experience permit an administrative hearing officer to aid in drawing inferences from the evidence presented.
An administrative hearing officer may take official notice of daylight savings time.
The statute requiring a hearing officer to "immediately deliver to the person a copy of the decision," is not basic and mandatory.
(Note: Attachments may not be available for recently filed cases and/or confidential documents.)
| Seq. # | Filing Date | Description | Attachment |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 09/06/2011 | NOTICE OF APPEAL : 09/01/2011 | |
| 2 | 09/07/2011 | DISK - Adm. Agency Hearing Transcript dated 4-8-11 (e-mailed) | |
| 3 | 09/29/2011 | ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL (entry nos. 1-26) | |
| 4 | 10/11/2011 | APPELLANT BRIEF (e-filed) PDF | View |
| 5 | 10/11/2011 | E-FILED BRIEF (ATB) PDF | |
| 6 | 10/11/2011 | APPELLANT APPENDIX (e-filed) | |
| 7 | 10/11/2011 | E-FILED APPENDIX (ATA) | |
| 8 | 10/12/2011 | Received $25 e-filing surcharge for ATB (Receipt #20703). | |
| 9 | 10/17/2011 | Received 7 copies of ATB from Central Duplicating. | |
| 10 | 10/17/2011 | Received 6 copies of ATA from Central Duplicating. | |
| 11 | 11/10/2011 | APPELLEE BRIEF | View |
| 12 | 11/10/2011 | DISK-AEB (E-MAILED) | |
| 13 | 11/16/2011 | NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT | |
| 14 | 11/23/2011 | S.CT. DETERMINED ORAL ARGUMENT NOT NECESSARY | |
| 15 | 11/28/2011 | REPLY BRIEF (e-filed) | View |
| 16 | 11/28/2011 | E-FILED BRIEF (RYB) | |
| 17 | 11/29/2011 | Rec'd 7 copies RYB from Central Duplicating. | |
| 18 | 12/06/2011 | APPEARANCES: Waived under N.D.R.App.P. 34(a) | |
| 19 | 12/06/2011 | ARGUED: Waived | |
| 20 | 04/10/2012 | DISPOSITION | |
| 21 | 04/10/2012 | UNANIMOUS OPINION : Sandstrom, Dale V. | View |
| 22 | 04/10/2012 | Concur in the result : Crothers, Daniel John | |
| 23 | 04/10/2012 | Costs on Appeal taxed in favor of Appellee | |
| 24 | 04/11/2012 | Judgment Sent to Parties | |
| 25 | 04/23/2012 | PETITION FOR REHEARING | View |
| 26 | 04/23/2012 | E-FILED BRIEF (PER) | |
| 27 | 04/24/2012 | Rec'd 7 copies of PER from CSD | |
| 28 | 05/03/2012 | ACTION BY SUPREME COURT - Denied | |
| 29 | 05/14/2012 | MANDATE | |
| 30 | 10/12/2012 | Corrected/Substitute Opinion Pages | |
| 31 | 08/18/2021 | EXPUNGED - Nonpermanent record items destroyed |