Search Tips

Schock v. N.D. Dept. of Transportation

Docket No. 20110254
Oral Argument: Tuesday, December 6, 2011 4:00pm

Docket Info

Title
Paul Alfred Schock, Appellant
v.
North Dakota Department
of Transportation, Appellee
Case Type
CIVIL APPEAL : TRANSPORTATION DEPT.
Appeal From
Case No. 2011-CV-01084
South Central Judicial District, Mercer County
Bruce B. Haskell
2012 ND 77815 N.W.2d 255

Highlight

Common sense and experience permit an administrative hearing officer to aid in drawing inferences from the evidence presented.
An administrative hearing officer may take official notice of daylight savings time.
The statute requiring a hearing officer to "immediately deliver to the person a copy of the decision," is not basic and mandatory.


Briefs

Filing Date Description
10/11/2011 APPELLANT BRIEF (e-filed) PDF View
11/10/2011 APPELLEE BRIEF View
11/28/2011 REPLY BRIEF (e-filed) View

Counsel

Party Type Name
APPELLEE ATT. GENERAL OFFICE Michael Trent Pitcher - 06369
APPELLANT PRIVATE PRACTICE Danny Lee Herbel - 05769

(Note: Attachments may not be available for recently filed cases and/or confidential documents.)

Seq. # Filing Date Description Attachment
1 09/06/2011 NOTICE OF APPEAL : 09/01/2011
2 09/07/2011 DISK - Adm. Agency Hearing Transcript dated 4-8-11 (e-mailed)
3 09/29/2011 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL (entry nos. 1-26)
4 10/11/2011 APPELLANT BRIEF (e-filed) PDF View
5 10/11/2011 E-FILED BRIEF (ATB) PDF
6 10/11/2011 APPELLANT APPENDIX (e-filed)
7 10/11/2011 E-FILED APPENDIX (ATA)
8 10/12/2011 Received $25 e-filing surcharge for ATB (Receipt #20703).
9 10/17/2011 Received 7 copies of ATB from Central Duplicating.
10 10/17/2011 Received 6 copies of ATA from Central Duplicating.
11 11/10/2011 APPELLEE BRIEF View
12 11/10/2011 DISK-AEB (E-MAILED)
13 11/16/2011 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT
14 11/23/2011 S.CT. DETERMINED ORAL ARGUMENT NOT NECESSARY
15 11/28/2011 REPLY BRIEF (e-filed) View
16 11/28/2011 E-FILED BRIEF (RYB)
17 11/29/2011 Rec'd 7 copies RYB from Central Duplicating.
18 12/06/2011 APPEARANCES: Waived under N.D.R.App.P. 34(a)
19 12/06/2011 ARGUED: Waived
20 04/10/2012 DISPOSITION
21 04/10/2012 UNANIMOUS OPINION : Sandstrom, Dale V. View
22 04/10/2012 Concur in the result : Crothers, Daniel John
23 04/10/2012 Costs on Appeal taxed in favor of Appellee
24 04/11/2012 Judgment Sent to Parties
25 04/23/2012 PETITION FOR REHEARING View
26 04/23/2012 E-FILED BRIEF (PER)
27 04/24/2012 Rec'd 7 copies of PER from CSD
28 05/03/2012 ACTION BY SUPREME COURT - Denied
29 05/14/2012 MANDATE
30 10/12/2012 Corrected/Substitute Opinion Pages