Search Tips

Raymond J. German, Ltd. v. Brossart

Docket No. 20110338
Oral Argument: Thursday, February 23, 2012 4:00pm

Docket Info

Title
Raymond J. German, Ltd., Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Rodney Brossart, Defendant and Appellant
Case Type
CIVIL APPEAL : CONTRACTS
Appeal From
Case No. 2011-CV-00045
Northeast Central Judicial District, Nelson County
Lee A. Christofferson
2012 ND 89816 N.W.2d 47

Highlight

When a default judgment, rather than a district court's order regarding a N.D.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion to vacate the default judgment, is appealed, it is reviewed to determine whether irregularities appear on the face of the judgment.
District courts have broad discretion in the quality of proof necessary for entering a default judgment.
An appearance is any response sufficient to give a plaintiff or his or her attorney notice of an intent to contest the claim.


Briefs

Filing Date Description
11/23/2011 APPELLANT BRIEF View
12/21/2011 APPELLEE BRIEF View

Counsel

Party Type Name
APPELLEE PRIVATE PRACTICE Scott David Jensen - 04315
APPELLANT PRO SE Rodney Brossart

(Note: Attachments may not be available for recently filed cases and/or confidential documents.)

Seq. # Filing Date Description Attachment
1 11/23/2011 NOTICE OF APPEAL : 11/23/2011
2 11/28/2011 Corrected Notice of Filing the Notice of Appeal
3 11/23/2011 APPELLANT BRIEF View
4 12/07/2011 DISK - atb (e-mailed)
5 12/07/2011 APPELLANT APPENDIX
6 12/15/2011 Proof of Service of ATB on Mr. German from Rodney Brossart
7 12/21/2011 Notice of Appearance by Scott D. Jensen as counsel for Appellee
8 12/23/2011 Rec'd $25 AEB surcharge. (receipt no. 20797)
9 12/21/2011 APPELLEE BRIEF View
10 12/21/2011 E-FILED BRIEF - AEB
11 12/21/2011 Supplemental APPELLEE APPENDIX of Raymond German
12 12/21/2011 E-FILED APPENDIX - AEA
13 12/27/2011 Electronic RECORD ON APPEAL (entry Nos. 1-25) (NOTE: Entry No. 26 is Clerk's Cert. on Appeal)
14 12/29/2011 Rec'd 7 copies AEB from Central Duplicating
15 12/29/2011 Rec'd 6 copies AEA from Central Duplicating
16 01/18/2012 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT
17 02/16/2012 REQUEST TO WAIVE ORAL ARGUMENT BY APPELLANT
18 02/17/2012 ACTION BY SUPREME COURT - Granted
19 02/21/2012 REQUEST TO WAIVE ORAL ARGUMENT BY APPELLEE
20 02/21/2012 ACTION BY SUPREME COURT
21 02/23/2012 APPEARANCES: Waived under N.D.R.App.P. 34(f)
22 02/23/2012 ARGUED: Waived under N.D.R.App.P. 34(f)
23 05/03/2012 DISPOSITION
24 05/03/2012 UNANIMOUS OPINION : Sandstrom, Dale V. View
25 05/03/2012 Costs on appeal taxed in favor of appellee
26 05/04/2012 Judgment Sent to Parties
27 05/31/2012 MANDATE
28 08/10/2021 EXPUNGED - Nonpermanent record items destroyed