Wenco v. EOG Resources, Inc., et al.
Docket Info
- Title
- Wenco, a North Dakota Limited
Partnership, Plaintiff and Appellant
v.
EOG Resources, Inc., QEP Energy
Company, John Doe Defendants 1-10,
claiming any estate or interest in,
or lien or encumbrance upon, the
property described in numbered
paragraph 29 of the complaint, Defendants
---------------
EOG Resources, Inc., QEP Energy
Company, Appellees - Case Type
- CIVIL APPEAL : REAL PROPERTY
- Appeal From
-
Case No. 10-C-00162
North Central Judicial District, Mountrail County
Todd L. Cresap
Highlight
If a mineral owner who owns a mineral interest subject to an outstanding royalty interest executes a mineral deed with a warranty clause to a party conveying mineral acres or interests in oil, gas and other minerals in and under without any reference to the outstanding royalty interest, the retained mineral interest of the mineral owner alone bears the outstanding royalty if the interest is large enough to satisfy the royalty interest.
Decisions are pronounced by a majority of the Supreme Court.
Although the existence or absence of waiver is generally a question of fact, the issue becomes a question of law if reasonable persons could draw only one conclusion from the circumstances.
Counsel
Party | Type | Name |
---|---|---|
APPELLANT | PRIVATE PRACTICE | David J Hogue - 04486 |
APPELLEE | PRIVATE PRACTICE | Amy Lynn De Kok - 06973 |
APPELLEE | PRIVATE PRACTICE | John W Morrison - 03502 |
APPELLEE | PRIVATE PRACTICE | Lawrence Bender - 03908 |
APPELLEE | PRIVATE PRACTICE | Wade Charles Mann - 05871 |
APPELLEE | PRIVATE PRACTICE | Jillian Rene Rupnow - 06937 |
(Note: Attachments may not be available for recently filed cases and/or confidential documents.)
Seq. # | Filing Date | Description | Attachment |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 04/16/2012 | NOTICE OF APPEAL : 04/11/2012 | |
2 | 05/08/2012 | ELEC. RECORD ON APPEAL (ENTRY NOS.1-93) | |
3 | 05/21/2012 | APPELLANT BRIEF | View |
4 | 05/21/2012 | E-FILED BRIEF | |
5 | 05/21/2012 | APPELLANT APPENDIX | |
6 | 05/21/2012 | E-FILED APPENDIX | |
7 | 05/22/2012 | Received $208.50 surcharge for ATB & ATA (Receipt #21193) | |
8 | 05/24/2012 | MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLEE BRIEF of QEP Energy Company | |
9 | 05/24/2012 | E-FILED MOTION | |
10 | 05/24/2012 | ACTION BY CLERK - Granted : 07/02/2012 | |
11 | 05/30/2012 | Rec'd 7 copies of ATB from CSD | |
12 | 05/30/2012 | Received 6 copies of ATA from CSD | |
13 | 06/20/2012 | APPELLEE BRIEF (EOG) | View |
14 | 06/20/2012 | E-FILED BRIEF | |
15 | 06/20/2012 | APPELLEE APPENDIX (EOG) | |
16 | 06/21/2012 | Received $25 surcharge (Receipt #21228) | |
17 | 06/22/2012 | Received 7 copies of AEB from CSD | |
18 | 06/22/2012 | Received 6 copies of AEA from CSD | |
19 | 07/02/2012 | APPELLEE BRIEF (QEP) | View |
20 | 07/02/2012 | E-FILED BRIEF | |
21 | 07/03/2012 | Received corrected (nonsubstantive) electronic Brief of Appellee QEP | |
22 | 07/05/2012 | Received $25 surcharge for AEB of QEP (Receipt #21241) | |
23 | 07/09/2012 | Received 7 copies of AEB from CSD | |
24 | 07/10/2012 | MOT. EXT/TIME REPLY BRIEF | |
25 | 07/10/2012 | E-FILED MOTION | |
26 | 07/11/2012 | ACTION BY CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK - Granted : 07/31/2012 | |
27 | 08/07/2012 | REPLY BRIEF (pdf) | View |
28 | 08/07/2012 | E-FILED BRIEF | |
29 | 08/09/2012 | Received 7 copies of RYB from CSD | |
30 | 08/09/2012 | NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT | |
31 | 09/05/2012 | APPEARANCES: David J. Hogue; Amy L. DeKok; John W. Morrison, Jr. | |
32 | 09/05/2012 | ARGUED: David J. Hogue; Amy L. DeKok; John W. Morrison, Jr. | |
33 | 09/05/2012 | ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST | |
34 | 10/23/2012 | DISPOSITION | |
35 | 10/23/2012 | SPLIT OPINION : Kapsner, Carol Ronning | View |
36 | 10/23/2012 | Concurring in the result : VandeWalle, Gerald W. | |
37 | 10/23/2012 | Costs on appeal taxed in favor of Appellee | |
38 | 10/24/2012 | Order/Judgment Sent to Parties | |
39 | 11/29/2012 | MANDATE | |
40 | 09/13/2021 | EXPUNGED - Nonpermanent record items destroyed |