Search Tips

Specialized Contracting, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins., et al.

Docket No. 20120195
Oral Argument: Thursday, October 4, 2012 2:45pm

Docket Info

Title
Specialized Contracting, Inc., a
North Dakota corporation, Plaintiff
v.
St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Company,
a foreign insurance company, Defendant and Third Party Plaintiff
v.
City of Valley City, a municipal
corporation, Third Party Defendant, Third Party Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Geo E. Haggart, Inc., Kadrmas, Lee
& Jackson, Inc., North Dakota
corporations, Third Party Defendants
----------
Kadrmas, Lee & Jackson, Inc., a North
Dakota corporation, Appellant
Case Type
CIVIL APPEAL : CONTRACTS
Appeal From
Case No. 07-C-00258
Southeast Judicial District, Barnes County
Jay A. Schmitz
2012 ND 259825 N.W.2d 872
Oral Argument 10/4/2012

Highlight

The statutory rules for interpreting indemnity contracts are included in every indemnity contract unless a contrary intention appears in the contract.
An indemnity contract does not have to specifically state that the statutory provisions do not apply for a contrary intent to appear in the contract.


Briefs

Filing Date Description
07/26/2012 APPELLANT BRIEF View
08/27/2012 APPELLEE BRIEF View
09/06/2012 REPLY BRIEF View

Counsel

Party Type Name
APPELLEE PRIVATE PRACTICE Daniel Lee Gaustad - 05282
APPELLANT PRIVATE PRACTICE Michael J Maus - 03499

(Note: Attachments may not be available for recently filed cases and/or confidential documents.)

Seq. # Filing Date Description Attachment
1 04/16/2012 NOTICE OF APPEAL : 04/16/2012
2 04/16/2012 ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT : 04/16/2012
3 04/25/2012 Acknowledgment of OTR from Brenda Richards
4 05/18/2012 ELEC. RECORD ON APPEAL (ENTRY NOS.1-170,172-173,175-188,190-274,Items not scanned Nos.171,174 &189)
5 05/31/2012 MOT. EXT/TIME TRANSCRIPT
6 05/31/2012 ACTION BY TRIAL COURT - Granted : 06/25/2012
7 06/15/2012 TRANSCRIPTS DATED March 15-18, 2010 (4 volumes) & C.O.S.
8 06/21/2012 DISK-TRA (March 15-18, 2010 - 4 volumes E-MAILED
9 07/20/2012 APPELLANT APPENDIX
10 07/20/2012 E-FILED APPENDIX
11 07/23/2012 Received $25 surcharge for ATB (Receipt #21256)
12 07/26/2012 Rec'd 6 copies of ATA from CSD
13 07/26/2012 APPELLANT BRIEF View
14 07/26/2012 E-FILED BRIEF
15 07/30/2012 Received 7 copies of ATB from CSD
16 08/27/2012 APPELLEE BRIEF View
17 08/27/2012 E-FILED BRIEF
18 08/27/2012 APPELLEE APPENDIX
19 08/27/2012 E-FILED APPENDIX
20 08/29/2012 Received $73.50 e-filing surcharge for AEB & AEA (Receipt #21475)
21 08/30/2012 Received 7 copies of AEB from Central Duplicating
22 08/30/2012 Received 6 copies of AEA from Central Duplicating
23 09/06/2012 REPLY BRIEF View
24 09/06/2012 E-FILED BRIEF
25 09/06/2012 Received 7 copies of RYB from Central Duplicating
26 09/17/2012 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT
27 10/04/2012 APPEARANCES: Michael J. Maus/Daniel L. Gaustad
28 10/04/2012 ARGUED: Maus/Gaustad
29 10/04/2012 ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST
30 12/18/2012 DISPOSITION
31 12/18/2012 UNANIMOUS OPINION : Maring, Mary Muehlen View
32 12/18/2012 Costs on appeal taxed in favor of appellant
33 12/19/2012 Judgment Sent to Parties
34 01/17/2013 MANDATE
35 01/18/2013 RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE
36 09/13/2021 EXPUNGED - Nonpermanent record items destroyed