Search Tips

State v. Goldmann

Docket No. 20120366
Oral Argument: Thursday, March 7, 2013 1:30pm

Docket Info

Title
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellant
v.
Steven Goldmann, Defendant and Appellee
Case Type
CRIMINAL APPEAL : THEFT
Appeal From
Case No. 2012-CR-01750
Northwest Judicial District, Williams County
David W. Nelson
2013 ND 105831 N.W.2d 748
Oral Argument 3/7/2013

Highlight

The State's right to appeal must be expressly granted by statute.
Because the statute does not specifically limit appealability to an order quashing with prejudice, an order dismissing a complaint, information, indictment, or any count, with or without prejudice, is appealable.
For purposes of grading, the amount of a theft is the highest value by any reasonable standard.


Briefs

Filing Date Description
12/14/2012 APPELLANT BRIEF View
02/04/2013 APPELLEE BRIEF View
02/12/2013 REPLY BRIEF View

Counsel

Party Type Name
APPELLANT ASST. STATE'S ATTORNEY Nathan Kirke Madden - 06518
APPELLEE PRIVATE PRACTICE Kevin Joseph Chapman - 05076

(Note: Attachments may not be available for recently filed cases and/or confidential documents.)

Seq. # Filing Date Description Attachment
1 10/01/2012 NOTICE OF APPEAL : 10/01/2012
2 10/02/2012 ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT : 10/01/2012
3 10/29/2012 ELEC. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED OCTOBER 26, 2012 (ENTRY NOS.1-15)
4 11/02/2012 DISK - tra (9-19-12)
5 11/06/2012 TRANSCRIPT DATED September 19, 2012 & C.O.S.
6 12/14/2012 APPELLANT BRIEF View
7 12/14/2012 E-FILED BRIEF
8 12/14/2012 APPELLANT APPENDIX
9 12/14/2012 E-FILED APPENDIX
10 12/17/2012 Received $25 surcharge for ATB (Receipt #21626)
11 12/21/2012 Received corrections to ATA (order of dismissal)
12 12/27/2012 Rcv'd 7 copies of ATB from CSD
13 12/27/2012 Rcv'd 6 copies of ATA from CSD
14 01/10/2013 MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLEE BRIEF
15 01/10/2013 E-FILED MOTION
16 01/11/2013 ACTION BY CLERK - Granted : 02/08/2013
17 02/04/2013 APPELLEE BRIEF View
18 02/04/2013 DISK (AEB)(e-mailed)
19 02/12/2013 REPLY BRIEF View
20 02/12/2013 E-FILED BRIEF
21 02/13/2013 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT
22 02/14/2013 Rcv'd 7 copies of RYB from CSD
23 02/22/2013 REQUEST TO WAIVE ORAL ARGUMENT ON BEHALF OF APPELLEE
24 02/22/2013 E-FILED MOTION
25 02/22/2013 ACTION BY SUPREME COURT - Granted
26 03/04/2013 REQUEST TO WAIVE ORAL ARGUMENT ON BEHALF OF APPELLANT
27 03/04/2013 E-FILED MOTION
28 03/05/2013 ACTION BY SUPREME COURT - Denied
29 03/07/2013 APPEARANCES: Nathan K. Madden; Appellee wavied under N.D.R.App.P. 34(f)
30 03/07/2013 ARGUED: Nathan K. Madden; Appellee waived
31 03/07/2013 ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST
32 03/07/2013 Due to a technical problem, the entire oral argument may not have webcast or recorded
33 06/19/2013 DISPOSITION
34 06/19/2013 UNANIMOUS OPINION : Kapsner, Carol Ronning View
35 06/20/2013 Judgment Sent to Parties
36 07/25/2013 MANDATE
37 07/30/2013