Interest of D.O.
Docket Info
- Title
- In the Interest of D.O., a child
---------
State of North Dakota, Petitioner and Appellee
v.
D.O., Child,
E.O., Mother,
K.O., Father, Respondents
----------
D.O., Child, Appellant - Case Type
- CRIMINAL APPEAL : JUVENILE LAW (Criminal)
- Appeal From
-
Case No. 2013-JV-00105
South Central Judicial District, Burleigh County
John W. Grinsteiner
Highlight
When a defendant argues false or misleading testimony was presented in support of a search warrant, a Franks hearing must be held to determine whether law enforcement omitted facts with the intent or in reckless disregard of whether they were misleading. The affidavit also must not have been sufficient to support probable cause for the search warrant if omitted information had been included.
All information providing probable cause must be considered together, and in a commonsense and realistic fashion.
The right to confrontation is a trial right and does not apply to the same extent in pretrial hearings.
The State must show reasonable grounds exist to transfer a juvenile's case to the district court.
(Note: Attachments may not be available for recently filed cases and/or confidential documents.)
Seq. # | Filing Date | Description | Attachment |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 06/05/2013 | NOTICE OF APPEAL : 05/28/2013 | |
2 | 06/05/2013 | ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT : 05/28/2013 | |
3 | 06/07/2013 | Acknowledgement of Order for Transcript by Sharon Fox | |
4 | 06/27/2013 | ELEC. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED JUNE 26, 2013 (ENTRY NOS. 1-53) | |
5 | 07/11/2013 | AMENDED ELEC. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED JULY 11, 2013 (ENTRY NOS.1-54) (DELETED 5, 6) | |
6 | 07/15/2013 | SECOND AMENDED ELEC. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED JULY 12, 2013 (ENTRY NOS.1-4, 7-56) (DELETED 5,6) | |
7 | 07/17/2013 | TRANSCRIPT DATED MAY 7, 2013 & C.O.S. | |
8 | 07/17/2013 | DISK-Transcript dated May 7, 2013 (e-mailed) | |
9 | 08/27/2013 | MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF | |
10 | 08/27/2013 | E-FILED MOTION | |
11 | 08/27/2013 | ACTION BY CLERK - Granted : 09/11/2013 | |
12 | 09/10/2013 | APPELLANT BRIEF (non-substantive correction to brief signed Sept 12,2013) | View |
13 | 09/10/2013 | E-FILED BRIEF | |
14 | 09/10/2013 | APPELLANT APPENDIX | |
15 | 09/10/2013 | E-FILED APPENDIX | |
16 | 09/11/2013 | Rcv'd $25 surcharge for ATB (receipt #22213) | |
17 | 09/11/2013 | Rcv'd non substantive corrections to ATB & ATA (title) | |
18 | 09/13/2013 | Rcv'd 7 copies of ATB & ATA from CSD | |
19 | 10/02/2013 | APPELLEE BRIEF | View |
20 | 10/11/2013 | Received 8 corrected title pages and C.O.S. & elect copy | |
21 | 10/14/2013 | DISK-AEB (E-MAILED) | |
22 | 10/21/2013 | NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT | |
23 | 11/13/2013 | APPEARANCES: Justin J. Vinje; Christine H. McAllister | |
24 | 11/13/2013 | ARGUED: Justin J. Vinje; Christine H. McAllister | |
25 | 11/13/2013 | ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST | |
26 | 12/19/2013 | DISPOSITION | |
27 | 12/19/2013 | UNANIMOUS OPINION : Crothers, Daniel John | View |
28 | 12/20/2013 | Judgment Sent to Parties | |
29 | 01/13/2014 | MANDATE | |
30 | 01/16/2014 | RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE | |
31 | 02/03/2014 | Corrected Opinion Page - pg. 10, paragraph 28, line 6 | |
32 | 11/02/2021 | EXPUNGED - Nonpermanent record items destroyed |