Search Tips

Dahm v. Stark County Board of County Commissioners

Docket No. 20130238
Oral Argument: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 10:45am

Docket Info

Title
Richard Dahm, Appellant
v.
Stark County Board of
County Commissioners, Appellees
Case Type
CIVIL APPEAL : REAL PROPERTY
Appeal From
Case No. 2012-CV-00716
Southwest Judicial District, Stark County
Zane Anderson
2013 ND 241841 N.W.2d 416
Oral Argument 11/12/2013

Highlight

The decision of a board of county commissioners on whether to approve an application for a zoning change and plat approval will be affirmed unless the board acted arbitrarily or unreasonably, or if there is not substantial evidence supporting the decision.
On appeal from a decision of a county board, a reconsideration of the evidence is limited to the extent that such evidence was presented to the county board, and the burden is on the moving party to show that the decision of the county board was arbitrary, capricious, or unreasonable.
The moving party cannot turn an appeal from a denial of a change in zoning request into an inverse condemnation action.

Briefs

Filing Date Description
09/16/2013 APPELLANT BRIEF (non-substantive correction to brief signed Sept 20, 2013) View
10/21/2013 APPELLEE BRIEF (PDF) View
11/05/2013 REPLY BRIEF View

Counsel

Party Type Name
APPELLANT PRIVATE PRACTICE Lawrence Bender - 03908
APPELLANT PRIVATE PRACTICE Amy Lynn De Kok - 06973
APPELLEE PRIVATE PRACTICE Mitchell D Armstrong - 05892
APPELLANT PRIVATE PRACTICE Jillian Rene Rupnow - 06937

(Note: Attachments may not be available for recently filed cases and/or confidential documents.)

Seq. # Filing Date Description Attachment
1 08/06/2013 NOTICE OF APPEAL : 08/05/2013
2 08/06/2013 DISK-Transcripts of Administrative Agency Hearings dated August 2, 2012, August 30,
3 08/06/2013 2012, and September 4, 2012
4 09/04/2013 ELEC. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED September 3, 2013(ENTRY NOS.1-73)
5 09/16/2013 APPELLANT BRIEF (non-substantive correction to brief signed Sept 20, 2013) View
6 09/16/2013 E-FILED BRIEF
7 09/16/2013 APPELLANT APPENDIX
8 09/16/2013 E-FILED APPENDIX
9 09/17/2013 Rcv'd $185.50 surcharge for ATB & ATA (receipt #22222)
10 09/20/2013 Rcv'd non-substantive corrections to ATB (cite, para #)
11 09/24/2013 Rcv'd additional $1.50 owed for ATA (receipt #22244)
12 09/25/2013 Rcv'd 7 copies of ATB & 6 copies of ATA from CSD
13 10/21/2013 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT
14 10/21/2013 APPELLEE BRIEF (PDF) View
15 10/21/2013 E-FILED BRIEF (PDF)
16 10/21/2013 APPELLEE APPENDIX
17 10/21/2013 E-FILED APPENDIX
18 10/22/2013 Rcv'd $25 surcharge for AEB (receipt #22287)
19 10/22/2013 Rcv'd 7 copies of AEB & 6 copies of AEA from CSD
20 10/23/2013 Rcv'd $3.00 additional surcharge for ATA (receipt #22290)
21 11/05/2013 REPLY BRIEF View
22 11/05/2013 E-FILED BRIEF
23 11/06/2013 Rcv'd 7 copies of RYB from CSD
24 11/12/2013 APPEARANCES: Amy De Kok; Jillian Rupnow; Mitchell D. Armstrong
25 11/12/2013 ARGUED: Amy De Kok; Mitchell D. Armstrong
26 11/12/2013 ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST
27 12/19/2013 DISPOSITION
28 12/19/2013 UNANIMOUS OPINION : VandeWalle, Gerald W. View
29 12/19/2013 Costs on appeal taxed in favor of Appellee
30 12/20/2013 Judgment Sent to Parties
31 01/23/2014 MANDATE
32 02/04/2022 EXPUNGED - Nonpermanent record items destroyed