Dahm v. Stark County Board of County Commissioners
Docket Info
- Title
- Richard Dahm, Appellant
v.
Stark County Board of
County Commissioners, Appellees - Case Type
- CIVIL APPEAL : REAL PROPERTY
- Appeal From
-
Case No. 2012-CV-00716
Southwest Judicial District, Stark County
Zane Anderson
Highlight
The decision of a board of county commissioners on whether to approve an application for a zoning change and plat approval will be affirmed unless the board acted arbitrarily or unreasonably, or if there is not substantial evidence supporting the decision.
On appeal from a decision of a county board, a reconsideration of the evidence is limited to the extent that such evidence was presented to the county board, and the burden is on the moving party to show that the decision of the county board was arbitrary, capricious, or unreasonable.
The moving party cannot turn an appeal from a denial of a change in zoning request into an inverse condemnation action.
(Note: Attachments may not be available for recently filed cases and/or confidential documents.)
Seq. # | Filing Date | Description | Attachment |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 08/06/2013 | NOTICE OF APPEAL : 08/05/2013 | |
2 | 08/06/2013 | DISK-Transcripts of Administrative Agency Hearings dated August 2, 2012, August 30, | |
3 | 08/06/2013 | 2012, and September 4, 2012 | |
4 | 09/04/2013 | ELEC. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED September 3, 2013(ENTRY NOS.1-73) | |
5 | 09/16/2013 | APPELLANT BRIEF (non-substantive correction to brief signed Sept 20, 2013) | View |
6 | 09/16/2013 | E-FILED BRIEF | |
7 | 09/16/2013 | APPELLANT APPENDIX | |
8 | 09/16/2013 | E-FILED APPENDIX | |
9 | 09/17/2013 | Rcv'd $185.50 surcharge for ATB & ATA (receipt #22222) | |
10 | 09/20/2013 | Rcv'd non-substantive corrections to ATB (cite, para #) | |
11 | 09/24/2013 | Rcv'd additional $1.50 owed for ATA (receipt #22244) | |
12 | 09/25/2013 | Rcv'd 7 copies of ATB & 6 copies of ATA from CSD | |
13 | 10/21/2013 | NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT | |
14 | 10/21/2013 | APPELLEE BRIEF (PDF) | View |
15 | 10/21/2013 | E-FILED BRIEF (PDF) | |
16 | 10/21/2013 | APPELLEE APPENDIX | |
17 | 10/21/2013 | E-FILED APPENDIX | |
18 | 10/22/2013 | Rcv'd $25 surcharge for AEB (receipt #22287) | |
19 | 10/22/2013 | Rcv'd 7 copies of AEB & 6 copies of AEA from CSD | |
20 | 10/23/2013 | Rcv'd $3.00 additional surcharge for ATA (receipt #22290) | |
21 | 11/05/2013 | REPLY BRIEF | View |
22 | 11/05/2013 | E-FILED BRIEF | |
23 | 11/06/2013 | Rcv'd 7 copies of RYB from CSD | |
24 | 11/12/2013 | APPEARANCES: Amy De Kok; Jillian Rupnow; Mitchell D. Armstrong | |
25 | 11/12/2013 | ARGUED: Amy De Kok; Mitchell D. Armstrong | |
26 | 11/12/2013 | ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST | |
27 | 12/19/2013 | DISPOSITION | |
28 | 12/19/2013 | UNANIMOUS OPINION : VandeWalle, Gerald W. | View |
29 | 12/19/2013 | Costs on appeal taxed in favor of Appellee | |
30 | 12/20/2013 | Judgment Sent to Parties | |
31 | 01/23/2014 | MANDATE | |
32 | 02/04/2022 | EXPUNGED - Nonpermanent record items destroyed |