Search Tips

State v. Vandermeer

Docket No. 20130265
Oral Argument: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 9:30am

Docket Info

Title
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Christopher Mark Vandermeer, Defendant and Appellant
Case Type
CRIMINAL APPEAL : SEXUAL OFFENSE
Appeal From
Case No. 2012-CR-02671
South Central Judicial District, Burleigh County
Bruce A. Romanick
2014 ND 46843 N.W.2d 686
Oral Argument 2/25/2014

Highlight

As an exception to the hearsay rule, a person may testify as to his or her age and date of birth.
When the criminality of conduct depends on a child's being below the age of fifteen, it is no defense that the actor did not know the child's age, or reasonably believed the child to be older than the age of fourteen.


Briefs

Filing Date Description
12/09/2013 APPELLANT BRIEF & Addendum View
01/06/2014 APPELLEE BRIEF View

Counsel

Party Type Name
APPELLEE ASST. STATE'S ATTORNEY Dawn Marie Deitz - 06534
APPELLANT PRIVATE PRACTICE Michael Ray Hoffman - 04366

(Note: Attachments may not be available for recently filed cases and/or confidential documents.)

Seq. # Filing Date Description Attachment
1 08/28/2013 NOTICE OF APPEAL : 08/23/2013
2 08/28/2013 ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT : 08/23/2013
3 10/04/2013 ELEC. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED October 3, 2013 (ENTRY NOS.1-59)
4 10/09/2013 TRANSCRIPT DATED February 27, 2013, Redacted Text & C.O.S.
5 10/09/2013 DISK-Tra 02/27/13 (e-mailed)
6 11/18/2013 MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF
7 11/18/2013 E-FILED MOTION
8 11/18/2013 ACTION BY CLERK - Granted : 12/09/2013
9 12/09/2013 APPELLANT BRIEF & Addendum View
10 12/09/2013 APPELLANT APPENDIX
11 12/09/2013 DISK (ATB) (e-mailed)
12 01/06/2014 APPELLEE BRIEF View
13 01/06/2014 DISK (AEB) (e-mailed)
14 01/13/2014 REQUEST TO WAIVE ORAL ARGUMENT BY APPELLEE
15 01/21/2014 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT
16 01/22/2014 ACTION BY SUPREME COURT (request to waive oral argument by appellee) - Granted
17 02/25/2014 APPEARANCES: Michael R. Hoffman; Waived by Appellee under N.D.R.App.P. 34(f)
18 02/25/2014 ARGUED: Michael R. Hoffman; Waived by Appellee under N.D.R.App.P. 34(f)
19 02/25/2014 ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST
20 03/11/2014 DISPOSITION
21 03/11/2014 UNANIMOUS OPINION : VandeWalle, Gerald W. View
22 03/12/2014 Judgment Sent to Parties
23 03/17/2014 PETITION FOR REHEARING View
24 03/17/2014 E-FILED BRIEF
25 03/18/2014 Rec'd $25 e-file surcharge for PER (receipt #22694)
26 03/19/2014 Rec'd 7 copies of PER from Central Duplicating
27 04/03/2014 ACTION BY SUPREME COURT - Denied
28 04/11/2014 MANDATE
29 04/15/2014 RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE
30 01/27/2022 EXPUNGED - Nonpermanent record items destroyed