Potratz v. N.D. Dep't of Transportation
- Joseph Daniel Potratz, Appellant
North Dakota Department
of Transporation, Appellee
- Case Type
- CIVIL APPEAL : TRANSPORTATION DEPT.
- Appeal From
Case No. 2013-CV-00617
South Central Judicial District, Burleigh County
Sonna M. Anderson
Repeating the inclusion of the date within the test result portion of an officer's certified report to the Department is not necessary to satisfy the statute.
Inclusion of the percent symbol and BRAC after the numerical test result within the test result portion of a deputy's certified report to the Department does not disqualify an otherwise valid test result that satisfies the statute.
Once an analytical report is accepted by the administrative hearing officer, the burden shifts to the defendant to rebut the prima facie fairness and accuracy of the analytical report.
(Note: Attachments may not be available for recently filed cases and/or confidential documents.)
|Seq. #||Filing Date||Description||Attachment|
|1||10/17/2013||NOTICE OF APPEAL : 10/16/2013|
|2||10/29/2013||DISK-Transcript of Administrative Agency Hearing dated March 15, 2013 (e-mailed)|
|3||11/15/2013||ELEC. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED NOVEMBER 15, 2013 (ENTRY NOS.1-47)|
|4||11/25/2013||Received non-compliant ATB; sent back for corrections. (no statement of facts)|
|7||12/04/2013||APPELLANT BRIEF AND ADDENDUM||View|
|11||01/21/2014||NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT|
|12||02/25/2014||APPEARANCES: Michael R. Hoffman; Michael T. Pitcher|
|13||02/25/2014||ARGUED: Michael R. Hoffman; Michael T. Pitcher|
|14||02/25/2014||ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST|
|16||03/11/2014||UNANIMOUS OPINION : McEvers, Lisa K. Fair||View|
|17||03/11/2014||Costs on appeal taxed in favor of appellee|
|18||03/11/2014||Judgment Sent to Parties|