26th Street Hospitality v. Real Builders, et al.
Docket No. 20150259
Oral Argument:
Monday, January 4, 2016 10:45am
Docket Info
- Title
- 26th Hospitality, LLP, Plaintiff and Appellant
v.
Real Builders, Inc.; Joel J. Feist,
individually and as Managing Partner
of 26th Street Hospitality, LLP;
Joeleon Holdings, LLP; and Solid, LLC, Defendants
----------
Real Builders, Inc.; Joel J. Feist,
individually and as Managing Partner
of 26th Street Hospitality, LLP;
Joeleon Holdings, LLP, Appellees - Case Type
- CIVIL APPEAL : OTHER (Civil)
- Appeal From
-
Case No. 2013-CV-02544
South Central Judicial District, Burleigh County
Bruce A. Romanick
2016 ND 95879 N.W.2d 437
Oral Argument
1/4/2016
Highlight
Under the Federal Arbitration Act, the court is required to determine the validity of an arbitration agreement before arbitration may be ordered, but only if a party specifically challenges the arbitration provision.
Arbitrability is an issue for judicial determination unless the parties clearly and unmistakably provide otherwise.
A nonsignatory to an arbitration agreement may compel arbitration if a signatory raises allegations of substantially interdependent and concerted misconduct by both the nonsignatory and one or more signatories to the contract.
(Note: Attachments may not be available for recently filed cases and/or confidential documents.)
Seq. # | Filing Date | Description | Attachment |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 09/04/2015 | NOTICE OF APPEAL : 09/04/2015 | |
2 | 09/08/2015 | Rec'd $125 filing fee (receipt #23816) | |
3 | 09/08/2015 | NOT. OF FILING NOT. OF APPEAL AND PROOF OF SERV. | |
4 | 09/08/2015 | Notice served on Randall Bakke, Julia J. Douglass and Matthew T. Collins | |
5 | 10/08/2015 | ELEC. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED OCTOBER 7, 2015 (ENTRY NOS.1-203) | |
6 | 10/09/2015 | MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF | |
7 | 10/09/2015 | E-FILED MOTION | |
8 | 10/09/2015 | ACTION BY SUPREME COURT - Granted : 10/21/2015 | |
9 | 10/21/2015 | APPELLANT BRIEF (PDF) | View |
10 | 10/21/2015 | E-FILED BRIEF (PDF) | |
11 | 10/21/2015 | APPELLANT APPENDIX | |
12 | 10/21/2015 | E-FILED APPENDIX | |
13 | 10/23/2015 | Rec'd $25 e-filing surcharge for ATB and $174 for ATA over page limit | |
14 | 10/27/2015 | Rec'd 7 copies of ATB and 6 copies of ATA from Central Duplicating | |
15 | 11/20/2015 | Received non-compliant Appellee Brief - OVER WORD LIMIT | |
16 | 11/20/2015 | APPELLEE APPENDIX (PDF) | |
17 | 11/20/2015 | E-FILED APPENDIX | |
18 | 11/23/2015 | Received $25 AEB e-filing surcharg and $56 overage fee for AEA (Receipt #24099 & 24100) | |
19 | 11/24/2015 | Received compliant Appellee's Brief (Word Count) | |
20 | 11/24/2015 | APPELLEE BRIEF (PDF) | View |
21 | 11/24/2015 | E-FILED BRIEF (PDF) | |
22 | 11/30/2015 | Received 7 copies of the AEB from Central Duplicating | |
23 | 11/30/2015 | Received 6 copies of the AEA from Central Duplicating | |
24 | 12/07/2015 | REPLY BRIEF | View |
25 | 12/07/2015 | E-FILED BRIEF | |
26 | 12/10/2015 | Rec'd 7 copies of RYB from Central Duplicating | |
27 | 12/17/2015 | NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT | |
28 | 01/04/2016 | APPEARANCES: Randall J. Bakke; Bradley N. Wiederholt; Matthew Thomas Collins | |
29 | 01/04/2016 | ARGUED: Randall J. Bakke; Matthew Thomas Collins | |
30 | 01/04/2016 | ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST | |
31 | 05/26/2016 | DISPOSITION | |
32 | 05/26/2016 | UNANIMOUS OPINION : Kapsner, Carol Ronning | View |
33 | 05/26/2016 | costs on appeal taxed in favor of Appellees | |
34 | 05/27/2016 | Judgment Sent to Parties | |
35 | 06/01/2016 | MOTION TO ISSUE MANDATE | |
36 | 06/01/2016 | E-FILED MOTION | |
37 | 06/03/2016 | ACTION BY CHIEF JUSTICE - Granted | |
38 | 06/03/2016 | MANDATE | |
39 | 05/19/2022 | EXPUNGED - Nonpermanent record items destroyed |