State v. Ashby
Docket No. 20160157
Oral Argument:
Thursday, December 15, 2016 10:45am
Docket Info
- Title
- State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellant
v.
Caren Charaye Ashby, Defendant and Appellee - Case Type
- CRIMINAL APPEAL : DRUGS/CONTRABAND
- Appeal From
-
Case No. 2015-CR-00075
Southeast Judicial District, Wells County
James D. Hovey
2017 ND 74892 N.W.2d 185
Oral Argument
12/15/2016
Highlight
To justify stopping a moving vehicle for investigation, a law enforcement officer must have a reasonable and articulable suspicion a motorist has violated or is violating the law.
Whether an officer had a reasonable and articulable suspicion is a fact-specific inquiry that is evaluated under an objective standard considering the totality of the circumstances.
Information from an informant whose identity is easily ascertainable has a higher indicia of reliability than information obtained from a purely anonymous informant.
(Note: Attachments may not be available for recently filed cases and/or confidential documents.)
Seq. # | Filing Date | Description | Attachment |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 04/28/2016 | NOTICE OF APPEAL : 04/28/2016 | |
2 | 04/28/2016 | Statement of Prosecuting Attorney | |
3 | 04/28/2016 | ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT : 05/03/2016 | |
4 | 05/02/2016 | NOT. OF FILING NOT. OF APPEAL AND PROOF OF SERV. | |
5 | 05/02/2016 | Notice served on Kathleen K. Murray and Garrett D. Ludwig | |
6 | 05/27/2016 | ELEC. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED MAY 26, 2016 (ENTRY NOS. 1-105) | |
7 | 06/03/2016 | ELECTRONIC TRANSCRIPT DATED NOVEMBER 25, 2015, JANUARY 20, 2016 & C.O.S. | |
8 | 06/07/2016 | 1ST ELEC. SUPP. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED JUNE 6, 2016 (ENTRY NOS. 106-108) | |
9 | 07/11/2016 | MOTION FOR Enlargement of Appellant Brief (word limit) | |
10 | 07/11/2016 | E-FILED MOTION | |
11 | 07/12/2016 | ACTION BY CHIEF JUSTICE (in part) - Granted | |
12 | 07/11/2016 | MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF | |
13 | 07/11/2016 | E-FILED MOTION | |
14 | 07/12/2016 | ACTION BY CLERK - Granted : 08/12/2016 | |
15 | 07/13/2016 | 2ND ELEC. SUPP. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED JULY 12, 2016 (ENTRY NOS.109-113) | |
16 | 08/11/2016 | APPELLANT BRIEF (PDF) | View |
17 | 08/11/2016 | E-FILED BRIEF (PDF) | |
18 | 08/11/2016 | APPELLANT APPENDIX | |
19 | 08/11/2016 | E-FILED APPENDIX | |
20 | 08/18/2016 | Received $25 ATB e-filing surcharge (Receipt #24585) | |
21 | 08/19/2016 | Received non-substantive corrections to ATB (reference to paragraph number not page) | |
22 | 08/22/2016 | Received 7 copies of the ATB from Central Duplicating | |
23 | 08/22/2016 | Received 6 copies of the ATA from Central Duplicating | |
24 | 09/07/2016 | MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLEE BRIEF | |
25 | 09/07/2016 | E-FILED MOTION | |
26 | 09/07/2016 | ACTION BY CLERK - Granted : 10/10/2016 | |
27 | 09/08/2016 | 3RD ELEC. SUPP. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED SEPTEMBER 8, 2016 (ENTRY NOS.114-115) | |
28 | 10/10/2016 | APPELLEE BRIEF | View |
29 | 10/10/2016 | APPELLEE APPENDIX | |
30 | 10/10/2016 | DISK (AEB)(e-mailed) | |
31 | 10/13/2016 | Rec'd non-substantive correction to AEB (2 paragraphs #34) | |
32 | 11/17/2016 | NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT | |
33 | 11/30/2016 | REQUEST TO RESCHEDULE ORAL ARGUMENT | |
34 | 11/30/2016 | E-FILED MOTION | |
35 | 12/01/2016 | ACTION BY SUPREME COURT - Granted | |
36 | 12/02/2016 | NOTICE OF RESCHEDULED ORAL ARGUMENT SENT | |
37 | 12/15/2016 | APPEARANCES: Kathleen K. Murray; Garrett D. Ludwig | |
38 | 12/15/2016 | ARGUED: Kathleen K. Murray; Garrett D. Ludwig | |
39 | 12/15/2016 | ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST | |
40 | 03/24/2017 | ANNOUNCED DISQUALIFICATION : Tufte, Jerod E. | |
41 | 03/24/2017 | SITTING WITH THE COURT : Sandstrom, Dale V. | |
42 | 03/20/2017 | DISPOSITION | |
43 | 03/30/2017 | UNANIMOUS OPINION : Kapsner, Carol Ronning | View |
44 | 03/31/2017 | Judgment Sent to Parties | |
45 | 04/21/2017 | MANDATE | |
46 | 08/04/2022 | EXPUNGED - Nonpermanent record items destroyed |