Search Tips

Arnegard, et al. v. Arnegard Township

Docket No. 20170242
Oral Argument: Thursday, January 18, 2018 1:30 PM

Docket Info

Title
Cameron Arnegard and Mary Susan Arnegard, Plaintiffs, Appellants, and Cross-Appellees
v.
Arnegard Township, Defendant, Appellee, and Cross-Appellant
Case Type
CIVIL APPEAL : OTHER (Civil)
Appeal From
Case No. 2016-CV-00017
Northwest Judicial District, McKenzie County
Daniel Saleh El-Dweek
2018 ND 80908 N.W.2d 737
Oral Argument 1/18/2018

Highlight

Zoning ordinances and amendments are valid if a township follows the statutory procedures. A conditional use permit does not by itself create a contract between a township and a landowner.
A township has no duty to disclose validly enacted zoning ordinances or amendments beyond the notice and filing procedures provided by statute.Zoning ordinances and amendments are valid if a township follows the statutory procedures. A conditional use permit does not by itself create a contract between a township and a landowner. A township has no duty to disclose validly enacted zoning ordinances or amendments beyond the notice and filing procedures provided by statute. A claim of constitutional due process violation first requires a protected property interest created by an independent source of law.Zoning ordinances and amendments are valid if a township follows the statutory procedures. A conditional use permit does not by itself create a contract between a township and a landowner. A township has no duty to disclose validly enacted zoning ordinances or amendments beyond the notice and filing procedures provided by statute. A claim of constitutional due process violation first requires a protected property interest created by an independent source of law.Zoning ordinances and amendments are valid if a township follows the statutory procedures. A conditional use permit does not by itself create a contract between a township and a landowner. A township has no duty to disclose validly enacted zoning ordinances or amendments beyond the notice and filing procedures provided by statute.Zoning ordinances and amendments are valid if a township follows the statutory procedures. A conditional use permit does not by itself create a contract between a township and a landowner. A township has no duty to disclose validly enacted zoning ordinances or amendments beyond the notice and filing procedures provided by statute.
A claim of constitutional due process violation first requires a protected property interest created by an independent source of law.
A claim of constitutional due process violation first requires a protected property interest created by an independent source of law. A claim of constitutional due process violation first requires a protected property interest created by an independent source of law.


Briefs

Filing Date Description
10/09/2017 APPELLANT BRIEF (PDF) View
11/20/2017 APPELLEE BRIEF (PDF) View
12/07/2017 REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE (PDF) View
12/26/2017 REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLEE/CROSS-APPELLANT (PDF) View

Counsel

Party Type Name
APPELLANT PRIVATE PRACTICE Lisa Marie Six - 07232
APPELLANT PRIVATE PRACTICE Garth H Sjue - 03873
APPELLEE PRIVATE PRACTICE Scott Kenneth Porsborg - 04904
APPELLEE PRIVATE PRACTICE Austin Theodore Lafferty - 07833

(Note: Attachments may not be available for recently filed cases and/or confidential documents.)

Seq. # Filing Date Description Attachment
1 06/28/2017 NOTICE OF APPEAL : 06/28/2017
2 06/28/2017 ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT : 06/30/2017
3 06/29/2017 NOT. OF FILING NOT. OF APPEAL AND PROOF OF SERV.
4 06/29/2017 Notice served on Garth H. Sjue, Lisa M. Six, Scott K. Porsborg, & Brian Schmidt
5 07/21/2017 ELEC. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED JULY 20, 2017 (ENTRY NOS. 1-198)
6 08/29/2017 ELECTRONIC TRANSCRIPTS DATED APRIL 15, 2016, SEPTEMBER 19, 2017,
7 08/29/2017 SEPTEMBER 20, 2016, SEPTEMBER 21, 2017 W/ REDACTION KEY, SEPTEMBER 22, 2017, & C.O.S.
8 10/09/2017 APPELLANT BRIEF (PDF) View
9 10/09/2017 E-FILED BRIEF (PDF)
10 10/09/2017 APPELLANT APPENDIX
11 10/09/2017 E-FILED APPENDIX
12 10/12/2017 Rec'd $207.50 e-filing surcharge for ATB & ATA (receipt #25537)
13 10/13/2017 Rec'd 6 copies of ATB & ATA from CSD
14 10/30/2017 MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLEE BRIEF
15 10/30/2017 E-FILED MOTION
16 10/31/2017 ACTION BY CLERK - Granted : 11/20/2017
17 10/31/2017 NOTICE OF CROSS APPEAL filed in the trial court July 10, 2017
18 10/31/2017 NOT. OF FILING NOT. OF CROSS-APPEAL AND PROOF OF SERV.
19 10/31/2017 Notice served on Garth H. Sjue, Lisa M. Six, Scott K. Porsborg, & Brian Schmidt
20 11/20/2017 APPELLEE BRIEF (PDF) View
21 11/20/2017 E-FILED BRIEF (PDF)
22 11/20/2017 APPELLEE APPENDIX
23 11/20/2017 E-FILED APPENDIX
24 11/21/2017 1ST ELEC. SUPP. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED NOVEMBER 21, 2017 (ENTRY NOS. 199-209)
25 11/22/2017 Rec'd 6 copies of AEB & AEA from CSD
26 11/24/2017 Rec'd $25 e-filing surcharge for AEB (receipt #25614)
27 12/07/2017 REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE (PDF) View
28 12/07/2017 E-FILED BRIEF (PDF)
29 12/08/2017 Rec'd 6 copies of RYB from CSD
30 12/18/2017 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT
31 12/26/2017 REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLEE/CROSS-APPELLANT (PDF) View
32 12/26/2017 E-FILED BRIEF (PDF)
33 12/27/2017 Rec'd 6 copies of ATB and 6 copies of ATA from Central Duplicating
34 01/18/2018 APPEARANCES: Lisa M. Six; Scott K. Porsborg; Austin T. Lafferty
35 01/18/2018 ARGUED: Lisa M. Six; Scott K. Porsborg
36 01/18/2018 ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST
37 03/22/2018 DISPOSITION and Remanded
38 03/22/2018 UNANIMOUS OPINION : Crothers, Daniel John View
39 03/22/2018 By Order of the Court, costs to Arenegard Township
40 03/22/2018 Judgment Sent to Parties
41 04/13/2018 MANDATE