Taszarek, et al. v. Lakeview Excavating, Inc., et al.
Docket No. 20180303
Oral Argument:
Monday, March 11, 2019 10:45 AM
Docket Info
- Title
- Eugene E. Taszarek, Marlys J. Taszarek, Trina E.
Schilling, Steven E. Taszarek, and Michael E. Taszarek, Plaintiffs and Appellees
v.
Lakeview Excavating, Inc., Brian Welken,
German Township, and Dickey County, Defendants
and
Brian Welken, Defendant and Appellant - Case Type
- CIVIL APPEAL : OTHER (Civil)
- Appeal From
-
Case No. 2013-CV-00088
Southeast Judicial District, Dickey County
Daniel D. Narum
2019 ND 168930 N.W.2d 98
Oral Argument
3/11/2019
Highlight
A district court’s decision on whether to pierce a corporation’s corporate veil is heavily fact-specific.
Under N.D.R.Civ.P. 52(a)(1), in an action tried on the facts without a jury, a district court must find the facts specially to allow the reviewing court to adequately understand the basis of the district court’s decision.
Conclusory, general findings do not comply with N.D.R.Civ.P. 52(a), and a finding of fact that simply states a party has failed in or has sustained its burden of proof is inadequate under the rule.
(Note: Attachments may not be available for recently filed cases and/or confidential documents.)
Seq. # | Filing Date | Description | Attachment |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 08/02/2018 | NOTICE OF APPEAL : 08/02/2018 | |
2 | 08/02/2018 | ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT : 08/08/2018 | |
3 | 08/06/2018 | Rec'd $125 filing fee | |
4 | 08/07/2018 | NOT. OF FILING NOT. OF APPEAL AND PROOF OF SERV. | |
5 | 08/07/2018 | Notice served on Douglas W. Gigler and William C. Black | |
6 | 08/08/2018 | NOT. OF FILING NOT. OF APPEAL AND PROOF OF SERV. | |
7 | 08/08/2018 | Notice served on Scott K. Porsborg | |
8 | 08/08/2018 | Scott Porsborg represents German Township and Dickey County but is not a party in this appeal. | |
9 | 08/30/2018 | ELEC. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED AUGUST 29, 2018 (ENTRY NOS. 1 - 347) NOT RECIEVED 99 - 103, 110, 111, | |
10 | 08/30/2018 | NOT RECIEVED ENTRY NO'S 154 & 156 | |
11 | 09/25/2018 | ELECTRONIC TRANSCRIPT DATED MARCH 27, 2018 AND MARCH 28, 2018 & C.O.S. | |
12 | 10/26/2018 | MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF | |
13 | 10/26/2018 | E-FILED MOTION | |
14 | 10/26/2018 | ACTION BY CLERK - Granted : 12/05/2018 | |
15 | 12/05/2018 | APPELLANT BRIEF | View |
16 | 12/05/2018 | E-FILED BRIEF | |
17 | 12/05/2018 | APPELLANT APPENDIX | |
18 | 12/05/2018 | E-FILED APPENDIX | |
19 | 12/07/2018 | Rec'd $25 e-filing surcharge for ATB (receipt #26771) | |
20 | 12/10/2018 | Rec'd 6 copies of ATB & ATA from CSD | |
21 | 12/20/2018 | MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLEE BRIEF | |
22 | 12/20/2018 | E-FILED MOTION | |
23 | 12/21/2018 | ACTION BY CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK - Granted : 02/04/2019 | |
24 | 01/29/2019 | APPELLEE BRIEF | View |
25 | 01/29/2019 | E-FILED BRIEF (PDF) | |
26 | 02/01/2019 | Rec'd $25 surcharge for AEB (receipt #26875) | |
27 | 02/01/2019 | Rec'd 6 copies of AEB from Central Duplicating | |
28 | 02/19/2019 | NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT | |
29 | 03/11/2019 | APPEARANCES: Douglas Gigler/William Black | |
30 | 03/11/2019 | ARGUED: Gigler/Black | |
31 | 03/11/2019 | ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST (technical difficulties) | |
32 | 06/27/2019 | DISPOSITION | |
33 | 06/27/2019 | UNANIMOUS OPINION : VandeWalle, Gerald W. | View |
34 | 06/28/2019 | Judgment Sent to Parties | |
35 | 07/19/2019 | MANDATE |