Munson v. Indigo Acquisition Holdings, LLC, et al.
- Wayne Munson, Plaintiff and Appellant
Indigo Acquisition Holdings, LLC,
Akoya Capital, LLC, and Denny Chandler, Defendants and Appellees
- Case Type
- CIVIL APPEAL : OTHER (Civil)
- Appeal From
Case No. 2018-CV-02693
South Central Judicial District, Burleigh County
James S. Hill
A Stock Purchase Agreement submitted with the defendant’s answer qualifies as a “record” of a transaction under N.D.C.C. § 10-04-06(11).
The district court did not abuse its discretion in waiving issues with service related to an attorney’s failure to designate himself as a service contact in North Dakota’s electronic filing system, Odyssey.
The district court did not abuse its discretion in not allowing the appellant to amend his petition when the appellant did not make a motion to amend, did not indicate what amendments he would propose, nor what the amended complaint would state.
The district court did not err in determining it did not have subject matter jurisdiction over an issue not raised in the complaint.
(Note: Attachments may not be available for recently filed cases and/or confidential documents.)
|Seq. #||Filing Date||Description||Attachment|
|1||01/23/2019||NOTICE OF APPEAL : 01/23/2019|
|2||01/25/2019||Rec'd $125 filing fee|
|3||01/25/2019||NOT. OF FILING NOT. OF APPEAL AND PROOF OF SERV.|
|4||01/25/2019||Notice served on Chad C. Nodland and Charles B. Rogers|
|5||02/20/2019||ELEC. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED FEBRUARY 20, 2019 (ENTRY NOS. 1-89)|
|8||03/08/2019||Rec'd 6 copies of ATB from Central Duplicating|
|9||03/08/2019||Rec'd 6 copies of ATA from Central Duplicating|
|10||03/11/2019||Rec'd e-filing surcharge for ATB/ATA (Receipt No. 26935)|
|11||04/02/2019||Rec'd non-compliant AEB (word count)|
|13||04/09/2019||MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLEE BRIEF|
|14||04/09/2019||ACTION BY CLERK - Granted : 04/08/2019|
|15||04/11/2019||Rec'd 6 copies of AEB from Central Duplicating|
|16||04/15/2019||Rec'd $25 surcharge for AEB (Receipt# 27010)|
|17||04/23/2019||NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT|
|18||04/24/2019||Affidavit of Jason Ausmus under pro hac vice rule Admission to Practice Rule 3.|
|19||04/24/2019||MOTION to Excuse the Appeareance of Charles B. Rogers on behalf of Appellees|
|20||04/24/2019||NOTICE OF RESCHEDULED ORAL ARGUMENT SENT|
|21||04/25/2019||ACTION BY CHIEF JUSTICE - Granted|
|22||04/29/2019||NOTICE OF RESCHEDULED TIME FOR ORAL ARGUMENT SENT|
|23||05/06/2019||APPEARANCES: Chad C. Nodland; Jason R. Amus|
|24||05/06/2019||ARGUED: Chad C. Nodland; Jason R. Amus|
|25||05/06/2019||ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST|
|27||07/30/2019||UNANIMOUS OPINION : VandeWalle, Gerald W.||View|
|28||07/30/2019||Costs on appeal taxed in favor Appellees|
|29||08/02/2019||Judgment Sent to Parties|