Big Pines v. Baker, et al.
- Big Pines, LLC, Plaintiff and Appellant
Biron D. Baker, M.D., and
Biron D. Baker Family Medicine PC, Defendants and Appellees
- Case Type
- CIVIL APPEAL : LANDLORD/TENANT
- Appeal From
Case No. 2018-CV-00351
South Central Judicial District, Burleigh County
William A. Herauf
The primary purpose in interpreting contracts is to ascertain the parties’ intent.
The parties’ intent is ascertained from the writing alone when a contract is unambiguous.
When a term in a contract has only one logical meaning, the term is unambiguous.
A personal guaranty agreement that does not acknowledge or promise to pay an existing debt is not evidence of debt under N.D.C.C. § 28-26-04.
(Note: Attachments may not be available for recently filed cases and/or confidential documents.)
|Seq. #||Filing Date||Description||Attachment|
|1||08/16/2019||NOTICE OF APPEAL : 08/16/2019|
|2||08/19/2019||NOT. OF FILING NOT. OF APPEAL AND PROOF OF SERV.|
|3||08/19/2019||Notice Served on Shawn A. Grinolds, Grant T. Bakke, James W. Martens & Robert V. Bolinske, Jr.|
|4||08/19/2019||Rec'd $125.00 filing fee (receipt # 27345)|
|5||09/16/2019||ELEC. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED SEPTEMBER 13, 2019 (ENTRY NOS. 1-183)|
|8||09/25/2019||Oral Argument Request by Appellant Big Pines, Appellant|
|9||09/26/2019||Not. of Appear. by Mark Western for Appellee's in addition & not in substitution of present counsel|
|10||09/27/2019||Rec'd 6 copies of ATB & ATA from Central Duplicating|
|13||10/29/2019||Rec'd 6 copies of AEB and AEA back from Central Duplicating|
|15||11/08/2019||Rec'd 6 copies of RYB from Central Duplicating|
|16||11/18/2019||NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT|
|17||12/17/2019||APPEARANCES: Grant Bakke/Mark Western and James Martens|
|18||12/17/2019||ARGUED: G. Bakke/M. Western|
|19||12/17/2019||ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST|
|21||03/19/2020||UNANIMOUS OPINION : VandeWalle, Gerald W.||View|
|22||03/19/2020||Costs taxed in favor of Appellant|
|23||03/23/2020||Judgment Sent to Parties|