State v. Hirschkorn
Docket Info
- Title
- State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
John Immanuel Hirschkorn, Defendant and Appellant - Case Type
- CRIMINAL APPEAL : ASSAULT
- Appeal From
-
Case No. 2018-CR-00307
South Central Judicial District, McLean County
David E. Reich
Highlight
A district court’s decision to exclude evidence on the basis it lacks adequate foundation lies within its sound discretion and will not be reversed on appeal absent an abuse of discretion that affected substantial rights.
To authenticate evidence under N.D.R.Ev. 901(a), the proponent must produce evidence sufficient to support a finding that the item is what the proponent claims it is.
The proponent of offered evidence need not rule out all possibilities inconsistent with authenticity or conclusively prove that evidence is what it purports to be; rather, the proponent must provide proof sufficient for a reasonable juror to find the evidence is what it purports to be.
A defendant challenging the sufficiency of the evidence on appeal must show that the evidence, when viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict, reveals no reasonable inference of guilt.
(Note: Attachments may not be available for recently filed cases and/or confidential documents.)
Seq. # | Filing Date | Description | Attachment |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 12/18/2019 | NOTICE OF APPEAL : 12/18/2019 | |
2 | 12/18/2019 | ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT : 12/19/2019 | |
3 | 12/19/2019 | NOT. OF FILING NOT. OF APPEAL AND PROOF OF SERV. | |
4 | 12/19/2019 | Notice Served on Jennifer M. Gooss and Ladd R. Erickson | |
5 | 01/14/2020 | ELEC. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED JANUARY 13, 2020 (ENTRY NOS. 1-120)(Rec'd by U.S. Mail: 88, 90, & 96) | |
6 | 02/07/2020 | 1ST ELEC. SUPP. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED FEBRUARY 6, 2020 (ENTRY NOS. 121 & 122) | |
7 | 02/12/2020 | Electronic Transcript dated June 27, 2019 | |
8 | 02/12/2020 | Electronic Transcript dated June 28, 2019 | |
9 | 02/12/2020 | C.O.S. for Transcripts dated June 27, 2019 and June 28, 2019 | |
10 | 02/12/2020 | Electronic Transcript dated November 18, 2019 | |
11 | 02/12/2020 | C.O.S. for Electronic Transcript dated November 18, 2019 | |
12 | 03/19/2020 | MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF | |
13 | 03/22/2020 | ACTION BY CLERK - Granted : 04/06/2020 | |
14 | 04/06/2020 | APPELLANT BRIEF | View |
15 | 04/06/2020 | Oral Argument Request by Appellant | |
16 | 04/06/2020 | APPELLANT APPENDIX | |
17 | 04/09/2020 | Rec'd 5 copies of ATB and ATA from Central Duplicating | |
18 | 04/09/2020 | Rec'd 8 copies of appendix pages 24 and 47 discs | |
19 | 05/06/2020 | APPELLEE BRIEF | View |
20 | 05/06/2020 | Oral Argument Request by Appellee | |
21 | 05/07/2020 | Rec'd 5 copies of AEB back from Central Duplicating | |
22 | 05/21/2020 | NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT | |
23 | 05/28/2020 | REQUEST TO WAIVE ORAL ARGUMENT ON BEHALF OF APPELLEE | |
24 | 05/28/2020 | ACTION BY SUPREME COURT - Granted | |
25 | 06/08/2020 | APPEARANCES: Jennifer M. Gooss; Appellee waived under N.D.R.App.P. 34(f) | |
26 | 06/08/2020 | ARGUED: Jennifer M. Gooss; Appellee waived under N.D.R.App.P. 34(f) | |
27 | 06/08/2020 | ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST | |
28 | 12/17/2020 | DISPOSITION | |
29 | 12/17/2020 | UNANIMOUS OPINION : Tufte, Jerod E. | View |
30 | 12/18/2020 | Judgment | |
31 | 01/13/2021 | MANDATE | |
32 | 03/08/2021 | RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE |