A. Did the district court err by allowing a Summary Real Property Distribution Judgment be entered when the statutory requirement that real property be first described in a judgment and decree of divorce mandated by N.D.C.C. § 14-05-24.2 had not been satisfied, and Steven Mark Orwig’s attorney falsely asserts it was included in his expert appraiser’s report?
B. Did the district court err by allowing amendment of a final judgment without timely compliance with requirements of N.D.R.Civ.P. 60, to include grounds for modification or relief?
C. Did the district court deny due process of law by allowing the divestiture of Mary C. “Marcy” Orwig’s vested real property interest affirmed on appeal in Orwig v. Orwig, 2021 ND 33, ¶¶ 1, 45, 50, 955 N.W.2d 34?
D. Did the district court err by verbally granting Marcy a money judgment, but failing to execute any documents or issue directives to the Clerk of Court implementing such decision?
E. Did the district court err by failing to issue its order of contempt against Steven Mark Orwig for failure to timely pay $105,000 (plus accrued interest) for Marcy’s attorney fees, a $105,000 obligation owed by Steven Mark Orwig to each set of lawyers ratified by the district court after remand on May 5, 2021, and never appealed by Steven Mark Orwig?
F. Did the district court err by allowing off-set against Marcy’s attorney fees of $105,000, a legal remedy which had earlier proposed by Steven Mark Orwig by a Motion for Contempt dated April 15, 2020, but been rejected by the district court, and never appealed by Steven Mark Orwig?
G. Did the district court err by allowing redistribution of property and debt after final judgment, and without evidence of Marcy’s wrongdoing?
H. Did the district court err by allowing $24,000 off-set for a company vehicle under company control?
I. Did the district court err or show prejudice by failing to fully act upon Marcy’s Rule 3.2 Motion for Money Judgment/execution when Steven Mark Orwig had failed to respond thereby admitting the motion is meritorious under N.D.R.Ct. 3.2?
J. Did the district court err by disallowing Marcy post-judgment interest at the original judgment rate?
K.. Did the district court err (a) by allowing annual changes to post-judgment interest, and (b) in its calculations as to the amount due?
L. Did the District Court err by not requiring adherence to judicial procedures with respect to entry of money judgments?

[¶1] Did the District Court err when it entered the Summary Real Estate Disposition Judgment?
[¶2] Did the District Court err when it entered an Order for the Redistribution of Property?
[¶3] Did the District Court abuse its discretion when it denied Marcy’s Motion to hold Steve in contempt?
[¶4] Did the District Court err when it failed to subtract the value of the Dodge Challenger from the attorney fees Steve owes to Marcy?
[¶5] Is Steve entitled to his attorney’s fees?