Isac v. State
Docket Info
- Title
- Sidhassan Yaqub-Sharif Isac, Petitioner and Appellant
v.
State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee - Case Type
- CIVIL APPEAL : POST-CONVICTION RELIEF
- Appeal From
-
Case No. 2022-CV-02931
East Central Judicial District, Cass County
Susan Lynne Bailey
Highlight
When a post-conviction relief applicant seeks to withdraw a guilty plea based upon ineffective assistance of counsel, the applicant must satisfy a two-prong test by showing (1) his counsel’s representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness, and (2) there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s errors, the applicant would not have pleaded guilty and would have insisted on going to trial. Under the second prong, the district court is required to determine what the applicant would have done had he received competent advice—not what he would have done with the benefit of hindsight.
Witnesses must testify from personal knowledge. Witnesses may use notes to refresh their recollection, but they may not testify directly from the notes. A district court has broad discretion to control the use of evidence to refresh memory.
(Note: Attachments may not be available for recently filed cases and/or confidential documents.)
Seq. # | Filing Date | Description | Attachment |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 04/10/2023 | NOTICE OF APPEAL : 04/10/2023 | View |
2 | 04/10/2023 | ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT : 04/10/2023 | View |
3 | 04/10/2023 | NOT. OF FILING NOT. OF APPEAL AND PROOF OF SERV. | View |
4 | 04/10/2023 | Notice Served on Kiara C. Kraus-Parr & Kara S. Olson | |
5 | 04/26/2023 | All Transcripts Filed in Record | |
6 | 05/12/2023 | ELEC. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED MAY 10, 2023 (ENTRY NOS. 1-11, 13-30) (SENT ITEM: 12) | View |
7 | 05/12/2023 | AMD ELEC. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED MAY 10, 2023 (ENTRY NOS. 1-11, 13-18, 20-31) (SENT ITEMS: 12 & 19) | View |
8 | 05/12/2023 | ELEC. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED MAY 10, 2023 (ENTRY NOS. 1-61) (UNDERLYING CRIMINAL) | View |
9 | 06/05/2023 | APPELLANT BRIEF | View |
10 | 06/06/2023 | Oral Argument Request by Appellant | |
11 | 06/06/2023 | Rec'd corrections to ATB (jmt date and section heading) | |
12 | 06/07/2023 | Rec'd 3 copies of ATB from CSD | |
13 | 07/05/2023 | APPELLEE BRIEF | View |
14 | 07/06/2023 | Oral Argument Request by Appellee | |
15 | 07/11/2023 | Consent of Kara S. Olson for Avinoor Mann, law student, was received | View |
16 | 07/13/2023 | Rec'd 3 copies of AEB from CSD | |
17 | 07/28/2023 | NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT | |
18 | 09/06/2023 | APPEARANCES: Kiara C. Kraus-Parr, Kara S. Olson and Avinoor Mann, law student | |
19 | 09/06/2023 | ARGUED: Kiara C. Kraus-Parr and Avinoor Mann, law student | |
20 | 09/06/2023 | ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST | |
21 | 09/28/2023 | DISPOSITION | |
22 | 09/28/2023 | UNANIMOUS OPINION : Crothers, Daniel John | View |
23 | 09/28/2023 | Judgment | View |