Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
2801 - 2810 of 12364 results
State v. Reddig
2016 ND 39
Highlight: A defendant may not be convicted upon the testimony of an accomplice unless the testimony is corroborated by other evidence tending to connect the defendant with the commission of the crime. |
Sand v. Job Service, et al.
2016 ND 38
Highlight: N.D.R.Civ.P. 59 and 60 are not applicable to an administrative agency appeal to a district court. |
Desert Partners IV, L.P., et al. v. Benson, et al. (cross-reference w/20140066)
2016 ND 37
Highlight: An unrecorded instrument is valid between the parties to the instrument and those with notice. |
Dieterle v. Dieterle n/k/a Hansen (cross-reference w/20120329 & 20150030)
2016 ND 36
Highlight: An appellant may not collaterally attack an earlier unappealed decision. |
State v. Goodale
2016 ND 35
Highlight: When a default judgment is entered, the defendant may move for relief from the default judgment under N.D.R.Civ.P. 60(b). |
Haag v. Haag
2016 ND 34
Highlight: A material change of circumstances is an important new fact not known at the time of the prior order establishing residential responsibility. |
Erickson v. Olsen, et al. (cross-reference w/ 20130217)
2016 ND 33 Highlight: Under N.D.R.Civ.P. 60(a), a court may correct a clerical mistake or mistake arising from oversight or omission when one is found in a judgment, but may not make substantive changes in a judgment. |
Estate of Vaage
2016 ND 32
Highlight: Evidence justifying reformation of a written instrument must be clear, specific, and convincing. |
State v. McClary
2016 ND 31
Highlight: A motion to correct an illegal sentence brought under the Rules of Criminal Procedure or brought under the Uniform Postconviction Procedure Act should be treated as equivalent to a motion under both provisions. |
Black Gold Oil Field Services, LLC v. City of Williston, et al.
2016 ND 30
Highlight: Granting or denying a preliminary injunction is based on: (1) substantial probability of succeeding on the merits; (2) irreparable injury; (3) harm to other interested parties; and (4) effect on the public interest. |