Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
4711 - 4720 of 12403 results
State v. Gill (consolidated with 20070365 & 20070366)
2008 ND 152
Highlight: The scope of the community caretaking function does not extend to include officers' entry into private residences. |
Disciplinary Board v. Fisher
2008 ND 151 Highlight: Interim suspention of lawyer ordered. |
Hutchinson v. Boyle (Consolidated w/20080010)
2008 ND 150
Highlight: Disorderly conduct does not include constitutionally protected activity. |
Strand, et al. v. Cass County, et al. (Cross-Ref. w/20050380)
2008 ND 149
Highlight: When a party requests attorney's fees under N.D.C.C. 28-26-01(2), the court must first determine whether a claim is frivolous. If it determines the claim is frivolous, the court must then award reasonable attorney's fees to the prevailing party. |
Estate of Conley
2008 ND 148
Highlight: North Dakota recognizes the common law presumption that a lost or missing will is presumed to be revoked by the testator. |
Weigel, et al. v. Lee, et al.
2008 ND 147 Highlight: A decedent's children are able to seek recovery of non-economic damages in a wrongful death action. |
State v. Scholes
2008 ND 146
Highlight: The validity of a search warrant is reviewed using the totality-of-the-circumstances approach, considering all of the information for probable cause together and testing affidavits executed in support of a warrant in a commonsense and realistic fashion. |
State v. Rivet (Consolidated w/ 20080011)
2008 ND 145
Highlight: Prosecutor's use of a defendant's post-arrest silence after receiving Miranda warnings to impeach a defendant's exculpatory story, told for the first time at trial, violates the defendant's right to due process. |
Estate of Thompson
2008 ND 144
Highlight: The existence of an oral contract is a question of fact. |
Klose v. State (Cross-Ref. with 20010309 and 20050044)
2008 ND 143
Highlight: Summary dismissal of an application for post-conviction relief is appropriate if there are no genuine issues of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. |