Search Tips

Opinions

On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.

1021 - 1030 of 12359 results

Dixon v. Dixon 2022 ND 90
Docket No.: 20210294
Filing Date: 4/28/2022
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Probate, Wills, Trusts
Author: Per Curiam

Matter of Emelia Hirsch Trust 2022 ND 89
Docket No.: 20210324
Filing Date: 4/28/2022
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Probate, Wills, Trusts
Author: McEvers, Lisa K. Fair

Highlight: A district court pre-filing order against vexatious litigant under N.D. Sup. Ct. Admin. R. 58 is reviewed for an abuse of discretion.

A pre-filing order under N.D. Sup. Ct. R. 58 must be issued by the presiding judge of a judicial district, and the district court abuses its discretion if a pre-filing order is issued by any other judge.

Orders denying leave to file new motions or documents are not appealable.

If a court does not rule on a motion, it may be deemed denied.

An award of attorney’s fees and double costs on appeal is granted for frivolous arguments.

Matter of Emelia Hirsch Trust 2022 ND 89
Docket No.: 20210324
Filing Date: 4/28/2022
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Probate, Wills, Trusts
Author: McEvers, Lisa K. Fair

Eckroth v. Eckroth, et al. 2022 ND 88
Docket No.: 20220007
Filing Date: 4/28/2022
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: An order denying a motion to modify primary residential responsibility and an order denying a motion for reconsideration are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (7).

Eckroth v. Eckroth, et al. 2022 ND 88
Docket No.: 20220007
Filing Date: 4/28/2022
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Per Curiam

Trenton Indian Housing Authority v. Poitra, et al. 2022 ND 87
Docket No.: 20210302
Filing Date: 4/28/2022
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Landlord/Tenant
Author: Jensen, Jon J.

Highlight: This Court adopts the two-part review articulated by the United States Supreme Court in Alaska v. Native Village of Venetie Tribal Government, 522 U.S. 520 (1998) to determine whether land is a dependent Indian community and therefore Indian country.

The party challenging the state district court’s jurisdiction has the burden to prove the district court lacks jurisdiction.

A contractual provision, in itself, cannot establish subject matter jurisdiction with the tribal court.

Trenton Indian Housing Authority v. Poitra, et al. 2022 ND 87
Docket No.: 20210302
Filing Date: 4/28/2022
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Landlord/Tenant
Author: Jensen, Jon J.

Sauvageau, et al. v. Bailey, et al. 2022 ND 86
Docket No.: 20220080
Filing Date: 4/28/2022
Case Type: Original Proceeding - Civil - Writ of Supervision
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: This Court exercises its supervisory authority rarely and cautiously, and only to rectify errors and prevent injustice in extraordinary cases when no adequate alternative remedy exists.

Quick take eminent domain offers a property owner less protection because the condemnor can take possession of the property before trial on the amount of just compensation due.

A water resource district may acquire an easement for a right of way for flood control projects by quick take eminent domain.

Sauvageau, et al. v. Bailey, et al. 2022 ND 86
Docket No.: 20220080
Filing Date: 4/28/2022
Case Type: Original Proceeding - Civil - Writ of Supervision
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Energy Transfer, et al. v. ND Private Investigative and Security Bd., et al. 2022 ND 85
Docket No.: 20210244
Filing Date: 4/28/2022
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Administrative Proceeding
Author: Tufte, Jerod E.

Highlight: A person has standing to appeal from an order denying intervention.

The mere fact that the parties have reached a settlement agreement is not itself sufficient to deny a motion to intervene relating to issues collateral to the settlement agreement.

An administrative agency has statutory authority to issue a protection order if the agency acts as an administrative hearing officer.

A document subject to open records laws may be withheld from disclosure if the document or parts of the document fall within a statutory exemption.

Page 103 of 1236