Opinions

Rummer v. State (Cross-reference w/19950324) 2006 ND 216
Docket No.: 20050341
Filing Date: 10/17/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: The petitioner has the burden of establishing grounds for post-conviction relief.
In order to prevail on a post-conviction claim for ineffective assistance of counsel, the petitioner has the heavy burden of proving: (1) counsel's representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness, and (2) the defendant was prejudiced by counsel's deficient performance.
To establish a Brady violation, the defendant must prove: (1) the government possessed evidence favorable to the defendant; (2) the defendant did not possess the evidence and could not have obtained it with reasonable diligence; (3) the prosecution suppressed the evidence; and (4) a reasonable probability exists that the outcome of the proceedings would have been different if the evidence had been disclosed.
A foreign-national criminal defendant may waive any right to consular notification by failing to timely raise the issue.

Livinggood v. Balsdon 2006 ND 215
Docket No.: 20060130
Filing Date: 10/17/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Real Property
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: On remand, a district court may, unless otherwise specified, make its decision on the basis of the evidence already before it or may take additional evidence. The decision on taking additional evidence will be reversed only if the district court abuses its discretion.
Forcible ejectment or exclusion from real property is a conclusion of law fully reviewable on appeal.
Forcible ejectment from real property does not require the actual application of physical force; rather, it is enough if it is present and threatened, and is justly to be feared. This standard requires only that the plaintiff had reason to believe that he would be put out by the application of physical force if he did not obey.
The appropriate standard of review in an appeal challenging a district court's award of damages in a bench trial is whether the district court's findings of fact on damages are clearly erroneous.
A district court must award treble damages if it concludes that one person forcibly ejected or excluded another from real property.

Eichhorn v. The Waldo Township Bd. of Supervisors, et al. 2006 ND 214
Docket No.: 20050295
Filing Date: 10/17/2006
Case Type: Original Proceeding - Civil - Writ of Mandamus
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: Intervention is appropriate when the intervenor claims an interest relating to the property or transaction that is the subject of the action and that the disposition of the action may as a practical matter impair or impede the intervenor's ability to protect that interest, unless the interest is adequately represented by existing parties.
A party seeking a writ of mandamus must show that there is a "clear legal right" to performance of the particular act sought to be compelled by the writ and that there is no other plain, speedy, and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law.
North Dakota statutes envision cooperation between townships and water resource district boards.

Witzke v. Gonzales 2006 ND 213
Docket No.: 20060155
Filing Date: 10/17/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Torts (Negligence, Liab., Nuis.)
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: A civil action is commenced by the service of a summons.
Absent personal jurisdiction, the court is powerless to do anything beyond dismissing without prejudice.

State v. Ebel (Consolidated w/20050441-20050443) 2006 ND 212
Docket No.: 20050440
Filing Date: 10/17/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Drugs/Contraband
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: The Court looks at the "totality of the circumstances" on appeal, giving deference to the district court's findings, to determine whether a search warrant was supported by probable cause.
An evidentiary hearing on whether false statements were provided to support the issuance of a search warrant is only required where: (1) a defendant makes a substantial preliminary showing, accompanied by an offer of proof, that false statements were made in support of a search warrant, either knowingly and intentionally or with reckless disregard for the truth, and (2) the allegedly false statements are necessary to a finding of probable cause.

State v. Sevigny 2006 ND 211
Docket No.: 20050315
Filing Date: 10/17/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Sexual Offense
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: Evidence of an alibi defense may be excluded if a defendant fails to give sufficient notice of his intent to present evidence of an alibi.
A defendant has a right to give testimony about an alibi, even if the defendant fails to give notice of the defense and all alibi evidence is excluded.
A district court must make sufficient findings of fact when admitting or excluding testimony about a child's out-of-court statements about sexual abuse.
A district court has wide discretion over the mode and order of interrogating witnesses and presenting evidence.
Intentional disobedience of a court order constitutes contempt.

Interest of T.A., et al. (CONFIDENTIAL) 2006 ND 210
Docket No.: 20060063
Filing Date: 10/17/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Juvenile - Termination of Parental Rights
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: To terminate parental rights, the petitioner must prove three elements by clear and convincing evidence: (1) the child is a deprived child, (2) the conditions and causes of the deprivation are likely to continue or will not be remedied, and (3) that by reason thereof the child is suffering or will probably suffer serious physical, mental, moral, or emotional harm.
To prove deprivation is likely to continue or will not be remedied, the petitioner cannot rely on past deprivation alone, but must provide prognostic evidence, demonstrating the deprivation will continue.

State v. Odom 2006 ND 209
Docket No.: 20060106
Filing Date: 10/17/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Drugs/Contraband
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: Warrantless searches are unreasonable unless they fall within a recognized exception to the warrant requirement. Consent is an exception to the warrant requirement. The scope of an individual's consent is determined by considering what an objectively reasonable person would have understood the consent to include. The scope of a search is generally defined by its expressed object.
When general consent is given to search a room, no limitations are placed on the consent, the consent is not withdrawn, and the expressed object of the search is known, a police officer can reasonably search locked or closed containers within the room without a warrant.

Forbes v. Workforce Safety & Ins., et al. 2006 ND 208
Docket No.: 20050431
Filing Date: 10/17/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Administrative - Workers Compensation
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: In an administrative appeal, the Court determines only whether a reasoning mind reasonably could have determined that the factual conclusions reached were proved by the weight of the evidence from the entire record.
To trigger the civil penalties for making a false statement in connection with a claim for WSI benefits, WSI must prove: (1) there is a false claim or statement; (2) the false claim or statement is willfully made; and (3) the false claim or statement is made in connection with any claim or application for benefits.
Based upon the civil penalty sought, there are two tests to determine the "materiality of a false statement." If WSI seeks reimbursement for benefits paid, the level of materiality required is proof by WSI that the false claim or false statement caused the benefits to be paid in error. If WSI seeks only forfeiture of future benefits, however, no such causal connection is required.

City of Bismarck v. Perusquia 2006 ND 207
Docket No.: 20060048
Filing Date: 10/17/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - DUI/DUS/APC
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A conviction for driving under the influence is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

Jangula v. Jangula (Cross-Ref. w/20050070) 2006 ND 206
Docket No.: 20060168
Filing Date: 10/17/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Divorce - Property
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A district court's property division in a divorce is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

City of Jamestown v. Rethemeier (Consolidated w/20060100) 2006 ND 205
Docket No.: 20060099
Filing Date: 10/17/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Misdemeanor
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Denial of motion to suppress and judgment of conviction is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

Lee v. Buehner, et al. 2006 ND 204
Docket No.: 20060052
Filing Date: 10/17/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Personal Injury
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A judgment awarding damages in a personal injury action is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (7).

Ernst v. State 2006 ND 203
Docket No.: 20060108
Filing Date: 10/17/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Denial of application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1), (6), and (7).

Thurn v. Workforce Safety and Insurance, et al. 2006 ND 202
Docket No.: 20060092
Filing Date: 10/17/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Administrative - Workers Compensation
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: An order of Workforce Safety and Insurance denying workers compensation benefits is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(5).

State v. DeGroot 2006 ND 201
Docket No.: 20050408
Filing Date: 10/17/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Theft
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Conviction of theft of property summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

State v. Jackson (cross-ref. w/940199) 2006 ND 200
Docket No.: 20060034
Filing Date: 10/17/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - DUI/DUS/APC
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Conviction of driving under suspension summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (4).

Interest of K.S., et al. (Consolidated w/20050398) CONFIDENTIAL 2006 ND 199
Docket No.: 20050397
Filing Date: 10/17/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Juvenile - Termination of Parental Rights
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Order terminating parental rights summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

Sandberg v. American Family Ins. 2006 ND 198
Docket No.: 20050396
Filing Date: 9/14/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Insurance
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: The requirements of a statute may become part of an insurance policy.
An insured's unauthorized settlement with Workforce Safety and Insurance does not adversely affect an insurer, because the settlement does not affect the insurer's right to a reduction in damages payable to the insured for uninsured motorist coverage by the amount paid or payable for workers' compensation benefits.
An amount is payable for workers' compensation benefits if it would have been paid to the workers' compensation claimant.

Stenvold v. Workforce Safety & Insurance, et al. 2006 ND 197
Docket No.: 20050344
Filing Date: 9/14/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Administrative - Workers Compensation
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: An administrative agency generally may not consider evidence which has not been offered, admitted, and made a part of the official record of the administrative proceeding.
The district court's appellate review of an administrative agency decision is limited to the agency record filed with the court.

State v. Graf (Consolidated w/20050411-20050417) 2006 ND 196
Docket No.: 20050410
Filing Date: 9/13/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Drugs/Contraband
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: Warrantless searches inside an individual's home are presumptively unreasonable, but searches inside an individual's home are not unreasonable if the search falls under one of the well-delineated exceptions to the warrant requirement.
Consent to search is an exception to the warrant requirement.
Consent to search purges the taint of prior unlawful police activity if the consent was voluntary under the totality of the circumstances and if the taint of the prior unlawful activity is purged, considering the temporal proximity between the illegal search and the consent, the presence of intervening circumstances, and the purpose and flagrancy of the official misconduct.
Consultation with an attorney may purge the taint of prior unlawful police activity.

Industrial Commission v. Noack 2006 ND 195
Docket No.: 20060067
Filing Date: 9/13/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Contracts
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: An appellant has the duty to provide a transcript sufficient to allow a meaningful and intelligent review of the alleged errors.
To justify rescission of a contract, a mutual mistake must relate to the subject matter and essential elements of the contract, and not merely be collateral to it.
A party seeking to rescind a contract must offer to restore to the other party everything of value which the rescinding party received from the other party under the contract.

Ellis v. Disciplinary Board 2006 ND 194
Docket No.: 20060081
Filing Date: 9/13/2006
Case Type: Discipline - Attorney - Original Proceeding
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Disciplinary proceedings against lawyers, including reinstatement proceedings, are reviewed de novo on the record.
After a lengthy suspension, a lawyer may be required to retake and pass the bar examination as a condition of reinstatement.

State v. Iverson 2006 ND 193
Docket No.: 20060097
Filing Date: 9/13/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Homicide
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: A statute authorizing credit for time served in custody cannot be retroactively applied after a person has been finally convicted.

State v. Schmidkunz 2006 ND 192
Docket No.: 20050141
Filing Date: 9/13/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Homicide
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: In controlling the scope of closing argument, the district court is vested with discretion, and absent a clear showing of an abuse of discretion, we will not reverse on grounds the prosecutor exceeded the scope of permissible closing argument. Unless the error is fundamental, a defendant must demonstrate a prosecutor's comments during closing argument were improper and prejudicial.
Testimony in the form of an opinion or inference otherwise admissible is not objectionable because it embraces an ultimate issue to be decided by the trier of fact.
The district court has broad discretion over the conduct of a trial, including scheduling the time for jury deliberations. The court must exercise its discretion in a manner that best comports with substantial justice.

Leet, et al. v. City of Minot 2006 ND 191
Docket No.: 20060011
Filing Date: 9/13/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Personal Injury
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: For recreational use immunity statutes to apply, a person's presence on the landowner's property open for public recreation must be for "recreational purposes," which includes any activity engaged in for the purpose of exercise, relaxation, pleasure, or education.
A vendor's employee who was present at the City's auditorium for purposes of his employment is not engaged in any activity for the purpose of exercise, relaxation, pleasure, or education.

Strand, et al. v. Cass County, et al. 2006 ND 190
Docket No.: 20050380
Filing Date: 8/28/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Real Property
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: Jury instructions are reviewed to determine whether, as a whole, they fairly and adequately advised the jury of the applicable law.
A local government body may only be held liable for constitutional violations which result from a policy or custom of the government body.
A district court abuses its discretion when it fails to address nonfrivolous issues presented to the court.

Tibert, et al. v. City of Minto 2006 ND 189
Docket No.: 20050393
Filing Date: 8/28/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Real Property
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: A decision of a local governing body will be affirmed on appeal unless the local governing body acted arbitrarily, capriciously, or unreasonably, or there is not substantial evidence to support the decision.

Interest of B.L.S. (Confidential) 2006 ND 188
Docket No.: 20060216
Filing Date: 8/28/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Mental Health
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: A district court cannot allow a respondent in a mental health proceeding to waive the right to counsel without first establishing, on the record, that the respondent is competent to waive counsel and that the waiver is knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily made.
To establish a valid waiver of counsel in a mental health proceeding, the district court must engage in a colloquy on the record that mirrors the required colloquy for the waiver of counsel in a criminal proceeding.

ACUITY v. Burd & Smith Construction, Inc., et al. 2006 ND 187
Docket No.: 20060001
Filing Date: 8/24/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Insurance
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: A commercial general liability insurance policy excludes coverage for damage to the insured's work product and provides coverage for accidental damage to property other than the insured's work product.

Jochim v. Jochim 2006 ND 186
Docket No.: 20060038
Filing Date: 8/24/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Maring, Mary

Ungar v. ND State University 2006 ND 185
Docket No.: 20050340
Filing Date: 8/24/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Employer/Employee Dispute
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: Res judicata, or claim preclusion, prevents the relitigation of claims that were raised, or could have been raised, in prior actions between the same parties or their privies resulting final judgment from a court of competent jurisdiction. Collateral estoppel, or issue preclusion, forecloses relitigation of issues of either fact or law in a second action based on a different claim, which were necessarily litigated, or must have been litigated, and decided in the prior action.
For the district court to have subject-matter jurisdiction over a university professor's claims against the university, the plaintiff must comply with the statutory notice of claim requirements and exhaust the internal administrative remedies.

State v. Dailey 2006 ND 184
Docket No.: 20060030
Filing Date: 8/24/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Felony
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: After a jury's verdict has been announced, a trial judge may explain to a jury what will occur after the trial has ended.

Peoples State Bk. of Truman v. Molstad Excavating, et al. 2006 ND 183
Docket No.: 20050444
Filing Date: 8/24/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Contracts
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: Part of the law of the case doctrine provides that the orderly functioning of the judicial process requires that judges of coordinate jurisdiction honor one another's orders and revisit them only in special circumstances.
The law of the case is not violated and reconsideration of prior orders is proper if the initial ruling was made on an inadequate record or was designed to be preliminary or tentative.
Construction of a written contract to determine its legal effect is a question of law, and on appeal this Court will independently examine and construe the contract to determine if the trial court erred in its interpretation.
To enforce a contract between two others, a third party must have been intended by the contracting parties to be benefited by the contract.

Clark v. Clark 2006 ND 182
Docket No.: 20050436
Filing Date: 8/21/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: A district court's decisions to admit expert testimony or deny a continuance will not be reversed absent an abuse of discretion.
A district court's decision whether to allow children to testify about their custody preference is reviewed under the abuse of discretion standard.
Rotating custody arrangements are in a child's best interests only if the parents are able to cooperate and set aside their differences and conflicts in their role as parents.
A district court's custody decision under the best-interest-of-the-child analysis is subject to the clearly erroneous standard of review.
Because a proper finding of net income is essential to determine the correct amount of child support under the child support guidelines, as a matter of law, a district court must clearly set forth how it arrived at the amount of income and the level of support.
A district court cannot include depreciation deductions in income when determining an obligor's child support obligation.

Hagel v. Hagel 2006 ND 181
Docket No.: 20050434
Filing Date: 8/21/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: When a district court provides no indication of the evidentiary and theoretical basis for its decision, the Supreme Court is left to speculate whether factors were properly considered and the law was properly applied, leaving the Court unable to perform its appellate function.

Mountrail Bethel Home v. Lovdahl, et al. 2006 ND 180
Docket No.: 20060002
Filing Date: 8/16/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Contracts
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: A district court must make findings on issues a party raises and presents evidence on.

State v. Woinarowicz 2006 ND 179
Docket No.: 20060032
Filing Date: 8/16/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Drugs/Contraband
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: The Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause does not apply to the same extent at pretrial suppression hearings as it does at trial.
A district court is not bound by the Rules of Evidence at pretrial evidentiary hearings.
Constructive possession of a controlled substance may be established by showing the individual had the power and ability to exercise dominion and control over the controlled substance.
An arrestee's person and purse may be searched incident to arrest.

Heng v. Rotech Medical Corp., et al. 2006 ND 176
Docket No.: 20050311
Filing Date: 8/2/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Employer/Employee Dispute
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: Issues cannot be raised for the first time on appeal.
Whether an employee has established a prima facie case of retaliatory discharge is a question of law fully reviewable on appeal.
An employer's failure to follow its own policies may support an inference of pretext, but not when the departure in policy is applied to all employees.
The admission of deposition testimony under N.D.R.Civ.P. 32(a) lies within the district court's discretion.
A comparison of hours and rates charged by opposing counsel is probative of the reasonableness of a request for attorney fees by prevailing counsel.
Mediation fees may not be awarded as an allowable cost if the parties have contractually agreed to share those expenses.
Electronic legal research fees are a component of attorney fees and cannot be separately taxed as costs.

State ex rel. ND Housing Finance Agency v. Center Mutual Ins. Co. 2006 ND 175
Docket No.: 20050224
Filing Date: 8/2/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Insurance
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: An instrument payable to multiple payees non-alternatively may only be negotiated, discharged, or enforced by all of them.
Payment of a check by a payor bank to one joint payee over the forged endorsement of another payee does not discharge the drawer's obligation on the instrument, and the payee has an action against the drawer on the instrument.
A check containing a forged endorsement is not "properly payable" under N.D.C.C. 41-04-32(1), and the drawer has a right to reimbursement of the amount of the check to its account if its bank accepts and pays the check.

Hunt v. Banner Health System 2006 ND 174
Docket No.: 20050402
Filing Date: 7/30/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Employer/Employee Dispute
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: The presence of a clear, conspicuous, and unambiguous disclaimer may act as an "escape hatch" in an employee handbook, virtually undoing other implied promises made in the handbook.
The language in an employee manual simply stating it does not guarantee employment does not preclude the manual from being an employment contact.

State v. Bjerklie 2006 ND 173
Docket No.: 20050438
Filing Date: 7/27/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Theft
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: A court's ruling on a motion in limine is reviewed for abuse of discretion.
A court abuses its discretion in granting a motion in limine when it acts in an arbitrary, unreasonable or unconscionable manner.

Deacon's Development v. Lamb, et al. 2006 ND 172
Docket No.: 20050147
Filing Date: 7/27/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Real Property
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: Attorney fees may be recovered if a court finds a party made a frivolous "claim for relief."
A court does not have authority to award attorney fees based on a position a party took prior to litigation.

Dvorak v. Dvorak (cross-ref. w/20040222) 2006 ND 171
Docket No.: 20050405
Filing Date: 7/27/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: A custodial parent seeking to change the residence of a child to another state has the burden to prove by a preponderance of evidence that the move is in the child's best interest.
A district court's explanation for a disparity in a property distribution must be sufficient to understand the rationale of its determination.
In deciding whether to award attorney's fees for an appeal in a divorce proceeding, a district court must balance the parties' needs and ability to pay.

Weinreis, et al. v. Hill, et al. 2006 ND 170
Docket No.: 20060026
Filing Date: 7/27/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Contracts
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: A principal is bound by acts of his agent under a merely ostensible authority to those persons only who in good faith and without ordinary negligence have incurred a liability or parted with value upon the faith thereof.
A district court's determination of negligence is a finding of fact which will not be set aside on appeal unless it is clearly erroneous.

State v. Salveson (Consolidated w/20060016) 2006 ND 169
Docket No.: 20060015
Filing Date: 7/27/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - DUI/DUS/APC
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: A trial court is allowed the widest range of discretion in criminal sentencing.
Multiple class A misdemeanor offenses may be deemed by the sentencing court to involve substantially different criminal objectives if they do not fall under one of the following three categories: (1) one offense is an included offense of the other; (2) one offense consists of a conspiracy, attempt, solicitation, or other form of preparation to commit, or facilitation of, the other; or (3) the offenses differ only in that one is defined to prohibit a designated kind of conduct generally and the other to prohibit a specific instance of such conduct.
The crimes of aggravated reckless driving and driving while under the influence constitute two crimes with substantially different criminal objectives.

State v. Campbell (Consolidated w/20050337 & 20050338) 2006 ND 168
Docket No.: 20050326
Filing Date: 7/27/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Drugs/Contraband
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: Under Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004), the admission of out-of-court testimonial statements in criminal cases is precluded, unless the witness is unavailable to testify and the accused has had an opportunity to cross-examine the declarant.
A defendant can waive a potential Confrontation Clause violation by failing to exercise a statutorily defined opportunity to subpoena the author of the state crime laboratory report.

The Ramsey Financial Corp. v. Haugland, et al. 2006 ND 167
Docket No.: 20050375
Filing Date: 7/26/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Corporations
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: Voluntary acquiescence in a judgment waives the right to appeal.
Absent fraud, the procedure for asserting dissenting shareholders' rights under N.D.C.C. 10-19.1-87 and 10-19.1-88 is an exclusive remedy.

Dahl, et al. v. Messmer, et al. 2006 ND 166
Docket No.: 20050426
Filing Date: 7/24/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Real Property
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: On appeal, the substantive evidentiary standard of proof is considered when reviewing a motion for summary judgment.
Fraud is never presumed, but must be proved by evidence that is clear and convincing.
A party seeking to reform a contract must prove, by clear and convincing evidence, that the written agreement does not fully or truly state the agreement the parties intended to make.
General expressions of opinion by a seller, commending of the thing he is selling, are not actionable even though not entirely true.
Generally, statements of value and predictions of future earnings or profits fall within the class of statements whose truth or falsity cannot be precisely determined and which are not, therefore, actionable as misrepresentations of fact.

Frisk v. Frisk 2006 ND 165
Docket No.: 20050391
Filing Date: 7/21/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Other
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: A domestic violence protection order may be extended upon request made prior to the order's expiration.
After a case has been remanded, the district court must cure any defects, but may do so in any manner consistent with the appellate court's opinion and conformable to law and justice.