Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
5251 - 5300 of 12382 results
Krall v. State (Consol. w/20050212 & 20050213) (cross-ref. 20000004)
2006 ND 51 Highlight: Denial of applications for post-conviction relief and motions for default judgment are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
Arth v. Arth
2006 ND 50 Highlight: Order for dismissal of lawsuit with prejudice is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6). |
State v. Hoverson
2006 ND 49
Highlight: The level of outrageous conduct necessary to prove a due process violation and bar prosecution is quite high and must shock the conscience of the court. |
Fischer, et al. v. Berger, et al.
2006 ND 48
Highlight: A use of land creates an easement by prescription if the use is adverse, continuous and uninterrupted, and for the 20-year period of prescription. |
Interest of F.F., et al. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2006 ND 47 Highlight: A court may terminate parental rights on finding the child (1) is deprived and (2) has been in foster care for at least four hundred fifty of the previous six hundred sixty nights. |
Berge v. Berge
2006 ND 46
Highlight: When a trial court does not clearly state how it calculated the amount of child support, the Supreme Court will reverse and remand for an explanation even if the record contains adequate evidence for the trial court to make a precise finding. |
State v. Bergstrom
2006 ND 45
Highlight: In a civil forfeiture action, the State must show probable cause exists to bring the forfeiture action, and then the claimant must prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, the property is not subject to forfeiture. |
State v. Anderson (CONSOLIDATED W/ 20050229)
2006 ND 44
Highlight: Information from an informant may provide the factual basis to establish reasonable suspicion for an investigatory stop. |
Causer v. State (cross-ref. w/20030124)
2006 ND 43 Highlight: Denial of application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1) and (7). |
Ward County Farm Bureau, et al. v. Poolman
2006 ND 42 Highlight: A petitioner for a writ of mandamus must first demonstrate a clear legal right to performance of the particular act sought to be compelled by the writ. |
State v. Ernst
2006 ND 41
Highlight: The writ of audita querela has been abolished in North Dakota. |
Ficklin v. Ficklin (CONFIDENTIAL)
2006 ND 40
Highlight: Before a court may enter a protection order, there must be a showing of actual or imminent domestic violence. |
State v. Stewart (Consolidated w/20050080 thru 20050086)
2006 ND 39
Highlight: The Court looks at the "totality of the circumstances" on appeal, giving deference to the district court's findings, to determine whether a search warrant was supported by probable cause. |
State v. Garten
2006 ND 38 Highlight: Denials of a motion to suppress, motion to sever the counts against the defendant, and a motion for new trial are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
State v. Klein
2006 ND 37 Highlight: Conviction for driving while under the influence of alcohol summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1) and (3). |
Maynard v. McNett
2006 ND 36
Highlight: When divorced parents share custody, the designation of a single custodian is not required, each parent can be declared a custodian, and both parents have all the legal rights designated to a custodial parent. |
Preference Personnel, Inc. v. Peterson
2006 ND 35
Highlight: The Department of Labor may not issue retroactive licenses for employment agencies. |
Stein v. Workforce Safety and Ins., et al.
2006 ND 34
Highlight: A court cannot ignore the clear language of a statute under the guise of liberal construction. |
MBNA v. Hart
2006 ND 33 Highlight: A court must confirm an arbitration award upon application of any party to the award unless a party has filed a motion with the court to vacate, modify, or correct the award within 90 days after delivery of a copy of the award, or within 90 days after grounds are known or should have been known to the injured party if the motion to vacate is based on corruption, fraud, or other undue means. |
Davis v. Killu, et al.
2006 ND 32
Highlight: An expert's testimony may not be used merely as a conduit to place otherwise inadmissible evidence before a jury. |
Bertsch v. Bertsch
2006 ND 31
Highlight: In deciding whether to award attorney fees under N.D.C.C. § 14-05-23, the trial court must balance one party's needs against the other party's ability to pay. |
Interest of D.D., et al. (CONFIDENTIAL)(Consolidated w/ 20050177)
2006 ND 30
Highlight: Findings of fact in juvenile proceedings will not be set aside on appeal unless clearly erroneous. |
Simon v. Simon (Consolidated w/20050356)
2006 ND 29 Highlight: The offset provisions of the split custody and equal custody regulations of the child support guidelines continue to apply to the parents' child support obligations when one parent assigns the right to receive child support to the State as reimbursement for TANF benefits received. |
Schwan v. Folden
2006 ND 28
Highlight: If a plaintiff does not move for default judgment after the default has occurred or within a reasonable time after the default, and the answer is subsequently filed, the plaintiff waives its right to default judgment for a defendant's failure to appear. |
Lentz v. Spryncznatyk
2006 ND 27
Highlight: A statute is employed retroactively when it is applied to a cause of action that arose prior to the effective date of the statute. |
Dunn v. State
2006 ND 26
Highlight: A motion for summary dismissal under the Uniform Post-Conviction Relief Act is akin to a motion for summary judgment. |
State v. Nikle
2006 ND 25
Highlight: Great weight is given to a potential juror's claim that he or she will maintain impartiality. |
Wheeler v. Gardner
2006 ND 24
Highlight: An inmate's responsibility for costs of a medical visit is not limited to a maximum of $10, but rather an inmate is responsible for the actual health care costs plus an additional $10 fee for each medical visit requested by the inmate. |
Hilgers v. Hilgers (Cross-ref w/20010208 & 20030252)
2006 ND 23 |
Interest of B.V. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2006 ND 22
Highlight: An order committing a sexually dangerous individual will be affirmed unless it is induced by an erroneous view of the law or it is not supported by clear and convincing evidence. |
State v. Feist
2006 ND 21
Highlight: When the nature of a plea agreement is ambiguous, a trial court should clarify the existence of a plea agreement on the record. |
Perez v. Nichols
2006 ND 20
Highlight: To succeed in a negligence claim, the plaintiff must prove the defendant owed a duty to the plaintiff, the defendant failed to discharge that duty, and the plaintiff has suffered an injury that was proximately caused by the defendant's negligence. |
Interest of M.B., et al. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2006 ND 19
Highlight: To terminate parental rights, the petitioner must provide specific facts that will be relied on to terminate the parent's rights so the parent has notice and is able to meaningfully prepare a defense. |
State v. Schrum
2006 ND 18 Highlight: A criminal defendant's sentence must be credited for time served in custody on that charge. |
Korynta v. Korynta
2006 ND 17 Highlight: When calculating child support, a trial court must not base its child support award on an extrapolation of an obligor's future income, unless evidence of the obligor's recent past circumstances are not a reliable indicator of his future circumstances. |
Hewson v. Hewson
2006 ND 16
Highlight: A trial court does not have continuing jurisdiction to modify a property distribution in a divorce judgment, but has continuing jurisdiction to modify child support. |
Edward H. Schwartz Const. Inc. v. Driessen
2006 ND 15
Highlight: The existence of an oral contract and the extent of its terms are questions of fact that are reviewed under the clearly erroneous standard of review. |
State v. Smith
2006 ND 14 Highlight: When an incorrect notice of appeal is filed leading to an issue not being appealed and the case proceeds through appeal, oral argument, and a written opinion, the issue will not be considered on a second appeal when the party made no attempt have the issue reviewed by correcting the notice of appeal or filing a petition for rehearing after the first appeal. |
Disciplinary Board v. Giese
2006 ND 13
Highlight: During a suspension, suspended attorneys may not hold themselves out as being authorized to practice law in this state. |
Kuperus v. Willson, et al.
2006 ND 12
Highlight: A written settlement agreement is interpreted under rules for construing written contracts. |
Livinggood v. Balsdon
2006 ND 11
Highlight: Damages for breach of a farm lease beyond one year are not speculative and uncertain as a matter of law but may be speculative and uncertain as a matter of fact. |
State v. Bertram (Consolidated w/20050036 and 20050037)
2006 ND 10
Highlight: Generally, legal advice is not a defense to a criminal prosecution, but may be used to negate the requisite state of mind in some circumstances. |
Bates v. State
2006 ND 9 Highlight: Denial of application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Moore v. State
2006 ND 8 Highlight: Denial of application for post-conviction relief and order quashing a subpoena is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1), (2), and (4). |
Interest of E.S., et al. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2006 ND 7 Highlight: Termination of parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
State v. Freeman (CONSOLIDATED W/20050318)
2006 ND 6
Highlight: A district court's rejection of an application of post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6). |
State v. Burgard
2006 ND 5 Highlight: Conviction of unlawful possession of drug related paraphernalia is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (4). |
Judicial Vacancy in Judgeship No. 1, South Central Judicial District
2006 ND 4 Highlight: Judgeship retained at Bismarck. |
Disciplinary Board v. Buresh
2006 ND 3 Highlight: Interim suspension of lawyer ordered. |
Disciplinary Board v. McKechnie (consol. w/ 20050363)
2006 ND 2 Highlight: Lawyer suspended. |