Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
1001 - 1100 of 12418 results
State v. Pulkrabek
2022 ND 128 |
Interest of A.G. (CONFIDENTIAL) (consolidated w/20210346)
2022 ND 127 Highlight: A juvenile court order finding two children to be in need of protection is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Interest of A.G. (CONFIDENTIAL) (consolidated w/20210346)
2022 ND 127 |
State v. Thomas
2022 ND 126
Highlight: A district court has broad discretion in admitting or excluding evidence at trial. |
State v. Thomas
2022 ND 126 |
State v. Bradshaw
2022 ND 125
Highlight: An issue not properly preserved for appeal is limited to whether the alleged error constitutes obvious error affecting substantial rights. |
State v. Bradshaw
2022 ND 125 |
Quamme v. Quamme
2022 ND 124
Highlight: An appellate court’s jurisdiction generally attaches upon the filing of a notice of appeal and is not relinquished until the court issues its mandate. |
Quamme v. Quamme
2022 ND 124 |
Interest of A.C. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2022 ND 123
Highlight: While this Court defers to a tribe on its membership determinations, without consistent and clear factual findings supporting the application of ICWA and North Dakota heightened review for Indian families, this Court is unable to determine the father’s issues on appeal. |
Interest of A.C. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2022 ND 123 |
Lehnerz, et al. v. Christopher
2022 ND 122
Highlight: A disorderly conduct restraining order is reviewed for an abuse of discretion. |
Lehnerz, et al. v. Christopher
2022 ND 122 |
State v. Frohlich
2022 ND 121 |
State v. Frohlich
2022 ND 121 Highlight: A criminal judgment entered after a jury found a defendant guilty of gross sexual imposition is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
State v. Tergesen
2022 ND 120 Highlight: A district court’s restitution order is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
State v. Tergesen
2022 ND 120 |
Blue Appaloosa v. NDIC
2022 ND 119
Highlight: The Industrial Commission’s jurisdiction does not depend solely on the filing of an application, but instead on the jurisdictional fact of intent. The Commission has the authority and duty to investigate potential violations of its regulations, including a failure to obtain a permit or file a bond. |
Blue Appaloosa v. NDIC
2022 ND 119 |
Larson v. WSI
2022 ND 118
Highlight: An appellant must satisfy statutory requirements for perfecting an appeal to the district court from an administrative agency decision for the court to have subject matter jurisdiction. |
Larson v. WSI
2022 ND 118 |
Gonzalez v. State
2022 ND 117
Highlight: Post-judgment motions following a judgment denying post-conviction relief will be treated as another application for post-conviction relief. |
Gonzalez v. State
2022 ND 117 |
Wickham v. State
2022 ND 116
Highlight: A comment on a defendant’s post-arrest silence is an improper comment on the right to remain silent in violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution. |
Wickham v. State
2022 ND 116 |
Schaff v. State
2022 ND 115 Highlight: An order denying post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Schaff v. State
2022 ND 115 |
Atkins v. State
2022 ND 114 Highlight: An order denying an application for postconviction relief and a pre-filing order under N.D. Sup. Ct. Admin. R. 58 concluding the applicant is a vexatious litigant are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (7). |
Atkins v. State
2022 ND 114 |
Schmitz v. State Board of Chiropractic Examiners
2022 ND 113
Highlight: A formal, evidentiary hearing is required whenever an administrative agency acts in a quasi-judicial capacity unless the parties either agree otherwise or there is no dispute of a material fact. |
Schmitz v. State Board of Chiropractic Examiners
2022 ND 113 |
State v. Kelly (consolidated w/ 20210350)
2022 ND 112 Highlight: Criminal judgments entered after the defendant pleaded guilty to driving under the influence, fourth or greater offense, are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7) and (8). |
State v. Kelly (consolidated w/ 20210350)
2022 ND 112 |
West Dakota Oil v. Kathrein Trucking, et al.
2022 ND 111
Highlight: The owner of a limited liability company generally is not liable for the company’s debts, obligations, or other liabilities. |
West Dakota Oil v. Kathrein Trucking, et al.
2022 ND 111 |
Anderson v. Spitzer, et al.
2022 ND 110
Highlight: A district court may modify residential responsibility if it finds a material change in circumstances and modification is necessary to serve the best interests of the child. |
Anderson v. Spitzer, et al.
2022 ND 110 |
In the Matter of the Adoption of K.M.T. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2022 ND 109
Highlight: Parental rights may be terminated upon a finding of abandonment. |
In the Matter of the Adoption of K.M.T. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2022 ND 109 |
Matter of Didier
2022 ND 108 Highlight: A district court’s order denying an application for discharge from civil commitment as a sexually dangerous individual is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Matter of Didier
2022 ND 108 |
State v. Landrus
2022 ND 107
Highlight: This Court may consider an obvious error that affects substantial rights. |
State v. Landrus
2022 ND 107 |
State v. Yellow Hammer
2022 ND 106 Highlight: Future medical expenses may be awarded as restitution to a crime victim if the amount can be ascertained from the evidence presented at a restitution hearing. |
State v. Yellow Hammer
2022 ND 106 |
Rath v. Rath, et al.
2022 ND 105
Highlight: A district court has broad discretion on evidentiary matters and over the conduct of a hearing. A ruling on a motion in limine is reviewed under the abuse of discretion standard. |
Rath v. Rath, et al.
2022 ND 105 |
Toman Engineering Co. v. Koch Construction, et al.
2022 ND 104
Highlight: The district court may exercise its inherent power to sanction when a party violates the duty to preserve evidence and destroys evidence relevant to the lawsuit. |
Toman Engineering Co. v. Koch Construction, et al.
2022 ND 104 |
Matter of Shane Lance Yates
2022 ND 103 Highlight: District court orders denying petitions for name changes and requests for evidentiary hearings are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
Matter of Shane Lance Yates
2022 ND 103 |
Matter of Amy Jo Yates
2022 ND 103 Highlight: District court orders denying petitions for name changes and requests for evidentiary hearings are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
Matter of Amy Jo Yates
2022 ND 103 |
State v. Rodriguez
2022 ND 102
Highlight: A district court’s dismissal of a criminal information is reviewed for an abuse of discretion. |
State v. Rodriguez
2022 ND 102 |
State v. Benter
2022 ND 101
Highlight: To represent oneself, a criminal defendant must voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently waive the right to counsel. |
State v. Benter
2022 ND 101 |
State v. Koval
2022 ND 100 Highlight: When a party challenges an underlying order prohibiting contact in a proceeding for violating that order, the challenge constitutes an impermissible collateral attack on the underlying order. |
State v. Koval
2022 ND 100 |
Updike v. Updike, et al.
2022 ND 99 Highlight: An underemployed child support obligor did not provide evidence to establish the N.D. Admin. Code § 75-02-04.1-07(5) exception for imputation of income based on the unavailability of employment applied. |
Updike v. Updike, et al.
2022 ND 99 |
WSI v. Boechler, PC, et al.
2022 ND 98
Highlight: A dismissal without prejudice is ordinarily not appealable because either side may commence another action. |
WSI v. Boechler, PC, et al.
2022 ND 98 |
Wheeler v. State (consolidated w/20220025 & 20220026)
2022 ND 97 Highlight: A district court’s N.D. Sup. Ct. Admin. R. 58 vexatious litigant pre-filing order is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (7). |
Wheeler v. State (consolidated w/20220025 & 20220026)
2022 ND 97 |
State v. Houle
2022 ND 96
Highlight: A party may not challenge as error a ruling or other trial proceeding invited by that party. |
State v. Houle
2022 ND 96 |
State v. Oshiro (consolidated w/20210255 & 20210256)
2022 ND 95 Highlight: A defendant’s release from prison renders his sentencing appeal moot if he is not subject to supervised release or probation after completing his prison term. |
State v. Oshiro (consolidated w/20210255 & 20210256)
2022 ND 95 |
City of West Fargo v. McAllister
2022 ND 94
Highlight: The primary purpose of statutory interpretation is to determine legislative intent. |
City of West Fargo v. McAllister
2022 ND 94 |
State v. Ruiz Ledezma
2022 ND 93 Highlight: A criminal judgment entered after a defendant pled guilty to criminal vehicular homicide is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (7). |
State v. Ruiz Ledezma
2022 ND 93 |
Matter of Rose Henderson Peterson Mineral Trust
2022 ND 92
Highlight: Satisfaction of an independent undisputed portion of a judgment does not operate as a full waiver of the right to appeal. |
Matter of Rose Henderson Peterson Mineral Trust
2022 ND 92 |
Eikom v. Eikom
2022 ND 91
Highlight: A district court’s decision to award parenting time to a noncustodial parent is based on the child’s best interests and not the wishes of the parents. |
Eikom v. Eikom
2022 ND 91 |
Dixon v. Dixon
2022 ND 90 Highlight: District court order discharging trustee, closing the trust, and concluding supervised administration is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Dixon v. Dixon
2022 ND 90 |
Matter of Emelia Hirsch Trust
2022 ND 89
Highlight: A district court pre-filing order against vexatious litigant under N.D. Sup. Ct. Admin. R. 58 is reviewed for an abuse of discretion. |
Matter of Emelia Hirsch Trust
2022 ND 89 |
Eckroth v. Eckroth, et al.
2022 ND 88 Highlight: An order denying a motion to modify primary residential responsibility and an order denying a motion for reconsideration are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (7). |
Eckroth v. Eckroth, et al.
2022 ND 88 |
Trenton Indian Housing Authority v. Poitra, et al.
2022 ND 87
Highlight: This Court adopts the two-part review articulated by the United States Supreme Court in Alaska v. Native Village of Venetie Tribal Government, 522 U.S. 520 (1998) to determine whether land is a dependent Indian community and therefore Indian country. |
Trenton Indian Housing Authority v. Poitra, et al.
2022 ND 87 |
Sauvageau, et al. v. Bailey, et al.
2022 ND 86
Highlight: This Court exercises its supervisory authority rarely and cautiously, and only to rectify errors and prevent injustice in extraordinary cases when no adequate alternative remedy exists. |
Sauvageau, et al. v. Bailey, et al.
2022 ND 86 |
Energy Transfer, et al. v. ND Private Investigative and Security Bd., et al.
2022 ND 85
Highlight: A person has standing to appeal from an order denying intervention. |
Energy Transfer, et al. v. ND Private Investigative and Security Bd., et al.
2022 ND 85 |
Energy Transfer, et al. v. ND Private Investigative and Security Bd., et al.
2022 ND 84
Highlight: An interlocutory order is only appealable when there is a statutory basis for the appeal and the district court has complied with the requirements of N.D.R.Civ.P. 54(b). |
Energy Transfer, et al. v. ND Private Investigative and Security Bd., et al.
2022 ND 84 |
Hudye Group v. Ward Cty. Bd. of Commissioners
2022 ND 83
Highlight: A local governing body’s decision on tax rebate and abatement applications is reviewed under the arbitrary, capricious, or unreasonable standard. |
Hudye Group v. Ward Cty. Bd. of Commissioners
2022 ND 83 |
Bridges v. State (consolidated w/20210352)
2022 ND 82 Highlight: Orders summarily dismissing applications for postconviction relief are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6) and (7). |
Bridges v. State (consolidated w/20210352)
2022 ND 82 |
Etemad v. State
2022 ND 81 Highlight: A district court order denying an amended application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Etemad v. State
2022 ND 81 |
Moncada v. State
2022 ND 80 Highlight: A district court order summarily dismissing an application for postconviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
Moncada v. State
2022 ND 80 |
Solberg v. Hennessy
2022 ND 79 Highlight: Amended judgment entered after a bench trial summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1) and (2). |