Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
1001 - 1100 of 12280 results
|
Matter of Rose Henderson Peterson Mineral Trust
2022 ND 92 |
|
Eikom v. Eikom
2022 ND 91 |
|
Dixon v. Dixon
2022 ND 90 |
|
Matter of Emelia Hirsch Trust
2022 ND 89 |
|
Eckroth v. Eckroth, et al.
2022 ND 88 |
|
Trenton Indian Housing Authority v. Poitra, et al.
2022 ND 87 |
|
Sauvageau, et al. v. Bailey, et al.
2022 ND 86 |
|
Energy Transfer, et al. v. ND Private Investigative and Security Bd., et al.
2022 ND 85 |
|
Energy Transfer, et al. v. ND Private Investigative and Security Bd., et al.
2022 ND 84 |
|
Hudye Group v. Ward Cty. Bd. of Commissioners
2022 ND 83 |
|
Bridges v. State (consolidated w/20210352)
2022 ND 82 |
|
Etemad v. State
2022 ND 81 |
|
Moncada v. State
2022 ND 80 |
|
Solberg v. Hennessy
2022 ND 79 |
|
State v. Hultberg
2022 ND 78 |
|
Hoff v. State
2022 ND 77 |
|
Ali v. State
2022 ND 76 |
|
Schultz v. DeClusin
2022 ND 75 |
|
State v. Heywood
2022 ND 74 |
|
Schauer v. Peterson
2022 ND 73 |
|
City of Bismarck v. Goodwin
2022 ND 72 |
|
Gaede v. State
2022 ND 71 |
|
Holmes v. State
2022 ND 70 |
|
Interest of M.R. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2022 ND 68 |
|
Burris v. Burris
2022 ND 67 |
|
Beck v. NDDOT
2022 ND 66 |
|
St. Alexius Medical Center v. Nesvig, et al.
2022 ND 65 |
|
Schrodt v. Schrodt, et al.
2022 ND 64 |
|
Twin City Technical, et al. v. Williams Cty, et al.
2022 ND 63 |
|
Adoption of A.A.H. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2022 ND 62 |
|
Canerdy v. Canerdy, et al.
2022 ND 61 |
|
Fourth v. State
2022 ND 60 |
|
State v. Bazile
2022 ND 59 |
|
Interest of T.H. (CONFIDENTIAL) (consolidated w/20220028-20220030)
2022 ND 58 |
|
Kaspari v. Kaspari
2022 ND 57 |
|
State v. Almklov (consolidated w/20210163)
2022 ND 56 |
|
State v. Schuh
2022 ND 55 |
|
Gregory v. State
2022 ND 54 |
|
Hagen v. North Dakota Insurance Reserve Fund
2022 ND 53 |
|
Schmitz v. State Board of Chiropractic Examiners
2022 ND 52 |
|
Sproule, et al. v. Johnson, et al.
2022 ND 51 |
|
Rogers v. State
2022 ND 50 |
|
State v. Fleck
2022 ND 49 |
|
Interest of R.S. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2022 ND 48 |
|
State v. Lusby
2022 ND 47 |
|
State v. McGinnis (consolidated w/20210217)
2022 ND 46 |
|
Harty Insurance v. Holmes, et al.
2022 ND 45 |
|
State v. Gaddie
2022 ND 44 |
|
Malloy, et al. v. Behrens
2022 ND 43 |
|
Vacancy in Judgeship No. 6, ECJD
2022 ND 42 |
|
Baker v. Autos, Inc., et al.
2022 ND 41 |
|
City of Jamestown v. Kastet
2022 ND 40 |
|
Taylor v. Taylor
2022 ND 39 |
|
State v. Samaniego
2022 ND 38 |
|
Lovett v. Lovett, et al.
2022 ND 37 |
|
Whetsel v. State (consolidated w/20210181)
2022 ND 36 |
|
Pavlicek v. American Steel Systems, Inc., et al.
2022 ND 35 |
|
State v. Willard
2022 ND 34 |
|
Goldade-Jose v. Jose, et al.
2022 ND 33 |
|
Lessard v. Johnson
2022 ND 32 |
|
State v. Halsey
2022 ND 31
Highlight: A district court’s admission of prior bad acts evidence without the required three-step analyis was harmless error. |
|
State v. Davis
2022 ND 30 |
|
Orwig v. Orwig (consolidated w/20210141)
2022 ND 29 |
|
Krile v. Lawyer
2022 ND 28 |
|
Christiansen v. NDDOT
2022 ND 27 |
|
Sherman v. Guillaume, et al.
2022 ND 26 |
|
State v. Clairmont
2022 ND 25 |
|
Divide County v. Stateline Service, et al. (consolidated w/20210017)
2022 ND 24 Highlight: A road restriction is not published for purposes of N.D.C.C. § 39-12-03(2)(a) unless the information is available in the typical location where a user seeking such information would expect to find it. |
|
Bubel v. Bubel
2022 ND 23 |
|
Friesz v. State
2022 ND 22 |
|
State v. Martinez
2022 ND 21 |
|
Simmons v. Cudd Pressure Control, et al.
2022 ND 20 |
|
Anderson v. Pedie, et al.
2022 ND 19 |
|
State v. Bolinske, Sr.
2022 ND 18 |
|
Fischer v. Hoyt
2022 ND 17 |
|
Pomarleau v. Pomarleau, et al.
2022 ND 16
Highlight: A district court may consider whether an obligor made a voluntary change in employment, and if they find the obligor did, the district court has the discretion to base the obligor’s child support income based on the previous, higher income. |
|
Wald v. Hovey, et al.
2022 ND 15 |
|
Plaisimond v. State
2022 ND 14 |
|
Estate of Beach
2022 ND 13
Highlight: A holographic will is valid if the signature and material portions of the document are in the testator’s handwriting. |
|
Armstrong v. Helms
2022 ND 12 |
|
Matter of Shane Lance Yates
2022 ND 11 |
|
Matter of Amy Jo Yates
2022 ND 11 |
|
Brendel Construction v. WSI
2022 ND 10 |
|
State v. Mayland
2022 ND 9 |
|
Vic Christensen Mineral Trust v. Enerplus Resources Corp., et al.
2022 ND 8 Highlight: An oil and gas operator may suspend royalty payments to the mineral owner in the event of a dispute of title existing that would affect distribution of royalty payments. The operator shall make royalty payments to those mineral owners whose title and ownership interest is not in dispute. |
|
State v. Castleman
2022 ND 7 Highlight: The ordinary meaning of “mental injury” as used in N.D.C.C. § 14-09-22(1) requires mental suffering and trauma that has some lasting, non-transitory effect. |
|
Livingston v. WSI, et al.
2022 ND 6 |
|
Lebeau v. State
2022 ND 5 |
|
Muscha v. Krolik, et al.
2022 ND 4 |
|
State v. Dargbeh
2022 ND 3 |
|
Gerving v. Gerving, et al.
2022 ND 2
Highlight: The district court must comply with the child support guidelines in calculating a parent’s child support obligation. |
|
Tergesen, et al. v. Nelson Homes
2022 ND 1 |
|
Matter of Knoke
2021 ND 240
Highlight: The district court’s probable cause determination in a civil commitment case becomes moot once the commitment hearing is held. |
|
State v. Carrillo
2021 ND 239 |
|
Estate of Smith
2021 ND 238 |
|
Taszarek, et al. v. Lakeview Excavating, et al.
2021 ND 237
Highlight: When the Court remands for redetermination of an issue without specifying the procedure to be followed, the district court may decide the issue based on the evidence already before it or may take additional evidence. |
|
Cavare v. Kjelgren
2021 ND 236
Highlight: In an appeal from a bench trial, the district court’s findings of fact are reviewed under the clearly erroneous standard and its conclusions of law are fully reviewable. |
|
State v. Roberts
2021 ND 235 |
|
Heggem v. Heggem
2021 ND 234 |
|
Hehr v. Hehr
2021 ND 233 |