Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
5901 - 5950 of 12359 results
|
State v. Olson (consol. w/20020092)
2003 ND 23
Highlight: Probation revocation is not a stage of a criminal proceeding. |
|
Disciplinary Board v. McKechnie
2003 ND 22
Highlight: A lawyer is publicly reprimanded and ordered to pay the costs of the disciplinary proceedings for violating N.D.R. Prof. Conduct 1.4(b). |
|
First Western Bank & Trust v. First Lutheran Church Foundation, et al.
2003 ND 21
Highlight: The parties have the primary duty to bring to the court's attention the proper rules of law applicable to a case. |
|
Hanson v. Hanson
2003 ND 20
Highlight: N.D.R.Civ.P. 59(j) does not apply to a motion for change of custody. Rather, a motion to modify custody is properly brought under N.D.C.C. 14-09-06.6. |
|
State v. Holzer
2003 ND 19 Highlight: When challenging the validity of a search warrant based on an allegation of information being omitted from the application for the warrant, the defendant must show (1) that the police omitted facts with the intent to make, or in reckless disregard of whether they thereby made, the affidavit misleading, and (2) that the affidavit if supplemented by the omitted information would not have been sufficient to support a finding of probable cause. |
|
Wagner v. Squibb, et al.
2003 ND 18 Highlight: Without a sufficient transcript of the trial court proceedings, this Court cannot make a meaningful and intelligent review of a trial court's decision. |
|
Moen v. State
2003 ND 17
Highlight: To pursue a claim against the State or a state employee, a person must give notice of the claim within 180 days "after the alleged injury is discovered or reasonably should have been discovered." |
|
Shields v. Shields
2003 ND 16 Highlight: Spousal support is appropriate for a disadvantaged spouse who has foregone opportunities or lost advantages as a consequence of the marriage and who has contributed during the marriage to the supporting spouse's increased earning capacity. |
|
State v. Leppert
2003 ND 15
Highlight: The 2001 amendments to N.D.C.C. 31-13-03 authorize DNA testing of persons convicted of nonsexual felonies and establish a DNA data base for the test results of persons convicted of those offenses. |
|
Rittenour, et al. v. Gibson
2003 ND 14
Highlight: A tenant knowing of a dangerous condition on the premises has a duty to warn a social guest. |
|
Lee, et al. v. Owan
2003 ND 13 Highlight: A trial court judgment finding the terms of an oral contract were definite and the parties' performance was sufficient to remove the contract from the statute of frauds is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
|
Howe, et al. v. Microsoft Corporation, et al.
2003 ND 12
Highlight: Class certification is not automatically precluded because individual issues will remain after the common questions of law and fact have been resolved. |
|
Disciplinary Board v. Lee
2003 ND 11 Highlight: Lawyer suspended from the practice of law for one year. |
|
Dennison v. ND Dept. of Human Services
2003 ND 10 Highlight: The State's recorded homestead statement for old age assistance benefits under N.D.R.C. 50-0707 (1943) runs against the recipient of benefits and not against the land, and the State's claim against the recipient's estate may be extinguished if not pursued in a timely manner. |
|
Jundt v. Jurassic Resources, et al.
2003 ND 9
Highlight: A trial court abuses its discretion only when it acts in an unreasonable, arbitrary, or unconscionable manner, when its decision is not the product of a rational mental process leading to a reasoned decision, or when it misinterprets or misapplies the law. |
|
Wilson v. Farmers Insurance Group
2003 ND 8 Highlight: Except when the evidence is such that a reasoning mind could draw only one conclusion, whether an insured substantially complied with an insurance policy provision is a question of fact precluding summary judgment. |
|
State, et al. v. Gratech Co., et al.
2003 ND 7 Highlight: Absent a specific statutory or contractual exclusion, arbitrators have jurisdiction to determine whether a party has complied with procedural conditions precedent to arbitration. |
|
State v. Hammeren
2003 ND 6
Highlight: The defendant has the burden of proving, by a preponderance of evidence, the affirmative defense of entrapment. |
|
Engh v. Engh
2003 ND 5 Highlight: A party moving for a change in child custody within two years after entry of an order establishing custody may get an evidentiary hearing only if the trial court first determines the moving party has established a prima facie case justifying a modification by showing willful interference with visitation, danger to the child's health, or a change in primary physical care of the child to the other parent for longer than six months. |
|
Kondrad v. Bismarck Park District
2003 ND 4 Highlight: While the law does not favor contracts exonerating parties from liability for their conduct, parties are bound by clear and unambiguous language evidencing an intent to extinguish liability. |
|
Higgins v. Trauger (Consolidated w/20020133)
2003 ND 3
Highlight: Collusion does not require fraudulent conduct. |
|
Downing v. ND Workers Comp., et al.
2003 ND 2 Highlight: Judgment of the district court affirming a final order of the North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
|
Duemeland v. Norback
2003 ND 1 Highlight: A document is ambiguous when reasonable arguments can be made for different interpretations of the meaning of the document. |
|
Estate of Gleeson
2002 ND 211 Highlight: A person protected by a conservatorship retains the capacity to contract or engage in other transactions under our conservatorship statutes. |
|
State v. Bingaman
2002 ND 210 Highlight: In determining whether to order restitution, a court may take into account the defendant's ability to pay the restitution amount. |
|
Hilton v. ND Education Association, et al.
2002 ND 209
Highlight: Counselors who were certified under N.D.C.C. ch. 15-36 and who did not devote more than fifty percent of their time to administration duties were teachers under N.D.C.C. ch. 15-38.1. |
|
State v. Weisz
2002 ND 207
Highlight: When a party fails to adequately preserve an issue for appellate review, appellate inquiry is limited to noticing obvious error. |
|
Sweeney v. Sweeney
2002 ND 206
Highlight: A trial court's decision whether to change custody is a finding of fact subject to the clearly erroneous standard of review on appeal. |
|
Gawryluk v. Poynter, et al.
2002 ND 205 Highlight: The Duhig rationale applies to a grantor's overconveyance of mineral interests, and if the grantor does not own enough mineral interests to satisfy the conveyance, the conveyance is construed as a transfer of all the grantor's mineral interests. |
|
Grand Forks Professional Baseball, Inc., et al. v. Workers Comp.
2002 ND 204 Highlight: An officer or director of a corporation can be held personally liable for unpaid worker's compensation insurance premiums even though that officer or director does not own stock in the corporation. |
|
State v. Boyd
2002 ND 203
Highlight: A community caretaking encounter does not involve detecting, investigating, or acquiring evidence related to a potential legal violation. |
|
State v. Bingaman (cross-reference w/20020134)
2002 ND 202 Highlight: To prove obvious error, a party must show (1) error, (2) which is plain, and (3) that affects substantial rights. |
|
Wanner v. N.D. Workers Comp. Bureau
2002 ND 201
Highlight: While a failure to report income from work is material to the Bureau's ability to determine a claimant's entitlement to benefits and to calculate the amount of benefits, a failure to report money received apart from work is not similarly material |
|
State v. Hernandez
2002 ND 200 Highlight: Judgment entered on defendant's guilty plea to gross sexual imposition is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4). |
|
Interest of G.H.
2002 ND 199 Highlight: A district court order requiring treatment at the State Hospital is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
|
State v. Mohamed
2002 ND 198 Highlight: Conviction of child abuse and neglect is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
|
Disciplinary Board v. Sundby
2002 ND 197 Highlight: Interim suspension of lawyer ordered. |
|
Larson v. Larson
2002 ND 196 Highlight: A motion to reconsider an order disposing of a time-tolling, post-trial motion does not extend the time to file a notice of appeal. |
|
Greybull v. Harlan
2002 ND 195 Highlight: Denial of motion to reduce child support payment summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
|
Giese v. Giese
2002 ND 194
Highlight: A party cannot demand a change of judge under N.D.C.C. 29-15-21 when the assigned judge has ruled upon any matter pertaining to an action or proceeding in which the demanding party was heard or had an opportunity to be heard. |
|
State v. Jones
2002 ND 193
Highlight: A defendant charged with a felony has a right to a preliminary hearing and, if assisted by counsel, can waive this right. |
|
Ramsey Co. Social Serv. Bd., et al. v. Kamara
2002 ND 192
Highlight: When seeking modification of a child support order within one year of its entry, the party seeking modification must establish that a material change of circumstances has occurred. |
|
Interest of F.R.S.
2002 ND 191 |
|
State v. Skorick
2002 ND 190
Highlight: A trial court errs when it permits witnesses to remain in the courtroom for purposes of returning as rebuttal witnesses despite a request for sequestration. The error may be harmless when the testimony by the rebuttal witness did not affect the defendant's substantial rights. |
|
State v. Dunn
2002 ND 189
Highlight: Persons have a reasonable privacy expectation in their personal property, which is protected by the Fourth Amendment proscription against unreasonable search and seizure. |
|
Interest of D.Q., et al. (Confidential) (Consolidated w/20020079)
2002 ND 188 Highlight: A district court's review of a judicial referee's findings and recommendations under Administrative Rule 13, section 11(b), when it is a review of the record, is governed by N.D.R.Civ.P. 53, and the district court is obliged to accept the referee's findings unless they are clearly erroneous. |
|
Walker v. Walker
2002 ND 187
Highlight: Use of the Bullock formula to distribute retirement pay is not mandatory if the overall distribution of marital property is equitable. |
|
Myhre v. ND Workers Comp.
2002 ND 186
Highlight: A claimant seeking benefits from the workers compensation fund must establish by a preponderance of the evidence a causal relationship between her employment and the medical condition for which benefits are sought. |
|
Hamilton v. Oppen, et al.
2002 ND 185
Highlight: Averaging individual jurors' estimates of percentages of fault is not improper in a quotient verdict, but the jurors' prior agreement to be bound by the result of the computation invalidates the verdict. |
|
Jensen v. State
2002 ND 184 Highlight: Judgment denying an application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6). |