Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
6351 - 6400 of 12382 results
Hurt v. Hurt
2001 ND 13
Highlight: Evidence of domestic violence which does not trigger the statutory presumption under N.D.C.C. 14-09-06.2(1)(j) remains one of the best interest factors to be considered by the court. |
City of Harvey v. Fettig
2001 ND 12 Highlight: The prosecutor's statement supporting an appeal from a suppression order cannot be a mere paraphrase of the statutory language, but must explain the relevance of and need for the evidence which was suppressed. |
Nord, et al. v. Herrman, et al.
2001 ND 11
Highlight: Any survey method that results in equitable allocation of a new shoreline in proportion to each owner's share of the original shoreline will satisfy the legal requirement of proportional allocation. |
Interest of J.S. (CONFIDENTIAL-M.H.)
2001 ND 10
Highlight: Expedited appeals under the mental health law are limited to the procedures, findings, and conclusions of the lower court. Because of this limited review, detailed findings are necessary. |
Clark v. State
2001 ND 9 Highlight: Under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 2355 (2000), any fact, other than prior convictions, that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be found by a jury and proved beyond a reasonable doubt. |
Doyle v. Sprynczynatyk
2001 ND 8 Highlight: Points on a driving record must be reduced for completion of a defensive driver course only if the points are accumulated prior to completing the course. Points accumulate when entered on the driving record, not at the date of the traffic citation or conviction. |
Disciplinary Board v. Howe
2001 ND 7 Highlight: A lawyer's conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation generally results in suspension from the practice of law. |
Reiser v. Reiser
2001 ND 6
Highlight: In dividing the marital estate, fault causing deterioration of the marriage is a relevant factor under the Ruff-Fischer guidelines. |
State v. Kelly
2001 ND 5 Highlight: Judgment of conviction for gross sexual imposition, attempted gross sexual imposition, felonious restraint, and theft summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
Marschner v. Marschner
2001 ND 4
Highlight: A spouse is disadvantaged who has foregone opportunities or lost advantages as a consequence of the marriage and who has contributed during the marriage to the supporting spouse's increased earning capacity. A disadvantaged spouse is not required to deplete a property distribution in order to live. |
City of Fargo v. Salsman
2001 ND 3 Highlight: The trial court's judgment of conviction for a violation of Fargo Municipal Code is affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Englund v. State (Consolidated w/20000251 through 20000254)
2001 ND 2 Highlight: Appeal from denial of post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
Petition for Change of Designation of Judgeship No. 1
2001 ND 1 Highlight: Petition to move chambers of Judgeship No. 1 in the Southwest Judicial District from Dickinson to Bowman denied. |
Estate of Lutz (Cross-Ref. w/960177 & 980390)
2000 ND 226
Highlight: Whether services performed by a family member are so exceptional and extraordinary as to imply a contract to pay for those services is a question of fact. |
Jacobson v. ND Workers Comp. Bureau
2000 ND 225
Highlight: A willful false claim or false statement is sufficiently material for forfeiture of future benefits if it is a statement which could have misled the Bureau in a determination of the claim. |
Berger v. ND Workers Comp. et al.
2000 ND 224
Highlight: An owner of a business is not entitled to workers compensation benefits without securing optional coverage. |
State v. Helmenstein
2000 ND 223
Highlight: Voluntariness of a confession is determined by the totality of the circumstances, focusing on the characteristics and condition of the accused at the time of the confession, as well as the details of the setting in which the confession was obtained. |
Interest of C.R.H. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2000 ND 222 Highlight: In terminating parental rights under N.D.C.C. ch. 27-20 the trial court has no authority to make the termination contingent on the terminated parents receiving visitation rights upon the child's adoption. |
Disciplinary Board v. Keller
2000 ND 221 Highlight: Once objections are filed by an attorney to a hearing panel's findings and recommendations, the appropriate procedure to address a claim of lack of notice of order for default is to move the Supreme Court to remand the matter to the Hearing Panel for consideration of a motion to vacate. |
Superpumper, Inc. v. Nerland Oil (Cross-reference w/970307)
2000 ND 220 Highlight: The automatic bankruptcy stay applies to actions against a non-debtor codefendant where there is such an identity between the debtor and the codefendant that the debtor is the real party defendant and a judgment against the codefendant is, in effect, a judgment against the debtor. |
Pfeifle v. Tanabe
2000 ND 219
Highlight: A lessee may terminate a lease and vacate the premises when the lessor fails to secure quiet possession of the premises within a reasonable time, considering the cumulative effect of long-standing and continuous problems. |
Davenport v. State
2000 ND 218
Highlight: Although a trial court must inform a defendant of all direct consequences of a guilty plea, it need not advise a defendant of collateral consequences |
Redfield v. Bitterman, et al. (CONSOLIDATED W/20000162 & 20000181)
2000 ND 217
Highlight: Absent an abuse of discretion, the supreme court will not set aside a trial court's order on a motion for an extension of time to appeal, based upon excusable neglect. |
Mondry v. Mondry
2000 ND 216 Highlight: Judgment valuing and distributing marital property and awarding attorney fees is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), (4). |
State v. Lee
2000 ND 215 Highlight: Judgment of conviction for the felony offense of bail jumping is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
Lawrence v. Delkamp (CONSOLIDATED W/20000151)
2000 ND 214 Highlight: Under N.D.C.C. 14-09-06.2(1)(j), threats can constitute domestic violence for purposes of restricting visitation only if they constitute the infliction of fear of imminent physical harm. |
Matrix Properties, Corp. v. TAG Investments, et al. (cross-ref. w/990336)
2000 ND 213 Highlight: District court's post-judgment order summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1 (a)(1). |
State v. Glass
2000 ND 212
Highlight: DUI is a strict liability offense for which a jury instruction on culpability is not required. |
Syvertson v. Malaktaris, et al.
2000 ND 211 Highlight: Judgment dismissing a complaint under Rule 12(b), N.D.R.Civ.P., is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1. |
Nodak Mutual Farm Bur. v. Kosmatka, et al.
2000 ND 210
Highlight: N.D.R.Civ.P. 54(b) allows final judgment adjudicating fewer than all claims or the rights and liabilities of fewer than all parties in multiparty litigation. |
Schultze v. Continental Ins. Co.
2000 ND 209 Highlight: When several claims are made against an insured, an insurer has a duty to defend the entire lawsuit if there is potential liability or a possibility of coverage for one of the claims. |
Interest of W.E., et al. (CONFIDENTIAL)(Consolidated w/20000079 & 20000080)
2000 ND 208
Highlight: To terminate parental rights, a three-part test must be satisfied by clear and convincing evidence: (1) the child is deprived; (2) the conditions and causes of deprivation are likely to continue; and (3) the child is suffering or will suffer serious physical, mental, moral, or emotional harm. |
Jones v. Barnett
2000 ND 207
Highlight: An action to rescind a quitclaim deed is barred by the statute of limitations when the seller fails to submit evidence she did not discover until years later she had been fraudulently induced to convey the property, when her own pleadings indicate knowledge of material facts accruing beyond the six-year limit for fraud claims. |
Berlin v. State
2000 ND 206
Highlight: To establish ineffective assistance of counsel, the defendant must prove the counsel's performance was deficient and the deficient performance prejudiced the result. |
State v. Gleeson
2000 ND 205
Highlight: When there is sufficient doubt concerning a defendant's competency, a trial court must on its own motion conduct a hearing to determine whether the defendant is competent to stand trial. |
Mayo v. Mayo
2000 ND 204
Highlight: In deciding a motion to modify custody, a trial court must consider whether there has been a significant change of circumstances and whether modification is necessary to serve the best interests of the child. |
Logan v. Bush
2000 ND 203 |
State v. Erickstad (CONSOLIDATED W/20000051 and w/20000052 & 20000053))
2000 ND 202
Highlight: A defendant seeking a change of venue for adverse pretrial publicity must demonstrate a reasonable likelihood of prejudice so pervasive that it is impossible to impanel a fair and impartial jury. |
Mathre v. State
2000 ND 201
Highlight: Defense counsel should consult fully with the accused about any lesser included offenses the trial court may be willing to submit to the jury, but failure to do so is not always ineffective assistance of counsel. |
O'Neill v. O'Neill
2000 ND 200
Highlight: A movant seeking change of custody, who brings allegations, supported by affidavit, demonstrating a custodial environment which may be endangering the childrens' physical or mental health, presents a prima facie case entitling the movant to an evidentiary hearing. |
State v. Gehring
2000 ND 199 Highlight: Denial of a suppression motion and judgment entered on a conditional guilty plea are summarily affirmed. N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
State v. Lunstad
2000 ND 198 Highlight: Conviction of surreptitious intrusion summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (4). |
State v. Wilson
2000 ND 197 Highlight: Judgment of conviction for crime of accomplice to assault is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a) (3) and (7). |
ND Workers Comp. Bureau, et al. v. General Investment Corp., et al.
2000 ND 196
Highlight: Section 38-09-01, N.D.C.C., generally reserves fifty percent of all oil, natural gas, or minerals whenever the State transfers land owned by the State. |
Schumacher v. Schumacher (Cross-ref. w/990016)
2000 ND 195 Highlight: Spousal support and child support order is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Disciplinary Board v. Robb (Cross-reference w/ 20000096)
2000 ND 194 Highlight: Attorney ordered disbarred. |
Lake Region Lutheran Home, Inc. v. Halvorson, et al.
2000 ND 193 Highlight: An appeal from a trial court's judgment dismissing a motion to vacate judgment is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) (the trial court did not abuse its discretion). |
Center Mutual Insurance Co. v. Thompson
2000 ND 192
Highlight: Terms of an insurance policy are given their ordinary, usual, and commonly accepted meaning. |
Belisle v. Gibson, et al.
2000 ND 191 Highlight: The trial court's denial of a motion for a new trial and its judgment entered on a jury verdict finding defendants not liable in a personal injury action are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (4). |
Kautzman v. Kautzman (Cross ref. w/980004, 990328 & 990386)
2000 ND 190
Highlight: When a party executes on a money judgment to secure a division of property, the debtor is not entitled to an exemption for life insurance policies or annuities. |