Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
601 - 650 of 12382 results
|
State v. Schaf
2023 ND 81 |
|
State v. Hannesson
2023 ND 80
Highlight: Ordering a mistrial is an extreme remedy that is only appropriate when there is a fundamental defect or occurrence at trial that makes it evident that continuing would be productive of manifest injustice. |
|
State v. Hannesson
2023 ND 80 |
|
Hanson v. Hettervig, et al.
2023 ND 79 Highlight: An order of contempt and an amended order of contempt and award of attorney’s fees are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (7). |
|
Hanson v. Hettervig, et al.
2023 ND 79 |
|
Fietzek v. Fietzek
2023 ND 78
Highlight: A district court’s finding on a valuation of real property is not clearly erroneous if it is within the range of evidence presented. |
|
Fietzek v. Fietzek
2023 ND 78 |
|
State v. Frederick
2023 ND 77
Highlight: In the instance of an alleged public trial violation, an appellant must demonstrate the public was excluded from a proceeding taking place during trial, and that the proceeding was substantive in nature. |
|
State v. Frederick
2023 ND 77 |
|
Sandberg v. WSI, et al.
2023 ND 76 |
|
Sandberg v. WSI, et al.
2023 ND 76
Highlight: WSI can exercise continuing jurisdiction under N.D.C.C. § 65-05-04, but is limited by the law-of-the-case doctrine. |
|
Estate of Lindbo
2023 ND 75
Highlight: A personal representative is entitled to reasonable compensation for the personal representative’s services. |
|
Estate of Lindbo
2023 ND 75 |
|
Krueger v. Krueger
2023 ND 74 Highlight: A district court’s order on spousal support and contempt is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
|
Interest of K.B. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2023 ND 73 Highlight: An order requiring hospitalization is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
|
Interest of J.S. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2023 ND 72 Highlight: A juvenile court order terminating parental rights is affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) & (4). |
|
Jahner v. NDDHS
2023 ND 71 Highlight: This Court exercises limited review in appeals from administrative agency decisions. However, the application and interpretation of a statute is a question of law, which is fully reviewable in an administrative appeal. |
|
Jahner v. NDDHS
2023 ND 71 |
|
State v. Jacobs
2023 ND 70 Highlight: A criminal judgment is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (4). |
|
State v. Jacobs
2023 ND 70 |
|
Jones v. Rath
2023 ND 69 Highlight: A disorderly conduct restraining order must be supported by specific findings of intent to adversely affect the safety, security, or privacy of another person. |
|
Jones v. Rath
2023 ND 69 |
|
State v. Neugebauer
2023 ND 68
Highlight: A criminal sentence finalized before enactment of a statute cannot be reduced. |
|
State v. Neugebauer
2023 ND 68 |
|
Whetsel v. State
2023 ND 67 Highlight: An order summarily dismissing an application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6). |
|
Whetsel v. State
2023 ND 67 |
|
Martinez v. State
2023 ND 66 Highlight: A district court order denying an application for postconviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
|
Kluver, et al. v. SGJ Holdings, et al.
2023 ND 65
Highlight: A party moving for a new trial is limited on appeal to the issues raised in its new trial motion. |
|
Kluver, et al. v. SGJ Holdings, et al.
2023 ND 65 |
|
Wilkinson v. State
2023 ND 64 Highlight: An order denying an application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
|
Wilkinson v. State
2023 ND 64 |
|
Secura Supreme Ins. Co., et al. v. Differding, et al.
2023 ND 63 Highlight: An insurance policy is a contract. An insurance contract relates to the parties executing it. Litigants cannot claim estoppel based on policies to which they are not a party; nor can they claim waiver of a provision in a policy they have no right to enforce. |
|
Secura Supreme Ins. Co., et al. v. Differding, et al.
2023 ND 63 |
|
State v. Grant
2023 ND 62
Highlight: A Batson challenge includes a three-step inquiry: (1) A defendant must make a prima facie showing that a peremptory challenge has been exercised on the basis of race; (2) If that showing has been made, the prosecution must offer a race-neutral basis for striking the juror in question; and, (3) In light of the parties’ submissions, the trial court must determine whether the defendant has shown purposeful discrimination. |
|
State v. Grant
2023 ND 62 |
|
State v. Tompkins
2023 ND 61 Highlight: Section 39-08-01(1), N.D.C.C., provides that refusal to submit to a chemical test and driving or being in actual physical control while under the influence of an intoxicating liquor are separate offenses. |
|
State v. Tompkins
2023 ND 61 |
|
Interest of D.H. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2023 ND 60 Highlight: A district court’s order for continued treatment is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
|
Richardson v. State
2023 ND 59 Highlight: A district court order denying an application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
|
Bauer v. Bauer
2023 ND 58 Highlight: An amended judgment is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7). |
|
State v. Linner
2023 ND 57
Highlight: The structural error doctrine applies to a narrow class of rights, including three Sixth Amendment rights defining the framework of a trial: the right to counsel, the right to self-represent, and the right to a public trial. Voir dire falls within the scope of public trials under the Sixth Amendment. |
|
State v. Linner
2023 ND 57 |
|
State v. K.J.A. (Confidential)
2023 ND 56 Highlight: Section 25-03.3-04, N.D.C.C., precludes a court from destroying records early under N.D.R.Juv.P. 19(e) when the alleged offense is an offense defined in N.D.C.C. § 12.1-20 or N.D.C.C. § 12.1-27.2. |
|
State v. K.J.A. (Confidential)
2023 ND 56 |
|
Senske Rentals, et al. v. City of Grand Forks
2023 ND 55
Highlight: The appellate court has discretion whether to grant a parties’ request for judicial notice on appeal. |
|
Senske Rentals, et al. v. City of Grand Forks
2023 ND 55 |
|
Pozorski, et al. v. Trucks, Trailers & More, et al.
2023 ND 54 Highlight: A district court judgment dismissing a party’s claims is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
|
Pozorski, et al. v. Trucks, Trailers & More, et al.
2023 ND 54 |
|
Goetz v. Goetz, et al.
2023 ND 53 Highlight: A district court must make specific findings regarding whether a material change in circumstances resulted in a general decline or adversely affected the children in order to modify primary residential responsibility. |
|
Goetz v. Goetz, et al.
2023 ND 53 |