Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
651 - 700 of 12250 results
|
State v. Hanson
2023 ND 175 Highlight: A criminal judgment and sentencing for child abuse and child neglect are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35(a)(2) and (4). |
|
State v. Entzel
2023 ND 174 Highlight: A criminal judgment entered after a jury conviction of conspiracy to commit murder is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
|
Matter of John V. Klein Trust
2023 ND 173 Highlight: An order granting trustees’ petition for sale of trust’s surface interests and distribution of mineral interests to beneficiaries is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (7). |
|
Discover Bank v. Romanick, et al.
2023 ND 172
Highlight: We exercise our supervisory jurisdiction rarely and cautiously to rectify errors and prevent injustice in extraordinary cases in which no adequate alternative remedy exists. |
|
Berger, et al. v. Sellers, et al.
2023 ND 171 |
|
Vacancy in Judgeship No. 1, SEJD
2023 ND 170 Highlight: Judgship retained at Jamestown. |
|
Disciplinary Board v. Slyva
2023 ND 169 Highlight: Lawyer reprimanded. |
|
Suiter v. NDDOT
2023 ND 168 Highlight: The district court judgment affirming an administrative suspension of a defendant’s driver’s license is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(5) and (7). |
|
Ruiz Ledezma v. State
2023 ND 167 Highlight: The district court order denying a defendant’s petition for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4). |
|
Bechtle v. Bechtle, et al.
2023 ND 166 Highlight: A district court order denying a motion to modify parenting time is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P 35.1(a)(2). |
|
Buller v. Buller
2023 ND 165 Highlight: A district court’s order regarding primary residential responsibility and valuation and distribution of the martial estate is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
|
Friends of the Rail Bridge, et al. v. N.D. Dep't of Water Resources, et al.
2023 ND 164 |
|
Interest of A.Z.
2023 ND 163 |
|
Disciplinary Board v. Pilch
2023 ND 162 Highlight: Lawyer suspended. |
|
Disciplinary Board v. Pilch
2023 ND 161 Highlight: Lawyer disbarred. |
|
Disciplinary Board v. Overboe
2023 ND 160 Highlight: Lawyer suspended. |
|
Disciplinary Board v. Baird
2023 ND 159 Highlight: Lawyer suspended. |
|
Interest of A.M. (CONFIDENTIAL)(consolidated w/20230210)
2023 ND 158 Highlight: Order terminating parental rights summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), (4), and (7). |
|
Interest of A.B. (CONFIDENTIAL) (consolidated w/20230198 & 20230199)
2023 ND 157 Highlight: A juvenile court order terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4). |
|
Sayler v. Sayler
2023 ND 156
Highlight: A motion to relocate is not necessary when residential responsibility has not previously been established. Therefore, consideration of the Stout-Hawkinson factors is not necessary when the district court originally determines parental responsibility of parents living in different states. |
|
State v. Petersen
2023 ND 155
Highlight: Law enforcement exceeds its community caretaking function when it opens the door of a sleeping occupant’s parked semi-truck and steps onto the running boards in an attempt to gather information without first attempting to get a response from outside of the vehicle. |
|
Estate of Froemke
2023 ND 154 |
|
Davis, et al. v. Mercy Medical Center, et al.
2023 ND 153 |
|
State v. Kollie
2023 ND 152 |
|
Wootan v. State
2023 ND 151
Highlight: Once the State moves for summary judgment on a post-conviction application, the defendant must provide evidentiary support for their application in response to the State’s motion. |
|
Black Elk v. State
2023 ND 150
Highlight: A part must preserve an issue in district court before it can be reviewed on appeal. A party must preserve a claim of error, as it relates to the admissibility of evidence, by objecting or moving to strike the evidence on record and stating a specific ground for exclusion. |
|
Goff v. NDDOT
2023 ND 149 Highlight: Substantially justified means justified to a degree that could satisfy a reasonable person. |
|
Interest of D.M.H. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2023 ND 148 Highlight: Absent a change in circumstances, the juvenile court does not err in adopting a prior visitation schedule as the current visitation schedule. |
|
Hennessey v. Milnor School District
2023 ND 147
Highlight: In an appeal from a motion to dismiss under N.D.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), the complaint is construed in the light most favorable to the plaintiff and well-pleaded allegations are accepted as true. |
|
State, et al. v. Vetter
2023 ND 146 Highlight: Rule 60(a), N.D.R.Civ.P., was designed to allow district courts to correct errors created by oversight or omission. Rule 60(a) does not authorize the court to change what has been deliberately done. |
|
Gonzalez v. Perales
2023 ND 145
Highlight: To be appealable under N.D.C.C. § 28-27-02(1), an order must determine the action and prevent a judgment from which an appeal might be taken. |
|
State v. Larsen (consolidated w/20220375 & 20220376)
2023 ND 144 |
|
DOCR v. Louser, et al.
2023 ND 143
Highlight: The Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation has broad authority under N.D.C.C. § 54-23.3-01 to supervise offenders and probationers when directed by the district court. |
|
Zavanna v. Gadeco, et al.
2023 ND 142 |
|
Edison v. Edison
2023 ND 141 |
|
Legacie-Lowe v. Lowe
2023 ND 140 |
|
Adoption of B.T.H. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2023 ND 139 Highlight: Order and decree terminating parental rights to a minor child and granting a petition for adoption summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
|
Bullinger v. Sundog Interactive, et al.
2023 ND 138 Highlight: A district court must make adequate findings under N.D.R.Civ.P. 52(a)(1) to understand the basis for its decision. |
|
Interest of B.R. (CONFIDENTIAL) (consolidated w/20230187)
2023 ND 137 Highlight: Orders terminating parental rights are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
|
Redpaint v. State
2023 ND 136
Highlight: Postconviction relief is governed by statute, and its proceedings are civil in nature and governed by the North Dakota Rules of Civil Procedure. |
|
Interest of G.R.D.
2023 ND 135 Highlight: A juvenile court’s order placing a child into the custody of the Division of Juvenile Services will not be reversed unless the court’s findings were clearly erroneous. |
|
Otten v. Otten, et. al.
2023 ND 134
Highlight: A district court judgment dividing marital property, weighing the best interest factors and awarding parenting time is affirmed. |
|
Dogbe v. Dogbe, et al.
2023 ND 133
Highlight: To modify a primary residential responsibility order within the two-year period following the entry of the order the movant must make a prima facie case showing the requirements under N.D.C.C. § 14-09-06.6(5). |
|
Hagen v. N.D. Insurance Reserve Fund
2023 ND 132
Highlight: A district court’s review of in-camera documents is reviewed for an abuse of discretion. |
|
Opp v. Office of the North Dakota Attorney General - BCI CWL Unit, et al.
2023 ND 131 |
|
State v. Knight
2023 ND 130
Highlight: A motion for new trial is reviewed for abuse of discretion. |
|
Fleck v. Fleck, et al.
2023 ND 129 |
|
Mickelson, et al. v. City of Rolla
2023 ND 128 Highlight: If an entity violates section 44-04-18, N.D.C.C., an interested person or entity may not file a civil action seeking attorney’s fees or damages, or both, until at least three working days after providing notice of the alleged violation to the chief administrative officer for the public entity under N.D.C.C. § 44-04-21.2(3). |
|
State v. Graff
2023 ND 127 |
|
Interest of Gehlhoff
2023 ND 126 Highlight: When a district court concludes that an individual has a serious difficulty controlling behavior, its findings must identify recent conduct or describe anything that shows the individual has a “present serious difficulty controlling his behavior.” |