Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
7101 - 7150 of 12359 results
|
Zuger v. Zuger
1997 ND 97 |
|
Symington v. Walle Mutual Ins. Co., et al.
1997 ND 93 |
|
Toth v. Disciplinary Board
1997 ND 75 |
|
Moch v. Moch, et al. (CONSOLIDATED W/960179)
1997 ND 69 |
|
State v. Garcia
1997 ND 60 |
|
Estate of Zimmerman
1997 ND 58 |
|
City of Williston v. Hegstad
1997 ND 56 |
|
Lovin v. Lovin
1997 ND 55 |
|
Medcenter One v. ND State Board of Pharmacy
1997 ND 54 |
|
Loll v. Loll, et al.
1997 ND 51 |
|
Traynor, et al. v. Leclerc, et al.
1997 ND 47 |
|
ND Workers Compensation Bureau v. Leclerc
1997 ND 47 |
|
Filler et al. v. Bragg et al.
1997 ND 24 |
|
Bies, f/k/a Obregon v. Obregon
1997 ND 18 |
|
State v. Foster (Consolidated w/960176)
1997 ND 8 |
|
State v. Carlson
1997 ND 7 |
|
Anderson v. A.P.I. Company, et al.
1997 ND 6 |
|
Tormaschy, et al. v. Tormaschy, et al.
1997 ND 2 |
|
State v. Williams
1 7.N.W3 d820 |
|
State v. Rolland
1 1.N.W3 d761 Highlight: Whether a criminal defendant is competent to stand trial is a question of fact reviewed under the clearly erroneous standard. When a court has found a defendant facing felony charges to be unfit to proceed, N.D.C.C. § 12.1-04-08 contemplates attempted rehabilitation. |
|
Anderson v. Foss, et al.
1 0.N.W3 d570
Highlight: A district court did not abuse its discretion when setting the commencement date for the new child support obligation one year from the date of the motion to modify. |
|
McKenzie Electric Coop., Inc. v. El-Dweek, et al.
1 5.N.W3 d12 |
|
Disciplinary Board v. Spencer
003 N.W.3d 122 |
|
Northstar Center v. Lukenbill Family Partnership, et al.
1 4.N.W3 d45
Highlight: Summary judgment should not constitute mini-trials of factual issues and is not appropriate when the court must draw inferences or make findings on disputed facts. |
|
Morales v. Weatherford U.S., et al.
6.N.W3 d657 Highlight: Recovery under a theory of negligence requires a plaintiff to show the defendant owed a duty of care. Whether a duty exists is a legal question to be decided on the facts. Under premises liability law, landowners owe a general duty to lawful entrants to maintain their property in a reasonably safe condition in view of all the circumstances. A landowner's duty to protect entrants upon the land or warn of dangerous conditions is limited when the dangerous condition is known or obvious to the entrant. Roadways present an open and obvious danger to pedestrians of being struck by vehicular traffic. A landowner may have a duty to protect against open and obvious dangers when there is reason to expect that an entrant's attention may be distracted. The distraction exception is not available when the plaintiff is the source of inattention. |
|
Interest of H.J.J.N.
9.N.W3 d656 Highlight: An amended judgment terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
|
Brown v. State
6.N.W3 d823
Highlight: The definition of official detention does not preclude custody while on probation. |
|
Peltier v. State (consolidated w/20230392)
Highlight: A district court's order on petitions is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.35.1(a)(2). |
|
Vacancy in Judgeship No. 8, ECJD
Highlight: Vacancy retained at Fargo |
|
Interest of J.C. (CONFIDENTIAL)(consolidated w/ 20230378)
002 N.W.3d 228 Highlight: A juvenile court errs when it relies on facts which are outside of the evidentiary record when exercising its discretion to terminate parental rights. |
|
Dimmler v. Dimmler, et al.
Highlight: Complete valuation of a remainder interest includes consideration of the debt secured by a mortgage on the real estate. |
|
Albertson v. Albertson
996 N.W.2d 662
Highlight: A district court must specially state facts when granting a disorderly conduct restraining order, which allow a reviewing court to understand the basis of the decision. |
|
State v. Brame
993 N.W.2d 338
Highlight: District courts must substantially comply with N.D.R.Crim.P. 11 to ensure a defendant knowingly and voluntarily enters a guilty plea. |
|
Legacie-Lowe v. Lowe
990 N.W.2d 592 |
|
Goetz v. Goetz, et al.
988 N.W.2d 553 |
|
Martinez v. State
|
|
Queen v. Martel, et al.
980 N.W.2d 914 |
|
Norberg v. Norberg, et al.
977 N.W.2d 711 |
|
Interest of A.C. (CONFIDENTIAL)
975 N.W.2d 567 |
|
Matter of Rose Henderson Peterson Mineral Trust
974 N.W.2d 372 |
|
Disciplinary Board v. Baird (consolidated w/ 20210329-20210330)
|
|
Interest of K.B. (CONFIDENTIAL) (CONSOLIDATED W/20210110)
961 N.W.2d 293 |
|
Ring v. NDDHS
950 N.W.2d 142 Highlight: When ruling on a motion for substitution upon a party’s death, the district court must determine whether the case was extinguished by the death, and if not, whether the party seeking substitution is the proper successor. |
|
Lavallie v. Jay, et al.
945 N.W.2d 288
Highlight: Issues related to subject matter jurisdiction can be raised at any time and cannot be waived. |
|
Atkins v. State
952 N.W.2d 239 Highlight: Court-appointed appellate counsel is not permitted to file an Anders brief in post-conviction relief proceedings. |
|
Cass County Joint Water Resource District v. Aaland, et al.
948 N.W.2d 829
Highlight: Under Rule 8, N.D.R.App.P., the Court has the authority to grant a stay pending appeal. |
|
Matter of Hehn
949 N.W.2d 848 Highlight: Civil commitment decisions require detailed findings, including credibility determinations and references to evidence the court relied on in making its decision. Conclusory, general findings do not comply with N.D.R.Civ.P. 52(a). |
|
Holter v. City of Mandan
946 N.W.2d 524
Highlight: This Court exercises a limited review of a challenge to a municipality’s decision to specially assess property. |
|
Carlson v. Carlson
938 N.W.2d 413
Highlight: Section 14-09-06.2(1)(j), N.D.C.C., creates a rebuttable presumption against awarding custody of a child to a perpetrator of domestic violence if certain criteria is met. |
|
Caster v. State
931 N.W.2d 223
Highlight: District court order summarily denying application for post-conviction relief remanded with instructions for further proceedings. |