Opinions

Muhlbradt, et al. v. Pederson, et al. 2020 ND 187
Docket No.: 20190327
Filing Date: 8/27/2020
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Oil, Gas and Minerals
Author: McEvers, Lisa K. Fair

Highlight: Deeds are construed in the same manner as contracts with the primary purpose to ascertain and effectuate the parties’ or grantor’s intent.

Whether a deed is ambiguous is a question of law, which is fully reviewable on appeal.

Kvande v. Thorson 2020 ND 186
Docket No.: 20190356
Filing Date: 8/27/2020
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Real Property
Author: McEvers, Lisa K. Fair

Highlight: Laches is the delay in enforcing a person’s rights that disadvantages another, and a party asserting laches must prove he was so prejudiced during the delay that he cannot be restored to status quo.

Equitable estoppel cannot be used to create an enforceable agreement between the parties.

City of Glen Ullin, et al. v. Schirado, et al. 2020 ND 185
Docket No.: 20200075
Filing Date: 8/27/2020
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Torts (Negligence, Liab., Nuis.)
Author: Tufte, Jerod E.

Highlight: A district court’s application of res judicata to claims concerning rights to real property is partially affirmed and partially reversed.

Koffler v. Koffler 2020 ND 184
Docket No.: 20190378
Filing Date: 8/27/2020
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Tufte, Jerod E.

Highlight: A child support obligor’s self-induced reduction in income generally does not constitute a material change in circumstances warranting a modification of a child support obligation.

State v. M.J.W. (consol. w/20200009-20200010) 2020 ND 183
Docket No.: 20200008
Filing Date: 8/27/2020
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Drugs/Contraband
Author: Tufte, Jerod E.

Highlight: Section 12-60.1-02(1)(a), N.D.C.C., authorizes an individual to petition the district court to seal a criminal record only when the individual had not been charged with a new crime for at least three years from the date of release from incarceration, parole, or probation.

A district court errs when it grants a petition not authorized by statute.

Woodrock, et al. v. McKenzie Cty. 2020 ND 182
Docket No.: 20200066
Filing Date: 8/27/2020
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Contracts
Author: McEvers, Lisa K. Fair

Highlight: A contract to supply aggregate materials to a county stockpile is not a contract for the “construction of a public improvement” under N.D.C.C. ch. 48-01.2.

The county was not required to obtain a bond from a contractor for a contract to supply aggregate materials to stockpiles under N.D.C.C. § 48-01.2-10.

Gimbel v. Magrum, et al. 2020 ND 181
Docket No.: 20190412
Filing Date: 8/27/2020
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Real Property
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: A district court judgment determining real estate was not acquired by adverse possession or acquiescence is affirmed.

Instasi v. Hiebert 2020 ND 180
Docket No.: 20200037
Filing Date: 8/27/2020
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: McEvers, Lisa K. Fair

Highlight: A court of this state may modify a child custody determination made by a court of another state if the court of the other state determines it no longer has exclusive, continuing jurisdiction or that a court of this state would be a more convenient forum.

Wilkinson, et al. v. Board of University and School Lands of the State of N.D. 2020 ND 179
Docket No.: 20190354
Filing Date: 8/27/2020
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Other
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: Chapter 61-33.1, N.D.C.C., governs the State’s sovereign land mineral ownership of the riverbed segments subject to inundation by the Pick-Sloan Missouri basin project dams and provides a process for determining ownership and returning funds incorrectly paid to the State.

The State does not have any claim or hold title as sovereign lands to any minerals above the ordinary high water mark of the historical Missouri riverbed channel.

When N.D.C.C. ch. 61-33.1 applies to determine ownership of mineral interests, the process provided by the chapter must be followed to decide ownership.

Berg v. Jaeger, et al. 2020 ND 178
Docket No.: 20200184
Filing Date: 8/26/2020
Case Type: Original Proceeding - Civil - Writ of Injunction
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: The supreme court, in exercising its original jurisdiction, may issue a writ of injunction to restrain the commission or continuance of an act.

The five-year residency requirement of N.D. Const. art. V, § 4, relating to holding an executive branch office, does not violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

A person’s legal residence is a question of fact.