Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
1661 - 1670 of 12446 results
State v. Scott
2020 ND 160
Highlight: There is no requirement for the district court to advise defendants they may plead not guilty based on the defense of double jeopardy. |
Laufer v. Doe
2020 ND 159 Highlight: A party seeking recovery of property damage allegedly caused by a pesticide application must strictly comply with statutory notice requirements under N.D.C.C. § 4.1-33-18. |
State v. Metz
2020 ND 158 Highlight: A criminal judgment entered after a jury verdict is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
State v. Banyee (consolidated w/ 20190281)
2020 ND 157 Highlight: A criminal judgment and a judgment denying postconviction relief are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
Harrison v. State
2020 ND 156 Highlight: A district court order denying an application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
State v. Helm
2020 ND 155 Highlight: A defendant raising specific grounds in a N.D.R.Crim.P. 29 motion for judgment of acquittal waives on appeal other grounds not asserted in the district court. |
City of Jamestown v. Schultz
2020 ND 154 Highlight: When an individual has been given a reasonable opportunity to consult with an attorney before deciding to take a chemical test, the individual is not required to be provided with a second chance to consult with an attorney subsequent to making a decision to take the chemical test. |
Norby v. Hinesley, et al.
2020 ND 153
Highlight: A district court’s decision on a motion to relocate is a finding of fact, which will not be reversed on appeal unless it is clearly erroneous. |
Holter v. City of Mandan
2020 ND 152
Highlight: This Court exercises a limited review of a challenge to a municipality’s decision to specially assess property. |
State v. Harstad
2020 ND 151 Highlight: A district court abused its discretion awarding restitution for damages that were not directly related to the criminal conduct. |