Search Tips

Opinions

On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.

1731 - 1740 of 12359 results

Friesz v. State 2020 ND 2
Docket No.: 20190178
Filing Date: 1/23/2020
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A district court order denying an application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

Chatman v. State 2020 ND 1
Docket No.: 20180425
Filing Date: 1/23/2020
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: District court orders summarily denying an application for post–conviction relief, a motion for relief under N.D.R.Civ.P. 60, and a motion for reconsideration are affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6),(7).

Palmer, et al. v. Gentek Building Products, Inc. 2019 ND 306
Docket No.: 20180450
Filing Date: 12/20/2019
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Contracts
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: In a collateral attack of a federal district court’s final judgment in a class action, review is limited to an examination of procedural due process. The court must determine (1) whether there were safeguards in place to guarantee sufficient notice and adequate representation; and (2) whether such safeguards were, in fact, applied.

Vacancy in Judgeship No. 6, South Central Judicial District (consol. 20190346) 2019 ND 305
Docket No.: 20190371
Filing Date: 12/19/2019
Case Type: Judicial Administration - Rule - Rule
Author: Per Curiam

Vacancy in Judgeship No. 7, South Central Judicial District (consol. 20190371) 2019 ND 305
Docket No.: 20190346
Filing Date: 12/19/2019
Case Type: Judicial Administration - Rule - Rule
Author: Per Curiam

Interest of G.L.D. (CONFIDENTIAL) 2019 ND 304
Docket No.: 20190179
Filing Date: 12/18/2019
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Civil Commitment of Sexually Dangerous Individual
Author: Per Curiam

Rath v. Rath 2019 ND 303
Docket No.: 20190211
Filing Date: 12/18/2019
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: District court orders denying a motion for an extension, denying a motion to amend the parenting plan and child support, and denying a motion for relief from order and new trial are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2),(4).

Interest of Voisine 2019 ND 302
Docket No.: 20190155
Filing Date: 12/18/2019
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Civil Commitment of Sexually Dangerous Individual
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: The evidence does not support the conclusion that the civilly committed resident remains a sexually dangerous individual and is clearly erroneous. The order denying the petition for discharge is reversed.

Lessard v. Johnson 2019 ND 301
Docket No.: 20190077
Filing Date: 12/17/2019
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: A district court has discretion in deciding whether to grant a new trial under N.D.R.Civ.P. 59.
When a party moves for a new trial under N.D.R.Civ.P. 59, the party is limited on appeal to review of those issues raised in the motion for a new trial.
A district court’s decision awarding primary residential responsibility for children will not be reversed on appeal unless it is clearly erroneous, and the appellate court will not reweigh the evidence or retry the case.
The district court must equitably distribute the parties’ assets and debts in a divorce action.
A party is entitled to a hearing on a motion for contempt under N.D.C.C. § 27-10-01.3, but the party is required to comply with the procedural requirements of N.D.R.Ct. 3.2 to request a hearing.

State v. Komrosky 2019 ND 300
Docket No.: 20190065
Filing Date: 12/12/2019
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Drugs/Contraband
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: Warrantless discovery of evidence in a defendant’s home is justified under the emergency exception to the warrant requirement if entry was actually motivated by a perceived need to render aid or assistance.

An objective standard of reasonableness is used in determining whether law enforcement had reasonable grounds to believe there was an emergency at hand and an immediate need for their assistance for the protection of life or property.

Plain view is a recognized exception to the warrant requirement, allowing law enforcement officers to seize a clearly incriminating object without a warrant if the officers are lawfully in a position from which they can view an object and the object’s incriminating character is immediately apparent.
Page 174 of 1236