Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
171 - 180 of 12359 results
Interest of W.S., a Child
2024 ND 165 Highlight: A juvenile court order terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
Interest of W.S., a Child
2024 ND 165 Highlight: A juvenile court order terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
State v. Enriquez
2024 ND 164
Highlight: Possession may be actual or constructive, exclusive or joint and may be shown entirely by circumstantial evidence. |
Bolinske v. Sandstrom, et al.
2024 ND 163
Highlight: A district court judgment dismissing a claim of defamation and awarding attorney's fees is affirmed. |
Zundel v. City of Jamestown, et al.
2024 ND 162
Highlight: Retention of and access to court records is a matter of public interest warranting the exercise of this Court's original jurisdiction. |
Burleigh Cty. Social Service Bd. v. Rath
2024 ND 161
Highlight: The doctrine of latches does not apply to child support arrearages. |
Heiser, et al. v. Dahl, et al.
2024 ND 160
Highlight: To satisfy the elements for adverse possession, the acts on which the claimant relies must be actual, visible, continuous, notorious, distinct, and hostile, and of such character to unmistakably indicate an assertion of claim of exclusive ownership by the occupant. |
N.D. Energy Services v. Lime Rock Resources III-A, et al.
2024 ND 159
Highlight: A lease must be read and considered in its entirety so that all of its provisions are taken into consideration to determine the parties' true intent. |
State v. Watts
2024 ND 158
Highlight: When a defendant fails to object to a proposed instruction properly or fails to specifically request an instruction or object to the omission of an instruction, the issue is not adequately preserved for appellate review and the inquiry is limited to whether the jury instructions constitute obvious error affecting substantial rights. |
Nordquist v. Alonge, et al.
2024 ND 157
Highlight: A petitioner for a writ of mandamus must show a clear legal right to performance of the act sought to be compelled and must establish no plain, speedy, and adequate remedy exists in the ordinary course of law. |