Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
901 - 950 of 12418 results
Schmidt v. Hageness, et al.
2022 ND 180 |
Schmidt v. Hageness, et al.
2022 ND 179
Highlight: Dismissal of complaint alleging quiet title to land is summarily affirmed under N.D.C.C. § 32-17-01 because warranty deed failed to meet requirements under N.D.C.C. § 47-10-05. |
Schmidt v. Hageness, et al.
2022 ND 179 |
Queen v. Martel, et al.
2022 ND 178 Highlight: An award of equal residential responsibility of a minor child is remanded to the district court to make specific findings of fact on whether the domestic violence rebuttable presumption under N.D.C.C. § 14-09-06.2(1)(j) is triggered and, if so, whether the presumption is rebutted. |
Queen v. Martel, et al.
2022 ND 178 |
Rekow v. Durheim
2022 ND 177 Highlight: A petitioner for a disorderly conduct restraining order must allege specific facts or threats showing the acts are intended to affect the petitioner's safety, security, or privacy. |
Rekow v. Durheim
2022 ND 177 |
State v. Pieper
2022 ND 176 Highlight: A criminal judgment of driving under the influence and driving under suspension is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P.35.1(a)(2) and (7). |
State v. Pieper
2022 ND 176 |
State v. Lockwood (consolidated w/20220020 & 20220021)
2022 ND 175 Highlight: Three amended criminal judgments are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(8) because the appellant’s brief did not contain the minimum requirements of N.D.R.App.P. 28. |
State v. Lockwood (consolidated w/20220020 & 20220021)
2022 ND 175 |
Interest of T.L.E. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2022 ND 174 Highlight: A district court’s orders for continuing hospitalization and involuntary treatment with medication are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Interest of T.L.E. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2022 ND 174 |
Mayo v. Buchholz, et al.
2022 ND 173 Highlight: A district court order and amended judgment modifying parenting time is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(8). |
Mayo v. Buchholz, et al.
2022 ND 173 |
Gomm v. Winterfeldt, et al.
2022 ND 172
Highlight: Jurisdiction to modify an existing child custody determination is made independent from registration and enforcement of a foreign determination. |
Gomm v. Winterfeldt, et al.
2022 ND 172 |
Whitetail Wave v. XTO Energy, et al.
2022 ND 171
Highlight: There is no right to appeal when there is not a final judgment. |
Whitetail Wave v. XTO Energy, et al.
2022 ND 171 |
Interest of A.C. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2022 ND 169
Highlight: While this Court defers to a tribe on its membership determinations, without consistent and clear factual findings supporting the application of ICWA and North Dakota heightened review for Indian families, this Court is unable to determine the father’s issues on appeal. |
Hendrix, et al. v. Jaeger
2022 ND 168 Highlight: The Secretary of State misapplies the law by excluding qualified elector signatures on circulated petitions on the basis of a determination that a pattern of likely notary violations on some petitions permitted the wholesale invalidation of all signatures on all petitions that were sworn before the same notary. |
Hendrix, et al. v. Jaeger
2022 ND 168 |
Interest of J.G. (CONFIDENTIAL) (consolidated w/20220190)
2022 ND 167 Highlight: A juvenile court order terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
Interest of J.G. (CONFIDENTIAL) (consolidated w/20220190)
2022 ND 167 |
Newfield Exploration Company, et al. v. State, et al.
2022 ND 166
Highlight: An obligation arises from the parties’ contract or the operation of law. |
Newfield Exploration Company, et al. v. State, et al.
2022 ND 166 |
Kershaw v. Finnson, et al.
2022 ND 165
Highlight: Contradictory testimony is resolved in favor of affirmance on appeal. |
Kershaw v. Finnson, et al.
2022 ND 165 |
Sholy v. Cass Cty. Comm’n
2022 ND 164 Highlight: An appeal from a decision of a county commission must be made within thirty days of the decision under N.D.C.C. § 28-34-01(1). The time to appeal commences when the commission votes to approve the decision. |
Sholy v. Cass Cty. Comm’n
2022 ND 164 |
Vogt v. State
2022 ND 163
Highlight: The North Dakota Rules of Civil Procedure are applicable in post-conviction relief proceedings to the extent they do not conflict with the Uniform Postconviction Procedure Act. |
Vogt v. State
2022 ND 163 |
State v. Doglod
2022 ND 162 Highlight: A criminal judgment entered after a jury found the defendant guilty of terrorizing and criminal trespass is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a). |
State v. Doglod
2022 ND 162 |
Dieterle v. Dieterle n/k/a Hansen, et al.
2022 ND 161
Highlight: Orders denying a party permission to file new motions are not appealable. |
Dieterle v. Dieterle n/k/a Hansen, et al.
2022 ND 161 |
State v. Lyman
2022 ND 160
Highlight: Whether to grant a mistrial is within the district court’s discretion, which this Court will not reverse on appeal absent an abuse of such discretion. |
State v. Lyman
2022 ND 160 |
Procive v. WSI
2022 ND 159 Highlight: Under N.D.C.C. § 65-10-01, a claimant may appeal from a final action of Workforce Safety and Insurance to the district court of the county where the injury was inflicted or of the county in which they reside, and the claimant has the burden to show the district court has jurisdiction. |
Procive v. WSI
2022 ND 159 |
Puklich v. Puklich, et al.
2022 ND 158
Highlight: The doctrine of issue preclusion bars relitigation of issues decided in a prior action. |
Puklich v. Puklich, et al.
2022 ND 158 |
State v. Pulkrabek (consolidated with 20220011 - 20220013)
2022 ND 157
Highlight: The Uniform Mandatory Disposition of Detainers Act applies to instances where a detainer has been filed against a person imprisoned in a correctional institution in the state of North Dakota. |
State v. Pulkrabek (consolidated with 20220011 - 20220013)
2022 ND 157 |
Great Plains Royalty Corp. v. Earl Schwartz Co., et al.
2022 ND 156
Highlight: Subject matter jurisdiction refers to the court’s power to hear and determine the general subject involved in the action. |
Great Plains Royalty Corp. v. Earl Schwartz Co., et al.
2022 ND 156 |
State, et al. v. Faber
2022 ND 155
Highlight: A district court may allow a child who is of sufficient maturity to testify about his or her preferences relating to residential responsibility. |
State, et al. v. Faber
2022 ND 155 |
Hamburger v. Hamburger
2022 ND 154
Highlight: A vested child support obligation cannot be retroactively modified. |
Hamburger v. Hamburger
2022 ND 154 |