Opinions

Higgins, et al. v. Lund, et al. 2025 ND 47
Docket No.: 20240083
Filing Date: 2/27/2025
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Oil, Gas and Minerals
Author: Jensen, Jon J.

Highlight: A judgment which adjudicates all claims and does not anticipate or direct further action is appealable.

When interpreting a contract, N.D.C.C. § 9-07-06 provides that the whole of a contract is to be taken together so as to give effect to every part if reasonably practicable. If the granting clause describes the land as being an undivided interest in the land and a subsequent reservation which reserves a fractional part of the "land conveyed," or words of similar import, the reservation will be construed as reserving to the grantor the stated fractional interest of the fraction described in the granting clause.

A Duhig problem does not arise when a grantor, who owns an undivided onehalf (1/2) interest in a parcel of land via partnership, conveys the undivided onehalf (1/2) interest in the land's surface and a one-fourth (1/4) interest in land's minerals but reserves for himself the other one-fourth (1/4) interest in the minerals of the same land.

An oral contract can be enforced only when the parties have agreed on its essential terms. Indefiniteness as to any essential element of the agreement may prevent the creation of an enforceable contract. Stipulations as to the law are also invalid.

Language tying a royalty interest to another interest, such as a one-eighth royalty interest of an eight percent interest, creates a floating royalty.

State v. Williams 2025 ND 46
Docket No.: 20240203
Filing Date: 2/27/2025
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Felony
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: A Brady violation is established when the defendant proves the government possessed evidence favorable to the defendant, the defendant did not possess the evidence and could not have obtained it with reasonable diligence, the prosecution suppressed the evidence, and a reasonable probability exists that the outcome of the proceedings would have been different if the evidence had been disclosed.

To prevail on a Brady claim a defendant must satisfy all four prongs or factors of the legal test.

When an issue is not raised at the trial court, this Court will not address the issue on appeal unless the alleged error rises to the level of obvious error.

A defendant's due process rights may be violated by a prosecutor's actions that constitute misconduct that has a prejudicial effect.

Hoistad v. NDDOT 2025 ND 45
Docket No.: 20240297
Filing Date: 2/27/2025
Case Type: Appeal - Administrative - Department of Transportation
Author: Bahr, Douglas Alan

Highlight: The Department bears the burden of proving a chemical breath test result was fairly administered. If the Department fails to establish compliance with the approved method which goes to the scientific accuracy and reliability of the test, the Department must prove fair administration of the test through expert testimony.

When it is ready for the second breath sample, the Intoxilyzer 8000 displays, "Please Blow Until Tone Stops." The word "until" in this context signifies the point at which the driver should cease blowing into the instrument. Repeatedly blowing into the Intoxilyzer after the tone stopped is contrary to the instructions displayed by the Intoxilyzer 8000 and, thus, the approved method.

Unless the impact of a deviation is within the knowledge of an ordinary person, it is the Department's burden to show through expert testimony whether a deviation from the approved method impacted the accuracy and reliability of the test. An ordinary person does not know what impact, if any, a subject's repeated blowing into the Intoxilyzer after the tone stops has on the test results.

When the officer's deviations from the approved method involve the procedures for collecting and testing the sample, it raises the possibility that the deviation impacted the test result.

Even though the Department's action is not upheld by a court, a party is not entitled to attorney's fees and costs under N.D.C.C. § 28-32-50(1) when the Department acted with substantial justification in its decision.

State v. Plentychief 2025 ND 44
Docket No.: 20240334
Filing Date: 2/27/2025
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Felony
Author: Tufte, Jerod E.

Highlight: Motion to reconsider order of dismissal denied.

Edwards v. State 2025 ND 43
Docket No.: 20240042
Filing Date: 2/13/2025
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: An applicant for postconviction relief based on ineffective assistance of counsel must satisfy the test in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 688-90 (1984). Under Strickland's test, the applicant must show that (1) counsel's representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness and (2) there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different. A reasonable probability is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.

Interest of S.F. 2025 ND 42
Docket No.: 20240337
Filing Date: 2/13/2025
Case Type: Appeal - Juvenile - Termination of Parental Rights
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Juvenile court orders terminating parental rights are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), (4), and (7).

State, et al. v. Carrier 2025 ND 41
Docket No.: 20240210
Filing Date: 2/13/2025
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Bahr, Douglas Alan

Highlight: Child support determinations involve questions of law, which are fully reviewable, findings of fact subject to the clearly erroneous standard, and in some areas, matters of discretion subject to the abuse of discretion standard.

The party seeking to modify a child support obligation has the burden to provide appropriate and reliable information to support a modification of child support.

Issues are not adequately briefed when an appealing party fails to cite any supporting authority, and this Court will not consider them on appeal.

Kingstone v. Tedrow Kingstone 2025 ND 40
Docket No.: 20240143
Filing Date: 2/13/2025
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Parenting Responsibility
Author: Bahr, Douglas Alan

Highlight: Whether an obligor can control the receipt of trust funds is not relevant to whether the funds are income for child support purposes. A court calculating a parent's child support obligation is concerned with whether the parent receives income from the trust.

The child support amount is presumed to be the correct amount, but can be rebutted by a preponderance of the evidence if it is in the best interest of the children and one of the criteria in N.D. Admin. Code § 75-02-04.1-09(2) is met. The court must make specific findings demonstrating why the guideline amount has been rebutted.

A court may order the obligor maintain a life insurance policy as reasonable security for child support payments.

A party moving to amend a judgment under Rule 59, N.D.R.Civ.P., bears a heavy burden of showing sufficient grounds for disturbing the final judgment.

State v. McDermott 2025 ND 39
Docket No.: 20240150
Filing Date: 2/13/2025
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Felony
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A criminal judgment entered after a jury found the defendant guilty of manslaughter and reckless endangerment with a firearm is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

Peterka v. Janda, et al. 2025 ND 38
Docket No.: 20240122
Filing Date: 2/13/2025
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Contracts
Author: Tufte, Jerod E.

Highlight: A district court judgment denying and dismissing a complaint for declaratory judgment is affirmed.

A district court's findings that an individual lacked capacity to enter into the option to purchase does not preclude a finding that the individual was of unsound mind, rendering the option to purchase voidable under N.D.C.C. § 1401-02. The standard to determine whether an individual lacks capacity to enter into a contract is distinct from the standard whether a contract or other conveyance is voidable under N.D.C.C. § 14-01-02.

Gackle v. NDDOT 2025 ND 37
Docket No.: 20240247
Filing Date: 2/13/2025
Case Type: Appeal - Administrative - Department of Transportation
Author: Tufte, Jerod E.

Highlight: A district court judgment affirming an administrative hearing officer's decision to suspend driving privileges for 365 days for driving under the influence of alcohol is reversed.

The North Dakota Department of Transportation fails to show an Intoxilyzer test was fairly administered when an officer's deviation from the approved method was such that the Court cannot say, without expert advice, that the officer's deviation from the approved method did not affect the test results.

When the deviation from the approved method could not have affected the reliability or accuracy of the test results, the deviation does not render the test results inadmissible.

The approved method provides that, upon receiving a result of "Difference Too Great," an "operator shall wait another 20 minutes and ensure the subject has had nothing to eat, drink, or smoke before repeating the Intoxilyzer 8000 test." We interpret "before repeating the Intoxilyzer 8000 test" consistent with the language of the approved method as a whole to require an officer to wait 20 minutes before beginning a subsequent test sequence.

A breath test record showing a period of time less than 20 minutes between test sequences cannot prima facie establish the test was administered in accordance with the approved method because the approved method expressly requires an operator to wait 20 minutes before repeating the test sequence.

Failure to wait 20 minutes before beginning the second testing sequence is the type of deviation from the approved method which may have affected the scientific accuracy or reliability of the test. Absent expert testimony on the likely effect of this deviation, the Department fails to show the test was fairly administered.

Guardianship and Conservatorship of G.I.C. 2025 ND 36
Docket No.: 20240146
Filing Date: 2/13/2025
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Guardian/Conservator
Author: Tufte, Jerod E.

Highlight: A district court order directing distribution of trust assets is reversed.

When a trust agreement provides for specific devises of land but that land is sold prior to the trust's termination, each beneficiary is entitled to a share of the remaining proceeds of the sale of the land proportionate to the value of each beneficiary's specific devises.

Gravity Oilfield Services v. Valence Natural Gas Solutions 2025 ND 35
Docket No.: 20240184
Filing Date: 2/13/2025
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Contracts
Author: Tufte, Jerod E.

Highlight: A district court order granting summary judgment and judgment, and award of attorney's fees are reversed.

State v. Gum 2025 ND 34
Docket No.: 20240331
Filing Date: 2/13/2025
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Drugs/Contraband
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A district court order denying a motion for return of seized property is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7).

Estate of Connolly 2025 ND 33
Docket No.: 20240230
Filing Date: 2/13/2025
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Probate, Wills, Trusts
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A district court's judgment is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4).

Walden v. Walden 2025 ND 32
Docket No.: 20240131
Filing Date: 2/13/2025
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Divorce
Author: McEvers, Lisa K. Fair

Highlight: District courts must consider the Ruff-Fischer guidelines, the needs of the spouse seeking support, and the ability of the other spouse to pay when determining whether to award spousal support. A party who fails to provide evidence of net income waives any argument that he or she did not have the ability to pay spousal support.

A district court considers the Ruff-Fischer factors when distributing marital property. The court must consider the length of a marriage in determining an equitable division of the marital estate under the Ruff-Fischer guidelines. In a short-term marriage, the court may return to the parties what they brought into the marriage, but the division of property and debt must be equitable.

The guiding principle for an award of attorney's fees is one party's need and the other party's ability to pay. The district court may also consider whether a party's actions have unreasonably increased the time and efforts spent on the dispute.

Bullinger v. Sundog Interactive, Inc., et al. 2025 ND 31
Docket No.: 20240188
Filing Date: 2/13/2025
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Other
Author: Jensen, Jon J.

Highlight: A district court erred in its application of N.D.C.C. § 10-19.1-88.

The North Dakota Business Corporations Act, N.D.C.C. ch. 10-19.1, provides significant protections and remedies to minority shareholders. Upon the sale of a corporation, N.D.C.C. § 10-19.1-87 affords dissenting shareholders the option to obtain the fair value of their shares. Section 10-19.1-87, N.D.C.C., outlines the rights of dissenting shareholders and N.D.C.C. § 10-19.1-88 establishes the procedures for payment.

State v. Janachovsky 2025 ND 30
Docket No.: 20240198
Filing Date: 2/13/2025
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Misdemeanor
Author: Jensen, Jon J.

Highlight: A criminal defendant who advises the district court that he intends to represent himself, and does so at each hearing after acknowledging an understanding of the rights afforded to him, constitutes the functional equivalent of a voluntary waiver of counsel.

A defendant knowingly and intelligently waives his right to counsel when he decides to represent himself after being advised the dangers and disadvantages of self-representation.

State v. Littleghost 2025 ND 29
Docket No.: 20240199
Filing Date: 2/13/2025
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Theft
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A criminal judgment entered after a jury convicted the defendant of robbery, accomplice to theft, and theft of a credit device is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (7).

Interest of B.V 2025 ND 28
Docket No.: 20240315
Filing Date: 2/13/2025
Case Type: Appeal - Juvenile - Termination of Parental Rights
Author: Jensen, Jon J.

Highlight: The Indian Child Welfare Act ("ICWA") has no exception for incarceration and neither incarceration nor doubtful prospects for rehabilitation will relieve a Human Service Zone of its duty under ICWA to make active efforts. The circumstances surrounding a parent's incarceration may have a direct bearing on what active efforts are possible.

The juvenile court may consider a Human Service Zone's involvement in its entirety in evaluating active efforts rather than focusing on efforts directed at each parent individually.

ICWA does not clarify the scope of the expert testimony required, nor does it require that the expert testimony provide the sole basis for the juvenile court's conclusion.

Interest of B.V. 2025 ND 28
Docket No.: 20240316
Filing Date: 2/13/2025
Case Type: Appeal - Juvenile - Termination of Parental Rights
Author: Jensen, Jon J.

Highlight: The Indian Child Welfare Act ("ICWA") has no exception for incarceration and neither incarceration nor doubtful prospects for rehabilitation will relieve a Human Service Zone of its duty under ICWA to make active efforts. The circumstances surrounding a parent's incarceration may have a direct bearing on what active efforts are possible.

The juvenile court may consider a Human Service Zone's involvement in its entirety in evaluating active efforts rather than focusing on efforts directed at each parent individually.

ICWA does not clarify the scope of the expert testimony required, nor does it require that the expert testimony provide the sole basis for the juvenile court's conclusion.

Almklov v. State 2025 ND 27
Docket No.: 20240166
Filing Date: 2/13/2025
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Jensen, Jon J.

Highlight: A district court's order summarily dismissing an application for postconviction relief is affirmed.

Access Independent Health Services, Inc., d/b/a Red River Women's Clinic. et al. v. Wrigley, et al. 2025 ND 26
Docket No.: 20240291
Filing Date: 1/24/2025
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Constitutional Law
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Berger v. Repnow 2025 ND 25
Docket No.: 20240147
Filing Date: 1/23/2025
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Divorce - Property
Author: McEvers, Lisa K. Fair

Highlight: The law on partition of property, N.D.C.C. ch. 32-16, controls the distribution of property accumulated by unmarried partners and cohabitants. Although legal ownership of property is strong evidence of an intention to not share property, legal ownership is not dispositive when the person who is not the legal owner has financially contributed to the acquisition of the property.

Section 32-16-01, N.D.C.C., authorizes proceedings to partition property according to the respective rights of the persons interested therein and for a sale of such property or a part thereof, if it appears that a partition cannot be made without great prejudice to the owners. Real and personal property may be partitioned in the same action.

Five elements are required to establish unjust enrichment: 1. An enrichment; 2. An impoverishment; 3. A connection between the enrichment and the impoverishment; 4. Absence of a justification for the enrichment and impoverishment; and 5. An absence of a remedy provided by law.

A reviewing court needs to know the reasons for the trial court's decision before it can intelligently rule on the issues, and if the trial court does not provide an adequate explanation of the evidentiary and legal basis for its decision, the reviewing court is left to merely speculate whether it properly applied the law.

State v. McCleary 2025 ND 24
Docket No.: 20240171
Filing Date: 1/23/2025
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Theft
Author: McEvers, Lisa K. Fair

Highlight: Application of the Uniform Mandatory Disposition of Detainers Act is limited to those instances where a detainer has been filed against a person imprisoned in a penal or correctional institution in North Dakota already serving a sentence within the state.

The UMDDA does not apply to prisoners who have been released on parole because the person is no longer imprisoned serving a sentence for a term of commitment.

A defendant who stipulates the statutory habitual offender requirements were met waives any alleged procedural defects by the district court in applying the habitual offender sentencing enhancements.

First National Bank of Omaha v. Yates 2025 ND 23
Docket No.: 20240274
Filing Date: 1/23/2025
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Contracts
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: An order denying a motion for relief from judgment is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1).

State v. Henderson 2025 ND 22
Docket No.: 20240118
Filing Date: 1/23/2025
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Drugs/Contraband
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A criminal judgment entered following a jury verdict is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (7).

Meiers v. NDDOT 2025 ND 21
Docket No.: 20240215
Filing Date: 1/23/2025
Case Type: Appeal - Administrative - Department of Transportation
Author: Bahr, Douglas Alan

Highlight: Section 39-20-04.1, N.D.C.C., provides the Department with authority to suspend a driver's driving privileges. Section 39-20-03.1(4), N.D.C.C., lists procedures a law enforcement officer must follow when a person has tested over the legal limit for driving under the influence.

An officer's non-compliance with a provision of N.D.C.C. § 39-20-03.1(4) does not impact the Department's authority to suspend a driver's driving privileges unless the provision is basic and mandatory. A provision is basic and mandatory if it mirrors a provision of N.D.C.C. § 39-20-04.1(1).

A provision of N.D.C.C. § 39-20-03.1(4) mirrors a provision of N.D.C.C. § 39-20-04.1(1) when the officer's compliance with the provision provides to the Department information important to the Department in determining its authority to suspend a license.

The requirement in N.D.C.C. § 39-20-03.1(4) that the copy of the checklist and test records of a breath test be "certified" is not a basic and mandatory provision impacting the Department's authority to suspend a driver's driving privileges.

Hillerson v. Baker 2025 ND 20
Docket No.: 20240214
Filing Date: 1/23/2025
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Divorce
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A district court judgment, order for contempt, and order for attorney's fees, are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) & (4).

Gooss v. A.K. 2025 ND 19
Docket No.: 20240157
Filing Date: 1/23/2025
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Other
Author: Tufte, Jerod E.

Highlight: A disorderly conduct restraining order is affirmed.

Before a court grants a petition for a disorderly conduct restraining order, the court must conduct a full hearing. N.D.C.C. § 12.1-31.2-01(4). The full hearing contemplated by N.D.C.C. § 12.1-31.2-01 is a special summary proceeding, intended to quickly and effectively combat volatile situations before any tragic escalation.

The concern for expeditious proceedings should not override the need to fairly resolve factual disputes. When the court employs a procedure which fails to afford a party a meaningful and reasonable opportunity to present evidence on the relevant issues, the court has abused its discretion and violated the party's due process rights.

Davis, et al. v. Romanyshyn 2025 ND 18
Docket No.: 20240167
Filing Date: 1/23/2025
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Other
Author: Jensen, Jon J.

Highlight: A disorderly conduct restraining order may not be granted without a full evidentiary hearing. It is better practice for a petitioner to present evidence through testimony, rather than through an inadmissible affidavit and petition. The respondent shall have an opportunity to contest the restraining order by offering admissible evidence or through cross-examination.

A disorderly conduct restraining order must not conflict with a parental responsibility order.

State v. Ruot 2025 ND 17
Docket No.: 20240193
Filing Date: 1/23/2025
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Child Abuse/Child Neglect
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A criminal judgment entered after a jury convicted the defendant of child abuse is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7).

State v. Jackson 2025 ND 16
Docket No.: 20240234
Filing Date: 1/23/2025
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Homicide
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A criminal judgment entered after a jury verdict is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

Windyboy v. State 2025 ND 15
Docket No.: 20240204
Filing Date: 1/9/2025
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A district court judgment denying an application for postconviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

Estate of Moe 2025 ND 14
Docket No.: 20240197
Filing Date: 1/9/2025
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Probate, Wills, Trusts
Author: Bahr, Douglas Alan

Highlight: Reformation of a will is an equitable remedy designed to give effect to the testator's intention and to prevent unjust enrichment.

When the court is determining whether to reform the terms of a will, the relevant inquiry is the testator's intention at the time the testator executed the will.

In reformation cases, a court may consider direct evidence and relevant extrinsic evidence as it pertains to the testator's intention at the time of execution. Post-execution evidence must relate to the testator's intent at the time of execution

Juneau v. State 2025 ND 13
Docket No.: 20240110
Filing Date: 1/9/2025
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Bahr, Douglas Alan

Highlight: A sentence is imposed in an illegal manner if the sentencing court does not observe rules or statutes providing procedural safeguards.

When an applicant seeks to withdraw a guilty plea in an application for postconviction relief, the application is treated as one made under N.D.R.Crim.P. 11(d), and the district court considers whether relief is necessary to correct a manifest injustice.

Rule 11 provisions are mandatory, and substantial compliance is required to ensure a defendant knowingly and voluntarily enters a guilty plea.

State v. Woodman 2025 ND 12
Docket No.: 20240037
Filing Date: 1/9/2025
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Sexual Offense
Author: Bahr, Douglas Alan

Highlight: Obvious error review consists of determining whether (1) there was an error, (2) that was plain, and (3) that affected a party's substantial rights. Obvious error review is applied only to prevent an unjust conviction, or the exceptional situations where the defendant has suffered serious injustice.

When a defendant fails to object to a proposed instruction properly, or fails to specifically request an instruction or object to the omission of an instruction, the issue is not adequately preserved for appellate review and our inquiry is limited to whether the jury instructions constitute obvious error affecting substantial rights.

When prosecutorial misconduct is raised for the first time on appeal, review is limited to determining whether the prosecutor's conduct prejudicially affected the defendant's substantial rights, so as to deprive the defendant of a fair trial.

Review on appeal of a sentence is generally confined to whether the district court acted within the statutory sentencing limits or substantially relied on an impermissible factor.

Interest of E.E. 2025 ND 11
Docket No.: 20240321
Filing Date: 1/9/2025
Case Type: Appeal - Juvenile - Termination of Parental Rights
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: An appeal from a juvenile court order terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4).

State v. Greene 2025 ND 10
Docket No.: 20240128
Filing Date: 1/9/2025
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Sexual Offense
Author: Tufte, Jerod E.

Highlight: A criminal judgment entered after a defendant pleaded guilty to eleven sexual offenses is affirmed.

Generally, an open plea waives all non-jurisdictional claims and defenses, including multiplicity challenges.

Only in an extraordinary case will a sentence for a term of imprisonment within the statutory sentencing limits violate the Eighth Amendment's prohibition against cruel and unusual punishments.

Nelson v. Pine View First Addition Association 2025 ND 9
Docket No.: 20240160
Filing Date: 1/9/2025
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Contracts
Author: Tufte, Jerod E.

Highlight: A district court's order granting a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction is reversed.

A court considers five factors when assessing whether a nonresident defendant has sufficient minimum contacts with North Dakota so the exercise of personal jurisdiction does not offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice: (1) the nature and quality of a nonresident defendant's contacts with North Dakota; (2) the quantity of the nonresident defendant's contacts with North Dakota; (3) the relation of the cause of action to the contacts; (4) North Dakota's interest in providing a forum for its residents; and (5) the convenience of the parties. While the first three factors are of primary concern, the fourth and fifth factors are of only secondary importance and are not determinative.

Under N.D.R.Civ.P. 11(c)(5)(A), a district court shall not impose monetary sanctions against a represented party for violating Rule 11(b)(2).

A district court abuses its discretion by denying a party's motion for attorney's fees when the party prevails on a Rule 11 motion that is contrary to the plain language of Rule 11.

Hollingsworth v. Hollingsworth 2025 ND 8
Docket No.: 20240161
Filing Date: 1/9/2025
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Divorce
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: An unequal property distribution must be adequately explained by the district court.

Valuation of marital assets must be within the range of evidence presented.

A district court must apply the Ruff-Fischer guidelines when determining property distribution and spousal support in a divorce proceeding.

The proper remedy for unfair surprise is a continuance.

Glaum v. Woodrow 2025 ND 7
Docket No.: 20240153
Filing Date: 1/9/2025
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Other
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A district court judgment dismissing a civil case is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

Reile v. WSI, et. al. 2025 ND 6
Docket No.: 20240135
Filing Date: 1/9/2025
Case Type: Appeal - Administrative - Workers Compensation
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: The authority of an administrative agency to adopt administrative rules is authority delegated by the legislative assembly. A properly promulgated regulation has the force and effect of law. A regulation that exceeds or supersedes an agency's statutory authority or conflicts with the statute it implements is invalid. The rationale for this principle is that allowing an administrative agency to promulgate rules that include substantive matters not included in the statute under which it is acting constitutes an improper delegation of legislative power. The legislature has not specifically authorized WSI to promulgate rules regulating the proof required to establish compensability for a mental or psychological condition. WSI exceeded its authority when it promulgated a rule imposing specific burdens and limitations not present in the statute the rule implements.

Interest of R.S. 2025 ND 5
Docket No.: 20240341
Filing Date: 1/9/2025
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Mental Health
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A district court's continuing treatment order is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

Poseley v. Homer Township, et al. 2025 ND 4
Docket No.: 20240174
Filing Date: 1/9/2025
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Real Property
Author: McEvers, Lisa K. Fair

Highlight: A judgment is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6) and (7).

An aggrieved party must appeal a local governing body's decision rather than seek injunctive or declaratory relief against the enforcement of the decision.

Under N.D.R.Civ.P. 54(e)(2), a claim for attorney's fees not determined by the judgment must be made by motion within 21 days after notice of entry of judgment.

State v. Thompson 2025 ND 3
Docket No.: 20240117
Filing Date: 1/9/2025
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Terrorizing
Author: McEvers, Lisa K. Fair

Highlight: A district court may exclude otherwise relevant evidence if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice or confusing the issues. A court's power to exclude relevant evidence should be exercised sparingly.

Issues not raised or considered in the district court cannot be raised for the first time on appeal. However, newly raised issues may be addressed on appeal if the issue rises to the level of obvious error. The discretion to notice obvious error in an appeal when the defendant does not raise the issue of obvious error need not be exercised, because it is the defendant's burden to show an obvious error that affects a substantial right.

The scope of cross-examination is within the district court's discretion, the propriety of which will not be disturbed on appeal absent an abuse of discretion. Reasonable limits may be placed on a defendant's cross-examination, including the exclusion of irrelevant evidence.

Tiah v. State 2025 ND 2
Docket No.: 20240216
Filing Date: 1/9/2025
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: An amended judgment denying applications for postconviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

Tiah v. State 2025 ND 2
Docket No.: 20240217
Filing Date: 1/9/2025
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: An amended judgment denying applications for postconviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

Tiah v. State 2025 ND 2
Docket No.: 20240218
Filing Date: 1/9/2025
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: An amended judgment denying applications for postconviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

State v. Caspers 2025 ND 1
Docket No.: 20240124
Filing Date: 1/9/2025
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Felony
Author: Jensen, Jon J.

Highlight: Under N.D.C.C. § 12.1-32-06.1, a defendant cannot be ordered to a third period of probation. The statute allows for an initial period of probation and one additional period of probation not to exceed five years.

A district court order denying in part a motion for reduced sentence is affirmed.

City of Fargo v. State 2024 ND 236
Docket No.: 20240125
Filing Date: 12/19/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Other
Author: Bahr, Douglas Alan

Highlight: A home rule city's power to enact ordinances that supersede state law is not without limitation because a home rule city's powers must be based upon statutory provisions.

Cities are creatures of statute and possess only those powers and authorities granted by statute or necessarily implied from an express statutory grant.

Hoff v. State 2024 ND 235
Docket No.: 20240158
Filing Date: 12/19/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Bahr, Douglas Alan

Highlight: A postconviction relief application barred by the two-year limitation in N.D.C.C. § 29-32.1-01(2) is not excepted by N.D.C.C. § 29-32.1-01(3) when the applicant demonstrates a physical disability or mental disease does not preclude timely assertion of their application for relief.

Although Rule 615, N.D.R.Ev., uses the plural term "witnesses," the plural term "witnesses" is interpreted to include the singular term "witness." Therefore, a party may request to sequester a single witness.

Hoff v. State 2024 ND 235
Docket No.: 20240159
Filing Date: 12/19/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Bahr, Douglas Alan

Highlight: A postconviction relief application barred by the two-year limitation in N.D.C.C. § 29-32.1-01(2) is not excepted by N.D.C.C. § 29-32.1-01(3) when the applicant demonstrates a physical disability or mental disease does not preclude timely assertion of their application for relief.

Although Rule 615, N.D.R.Ev., uses the plural term "witnesses," the plural term "witnesses" is interpreted to include the singular term "witness." Therefore, a party may request to sequester a single witness.

Adoption of H.W.L. 2024 ND 234
Docket No.: 20240289
Filing Date: 12/19/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Juvenile - Termination of Parental Rights
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A district court order terminating parental rights and granting a petition for adoption is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App. 35.1(a)(2) and (4).

Overbo v. Overbo, et al. 2024 ND 233
Docket No.: 20240164
Filing Date: 12/19/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Constitutional Law
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: The party presentation principle requires courts refrain from deciding constitutional questions not submitted by the litigants.

Sanderson v. Agotness 2024 ND 232
Docket No.: 20240054
Filing Date: 12/19/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Other
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: A judge acting within their judicial capacity is protected by judicial immunity.

The prevailing party of a frivolous action shall be awarded attorney's fees.

State v. Eagleman 2024 ND 231
Docket No.: 20240176
Filing Date: 12/19/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Reckless Endangerment
Author: Jensen, Jon J.

Highlight: While we have previously treated motions filed under the rules of criminal procedure as applications under the Uniform Postconviction Procedure Act, we have done so in the limited circumstance where the defendant has filed a previous application for postconviction relief and the filing in the criminal case hints at an attempt to "avoid the procedures of the Uniform Postconviction Procedure Act."

It is not proper for a defendant to collaterally attack the underlying conviction by way of a motion to correct an illegal sentence because the "Uniform Postconviction Procedure Act is the exclusive remedy for collaterally challenging a judgment of conviction or sentence . . . ."

Interest of A.E.E. 2024 ND 230
Docket No.: 20240121
Filing Date: 12/19/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Guardian/Conservator
Author: Jensen, Jon J.

Highlight: Under N.D.C.C. § 27-20.1-16(2), any party to the proceeding in which the child's status was adjudicated may petition for removal or modification of a guardian on the grounds the removal or modification would be in the best interest of the child. If an insufficient showing has been made, the district court shall issue an order denying the petition.

State v. Werner 2024 ND 229
Docket No.: 20240084
Filing Date: 12/19/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - DUI/DUS/APC
Author: Jensen, Jon J.

Highlight: Investigative stops of a vehicle and its occupants for suspected violations of law will be upheld if officers have at least a reasonable suspicion that the motorist has violated the law or probable cause to believe the motorist has done so. The suspected violation of law need not be related to the current operation of a motor vehicle.

Reasonable suspicion for a stop exists when a reasonable person in the officer's position would be justified by some objective manifestation to suspect potential unlawful activity. The reasonable suspicion standard is objective and does not hinge upon the subjective beliefs or motivations of the arresting officer. In order to determine whether an investigative stop is valid, we consider the totality of the circumstances and examine the information known to the officer at the time of the stop.

An officer is required to administer the Miranda warning when a person is subject to custodial interrogation. A suspect is in custody when there is a formal arrest or restraint on the suspect's freedom of movement to the degree associated with a formal arrest. When determining if a person is subject to custodial interrogation, the court examines all circumstances surrounding the interrogation and considers what a reasonable man in the suspect's position would have understood in his situation.

Lindeman v. State 2024 ND 228
Docket No.: 20240058
Filing Date: 12/19/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Jensen, Jon J.

Highlight: To succeed on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, the petitioner must first prove his counsel's performance was defective. Second, the petitioner must show his defense was prejudiced by the proven defects. Both must be established in order to prevail under a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. Thus, if there is an insufficient showing on one, the reviewing court need not address the other.

McKenzie Electric Coop., Inc. v. El-Dweek, et al. 2024 ND 227
Docket No.: 20240275
Filing Date: 12/19/2024
Case Type: Original Proceeding - Civil - Writ of Supervision
Author: Tufte, Jerod E.

Highlight: A petition for supervisory writ directing the district court to vacate its order of recusal, deny the motion for recusal, and reassign the action back to Judge ElDweek is denied.

Cass Co. v. KNB Properties, et al. 2024 ND 226
Docket No.: 20240126
Filing Date: 12/19/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Other
Author: Tufte, Jerod E.

Highlight: A district court's grant of summary judgment for plaintiff is affirmed.

A district court's grant of permanent injunction for plaintiff is reversed.

Zoning and subdivision ordinances serve distinct but complementary regulatory purposes. A township has exclusive zoning authority over private property within the township under N.D.C.C. § 58-03-11, and the location of buildings and attendant improvements is a zoning matter. A county may, however, as a valid exercise of its subdivision authority under N.D.C.C. § 1133.2-02, condition its approval of a subdivision on compliance with the county's subdivision ordinance, even when provisions of the ordinance govern the location of buildings and attendant improvements.

By operating as a condition on a county's approval of the act of subdivision, a subdivision ordinance's setback provisions do not function as a direct zoning regulation in conflict with a township's exclusive zoning authority.

A county's subdivision authority begins when an action is taken to divide a parcel into two or more parts.

When a party subdivides property in violation of a subdivision ordinance, the proper remedy is to vacate the subdivision by voiding the acts that triggered applicability of the subdivision ordinance and were dependent on the county's approval.

Olson v. Olson 2024 ND 224
Docket No.: 20240103
Filing Date: 12/5/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Divorce - Property
Author: Bahr, Douglas Alan

Highlight: A party had access to an attorney under N.D.C.C. § 14-03.2-08 when the party was made aware of the need for a premarital agreement long before the wedding.

A party received adequate financial disclosure under N.D.C.C. § 14-03.208 when the party observed the other party's day-to-day involvement connected to the other party's assets and had the opportunity to review balance sheets.

A party's consent is voluntary and not the result of duress when the party has the knowledge and experience to understand the contents of a premarital agreement and had been aware of the need for an agreement.

A party arguing a premarital agreement is substantively unconscionable must argue a term of the agreement is substantively unconscionable.

This Court reviews a district court's decision to allow an undisclosed witness to testify under an abuse of discretion standard.

Although the sequestration rule applies to rebuttal witnesses, a district court has discretion to allow a rebuttal witness to testify when the testimony is not negatively influenced by or inappropriately tailored to prior testimony.

Lowe v. WSI 2024 ND 223
Docket No.: 20240189
Filing Date: 12/5/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Administrative - Workers Compensation
Author: Tufte, Jerod E.

Highlight: Workforce Safety and Insurance did not abuse its discretion by denying a request for approval of daily opioid medication in excess of 90 Morphine Milligram Equivalents. The district court judgment affirming WSI's managed care binding dispute resolution decision is affirmed.

State v. Johnson 2024 ND 222
Docket No.: 20240156
Filing Date: 12/5/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Sexual Offense
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: Under N.D.R.App.P. 28 a party is required to include legal authorities on which the party relies. During oral argument a party may not raise new claims or rely on legal authorities not contained in their brief.

A district court's substantial compliance with N.D.R.Crim.P. 11 is determined on the record as a whole.

An ineffective assistance of counsel claim generally should be brought in a postconviction relief proceeding.

Poseley v. Homer Township 2024 ND 221
Docket No.: 20240154
Filing Date: 12/5/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Administrative - Zoning
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: An order dismissing an appeal from a local governing body's decision is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7).

State v. Graff 2024 ND 220
Docket No.: 20230409
Filing Date: 12/5/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Sexual Offense
Author: Jensen, Jon J.

Highlight: An order dismissing the matter without prejudice following a finding of prosecutorial misconduct is affirmed.

Although the district court has some supervisory control over dismissals, the court should not dismiss a case with prejudice unless the court has had an opportunity to determine issues of bad faith, harassment, or misconduct, and this finding must be supported by clear and convincing evidence.

Generally, dismissal with prejudice is a remedy that should only be used in extreme circumstances.

State v. Thesing 2024 ND 219
Docket No.: 20240093
Filing Date: 12/5/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Misdemeanor
Author: Jensen, Jon J.

Highlight: Section 12.1-31.2-02, N.D.C.C., permits an individual to be charged for violating a pre-dispositional order when the alleged violation occurs while the individual is in custody.

A pre-dispositional order issued under N.D.C.C. § 12.1-31.2-02(1) differs from a condition of release issued under N.D.R.Crim.P. 46(a)(2)(E).

An argument not adequately articulated, supported, and briefed will not be considered by this Court.

State v. Grensteiner 2024 ND 218
Docket No.: 20240100
Filing Date: 12/5/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Felony
Author: McEvers, Lisa K. Fair

Highlight: Probable cause for a driven vehicle extends to a towed vehicle.

Possession may be actual or constructive, exclusive or joint, and may be shown entirely by circumstantial evidence. To prove constructive possession the State must present evidence which establishes that the accused had the power and capability to exercise dominion and control over the contraband.

When there is a claim of prosecutorial misconduct, the Court determines whether the prosecutor's actions were misconduct and, if they were, whether the misconduct had prejudicial effect. Comments intended to highlight the weaknesses of a defendant's case do not shift the burden of proof. The Court presumes that the jury followed the district court's instructions.

State v. Grensteiner 2024 ND 218
Docket No.: 20240101
Filing Date: 12/5/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Felony
Author: McEvers, Lisa K. Fair

Highlight: Probable cause for a driven vehicle extends to a towed vehicle.

Possession may be actual or constructive, exclusive or joint, and may be shown entirely by circumstantial evidence. To prove constructive possession the State must present evidence which establishes that the accused had the power and capability to exercise dominion and control over the contraband.

When there is a claim of prosecutorial misconduct, the Court determines whether the prosecutor's actions were misconduct and, if they were, whether the misconduct had prejudicial effect. Comments intended to highlight the weaknesses of a defendant's case do not shift the burden of proof. The Court presumes that the jury followed the district court's instructions.

State v. Gothberg 2024 ND 217
Docket No.: 20240138
Filing Date: 12/5/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Felony
Author: McEvers, Lisa K. Fair

Highlight: Ordinarily in cases involving consent to enter a home, entry is preceded by an exchange between a police officer and an occupant in which the officer makes an inquiry and in response the occupant verbally or physically reacts in a manner that may be interpreted as consent. Absent verbal consent, the State must show affirmative conduct by the person alleged to have consented that is consistent with the giving of consent, rather than merely showing that the person took no affirmative actions to stop the police.

The existence of consent is a question of fact to be determined from the totality of the circumstances. The scope of an individual's consent is determined by considering what an objectively reasonable person would have understood the consent to include.

Whether consent was voluntarily given considers examination of the totality of the circumstances at the time it was given.

Factors that may be considered in determining the totality of the circumstances are the characteristics and condition of the accused at the time of consent and the details of the setting in which consent was obtained, though no one factor is determinative.

Judicial Conduct Commission v. Hagen 2024 ND 216
Docket No.: 20240282
Filing Date: 11/21/2024
Case Type: Discipline - Judge - Other
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Judge Admonished

Chase v. State 2024 ND 215
Docket No.: 20240024
Filing Date: 11/21/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Tufte, Jerod E.

Highlight: A district court order denying an amended application for postconviction relief is affirmed.

The affirmative defenses of res judicata and the statute of limitations are waived by the State when not raised in its answer to an application for postconviction relief.

To trigger the presumption of prejudice arising from improper jury contact, an applicant must first establish that the improper contact actually occurred.

Sanchez v. State 2024 ND 214
Docket No.: 20240173
Filing Date: 11/21/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A district court judgment denying postconviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7).

RMM Properties v. City of Minot 2024 ND 213
Docket No.: 20240130
Filing Date: 11/21/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Administrative - Zoning
Author: Bahr, Douglas Alan

Highlight: A court's review is very limited in an appeal from a local governing body's decision. The supreme court's function is to independently determine the propriety of the local governing body's decision, without any special deference to the district court's decision.

The decision of a local governing body must be affirmed unless the local body acted arbitrarily, capriciously or unreasonably, or if there is not substantial evidence supporting the decision.

Chapters 40-39 and 40-50.1, N.D.C.C., are intended to accomplish different tasks, and each provides its own method to protect public rights in streets, alleys, and public grounds. Section 40-39-05, N.D.C.C., applies when a petition seeks only to vacate "public grounds, streets, alleys, or parts thereof." Section 40-50.1-16, N.D.C.C., applies when all owners of lots in a plat seek to vacate the plat or part of the plat containing "public rights in the streets, alleys, easements, and public grounds."

Northstar Center v. Lukenbill Family Partnership, et al. 2024 ND 212
Docket No.: 20240034
Filing Date: 1/24/2025
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Contracts
Author: Bahr, Douglas Alan

Northstar Center v. Lukenbill Family Partnership, et al. 2024 ND 212
Docket No.: 20240034
Filing Date: 2/14/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Contracts
Author: Bahr, Douglas Alan

Highlight: Summary judgment should not constitute mini-trials of factual issues and is not appropriate when the court must draw inferences or make findings on disputed facts.

The elements of a prima facie case for breach of contract are: (1) the existence of a contract; (2) breach of the contract; and (3) damages which flow from the breach. A breach of contract is the nonperformance of a contractual duty when it is due. While construction of a written contract to determine its legal effect presents a question of law, whether a party has breached a contract is a finding of fact.

An interference with contract claim contemplates a tortfeasor who either prevented a third party from entering into a contract or induced the third party to breach the contract with the plaintiff. To establish a prima facie case for intentional interference with contract, a plaintiff must prove (1) a contract existed, (2) the contract was breached, (3) the defendant instigated the breach, and (4) the defendant instigated the breach without justification.

To prevail on an intentional interference with contract claim, the plaintiff must show the defendant acted intentionally, and the intent required goes beyond the traditional tort concept of intent. The plaintiff must show the defendant specifically intended to interfere with the plaintiff's contractual rights, or acted with knowledge that the interference would result. A party's intent generally presents a question of fact.

An indemnity is a contract by which one engages to save another from a legal consequence of the conduct of one of the parties or of some other person. Indemnification is a remedy which allows a party to recover reimbursement from another for the discharge of a liability which, as between them, should have been discharged by the other.

State v. Villazana 2024 ND 211
Docket No.: 20230307
Filing Date: 11/21/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Homicide
Author: McEvers, Lisa K. Fair

Highlight: Under N.D.R.Ev. 404(b), district courts are to apply a three-step analysis to determine whether the evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts is admissible: 1) the court must look to the purpose for which the evidence is introduced; 2) the evidence of the prior act or acts must be substantially reliable or clear and convincing; and 3) in criminal cases, there must be proof of the crime charged which permits the trier of fact to establish the defendant's guilt or innocence independently on the evidence presented, without consideration of the evidence of the prior acts.

Under N.D.R.Crim.P. 52, any error, defect, irregularity or variance that does not affect substantial rights must be disregarded. When reviewing a nonconstitutional trial error, the objective is to determine whether the error was so prejudicial that substantial injury occurred and a different decision would have resulted without the error.

Under N.D.R.Ev. 103(a)(1)(B), an objection to the introduction of evidence must state the specific ground of the objection unless it was apparent from the context.

Only issues that have been thoroughly briefed and argued are considered on appeal.

The standard of review for reconciling a jury verdict is whether the verdict is legally inconsistent. Strict standards of logical consistency need not be applied to jury verdicts in criminal cases. Reconciliation of a verdict includes an examination of both the law and the case in order to determine whether the verdict is logical and probable, and therefore consistent, or illogical and clearly contrary to the evidence.

Even if a jury fails to convict a defendant on a charge having a similar element to a charge on which the defendant is convicted, there is no legal inconsistency if there is substantial evidence to support the charge on which he is convicted. 1Jury instructions agreed to by a defendant become the law of the case.

State v. Ford 2024 ND 210
Docket No.: 20240074
Filing Date: 11/21/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Assault
Author: McEvers, Lisa K. Fair

Highlight: When the record on direct appeal is inadequate to determine whether the defendant received ineffective assistance of counsel, the defendant may pursue the ineffectiveness claim at a postconviction proceeding where an adequate record can be made.

A criminal judgment is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (7).

Bott v. Bott 2024 ND 209
Docket No.: 20240070
Filing Date: 11/21/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Divorce - Property
Author: McEvers, Lisa K. Fair

Highlight: A district court does not have continuing jurisdiction over a final property distribution.

Nevertheless, a final property division in a divorce may be modified in the same manner and on the same grounds as other judgments including a motion pursuant to N.D.R.Civ.P. 60.

Extraordinary circumstances are required for N.D.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(6) to be invoked.

If the judgment sought to be set aside was entered based on a stipulation of the parties, the party challenging the judgment has the additional burden of showing under the law of contracts there is justification for setting aside the stipulation.

On appeal, only considered is a determination of whether the district court abused its discretion in ruling that sufficient grounds for disturbing the finality of a judgment were not established, not whether the court was substantively correct in entering the judgment from which relief was sought.

Nelson, et al. v. Lindvig, et al. 2024 ND 208
Docket No.: 20230257
Filing Date: 11/21/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Oil, Gas and Minerals
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: A person must have a reasonable claim to an interest or estate in real property to maintain a quiet title action.

A person without an interest or estate in real property cannot simultaneously voluntarily join a quiet title action and seek attorney's fees by claiming the action is frivolous.

An award of attorney's fees is reviewed under the abuse of discretion standard.

Nelson, et al. v. Persons Unknown, et al. 2024 ND 208
Docket No.: 20240106
Filing Date: 11/21/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Other
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: A person must have a reasonable claim to an interest or estate in real property to maintain a quiet title action.

A person without an interest or estate in real property cannot simultaneously voluntarily join a quiet title action and seek attorney's fees by claiming the action is frivolous.

An award of attorney's fees is reviewed under the abuse of discretion standard.

Disciplinary Board v. Spencer (Interim Suspension) 2024 ND 207
Docket No.: 20240307
Filing Date: 11/12/2024
Case Type: Discipline - Attorney - Suspension
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Attorney Interim Suspended

Olson v. Olson, et al. 2024 ND 206
Docket No.: 20240067
Filing Date: 11/8/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Real Property
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: A district court must have sufficient evidence to support a finding of great prejudice prior to ordering a partition by sale.

The party seeking partition by sale must prove great prejudice with authenticated evidence that a physical partition would result in serious pecuniary injury.

Mbulu v. State 2024 ND 205
Docket No.: 20240036
Filing Date: 11/8/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: An amended criminal judgment is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), (7), and (8).

State v. Callahan 2024 ND 204
Docket No.: 20240145
Filing Date: 11/8/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Misdemeanor
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A criminal judgment entered following a jury verdict is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

State v. Cruz 2024 ND 203
Docket No.: 20240099
Filing Date: 11/8/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Assault
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A criminal judgment entered following a jury verdict is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

Sanderson v. Myrdal, et al. 2024 ND 202
Docket No.: 20240091
Filing Date: 11/8/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Other
Author: Tufte, Jerod E.

Highlight: A district court's grant of summary judgment for defendant is affirmed.

A plaintiff may not challenge the court's jurisdiction over a defendant who admitted personal jurisdiction on the basis of defects in the plaintiff's service of process on the defendant.

Generally, a plaintiff may not obtain a default judgment after being served with defendant's answer.

Under Lindke v. Freed, 601 U.S. 187 (2024), a state official's social-media activity constitutes state action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 only if the official (1) possessed actual authority to speak on the state's behalf, and (2) purported to exercise that authority when he spoke on social media.

A district court has discretion under N.D.C.C. § 28-26-01(2) to determine whether a claim is frivolous and how much to award, but the district court must award costs and attorney's fees if it finds the claim is frivolous.

Fargo Education Association v. Fargo Public School District 2024 ND 201
Docket No.: 20240151
Filing Date: 11/8/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Other
Author: Bahr, Douglas Alan

Highlight: School psychologists not "employed primarily as a classroom teacher" are not "teachers" as defined in N.D.C.C. § 15.1-16-01(5).

Hilton v. North Dakota Edu. Ass'n, 2002 ND 209, 655 N.W.2d 60, is overruled to the extent it holds a licensed school district employee who is not an administrator is a teacher irrespective of the employee's assigned teaching duties.

A special education teacher is not a "teacher" within N.D.C.C. ch. 15.1-16 when the teacher is not a school employee. This Court does not hold whether a school district may provide teaching services through independent contractors.

Interest of J.S. 2024 ND 200
Docket No.: 20240257
Filing Date: 10/24/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Juvenile - Termination of Parental Rights
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A juvenile court order terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4).

Interest of N.S. 2024 ND 200
Docket No.: 20240258
Filing Date: 10/24/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Juvenile - Termination of Parental Rights
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A juvenile court order terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4).

Interest of B.S. 2024 ND 200
Docket No.: 20240259
Filing Date: 10/24/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Juvenile - Termination of Parental Rights
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A juvenile court order terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4).

Malloy, et al. v. Behrens 2024 ND 199
Docket No.: 20240071
Filing Date: 10/24/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Contracts
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: Under N.D.C.C. § 28-21-06(1), when a sheriff receives an execution, the sheriff must satisfy the judgment out of the personal property of the judgment debtor, and if sufficient personal property cannot be found, out of the real property belonging to the debtor.

Applying a statute retroactively results in the attachment of new legal consequences to past matters. Applying a statute prospectively results in the attachment of legal consequences to matters occurring after its effective date. The court must ask whether the new provision attaches new legal consequences to events completed before its enactment.

A debtor is allowed to claim as exempt up to $150,000 of equity in the homestead under N.D.C.C. ch. 47-18. This is accomplished by requiring bids to be more than $150,000 plus the value of liens and encumbrances. See N.D.C.C. §§ 47-18-01 and 47-18-13.

Superior liens are not extinguished by an execution sale. A purchaser of land subject to a mortgage is presumed to have deducted the amount of the senior liens from the amount he bids for the land. A purchaser taking subject to a prior lien is not entitled to an offset for the lien amount.

Kirchmeier v. Monson, et al. 2024 ND 198
Docket No.: 20240075
Filing Date: 10/24/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Real Property
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: Rule 25 of the North Dakota Rules of Civil Procedure governs substitution when a party dies during district court proceedings. Rule 25 provides a number of requirements that must occur before substitution of a party can be ordered and a case continued.

A conservator's authority terminates when the protected person dies.

State v. White Bird 2024 ND 197
Docket No.: 20240132
Filing Date: 10/24/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Sexual Offense
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A criminal judgment is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (7).

Edison v. Edison 2024 ND 196
Docket No.: 20240119
Filing Date: 10/24/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Divorce
Author: Tufte, Jerod E.

Highlight: An amended divorce judgment is affirmed.

Adverse rulings alone are not evidence of judicial bias or partiality.

A district court misapplies N.D. Admin. Code § 75-02-04.1-05 when it fails to make a finding on whether two self-employment activities are related.

The plain language of N.D. Admin. Code § 75-02-04.1-05(6) and (7) does not preclude using a loss to reduce income that is related to the self-employment activity that produced the loss. On the other hand, if two self-employment activities are unrelated, then under N.D. Admin. Code § 75-02-04.1-05(6), a loss resulting from the unrelated self-employment activity could be applied to reduce income from the other self-employment activity only if the monthly gross income, reduced by one-twelfth of the self-employment loss, equals or exceeds the greatest of subsections (a), (b) or (c). If the district court erred in its application of the child support guidelines, then we must examine whether the error was harmless. An error is harmless if it does not affect the outcome of the case or a party's substantial rights. See N.D.R.Civ.P. 61.

Tracy v. Tracy 2024 ND 195
Docket No.: 20240092
Filing Date: 10/24/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Other
Author: Tufte, Jerod E.

Highlight: A domestic violence protection order is affirmed.

A district court's finding of domestic violence is a finding of fact that will not be overturned unless it is clearly erroneous. This Court gives great deference to a factfinder's opportunity to observe the witnesses and determine credibility. We will not reverse simply because we may have viewed the evidence differently.

Interest of D.K.A. 2024 ND 194
Docket No.: 20240248
Filing Date: 10/24/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Mental Health
Author: McEvers, Lisa K. Fair

Highlight: An appeal is moot when a determination is sought which, when rendered, cannot have any practical legal effect upon a then-existing controversy. An appeal is not moot if the district court's decision continues to have collateral consequences for the appealing party. If an individual is already subject to firearms restrictions, the court's finding that federal firearms restrictions apply is not a lasting collateral consequence of the order being challenged on appeal.

Santora v. Santora, et al. 2024 ND 193
Docket No.: 20240014
Filing Date: 10/24/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: An order denying a motion to vacate judgment is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), (4), (7), and (8).

Interest of A.J.E. 2024 ND 192
Docket No.: 20240245
Filing Date: 10/24/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Juvenile - Termination of Parental Rights
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A juvenile court judgment terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).