Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
2071 - 2080 of 12274 results
|
Botteicher, et al. v. Becker, et al.
2018 ND 111
Highlight: Res judicata prevents the litigation of claims that were raised, or could have been raised, in a prior action between the same parties or their privies and were resolved by a final judgment in a court of competent jurisdiction. |
|
Kettle Butte Trucking, LLC v. Kelly, et al.
2018 ND 110
Highlight: When a contempt order is appealed, challenges to the underlying order will not be considered unless the underlying order is also appealed. |
|
Wheeler v. Burgum
2018 ND 109 Highlight: Because the Governor does not directly supervise or train the officials and staff of the North Dakota State Penitentiary, he cannot be held liable in his official capacity under 42 U.S.C. section 1983 for a failure of such action. |
|
Krueger v. N.D. Dep't of Transportation
2018 ND 108
Highlight: A county deputy in fresh pursuit may enter another county to make an arrest if obtaining the aid of officers having jurisdiction would cause a delay permitting escape. |
|
Interest of F.M.G. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2018 ND 107 Highlight: A district court's order for continuing treatment at the North Dakota State Hospital for a period not to exceed one year is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
|
Interest of R.C. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2018 ND 106 Highlight: An appeal from a juvenile court order terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
|
Interest of A.H. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2018 ND 105 Highlight: An appeal from a juvenile court order terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
|
State v. Parks
2018 ND 104 Highlight: An amended criminal judgment for possession of a controlled substance and drug paraphernalia is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7). |
|
Interest of K.S.D. (CONFIDENTIAL) (consolidated with 20170273)
2018 ND 103 Highlight: A juvenile court's decision to terminate parental rights in an ICWA case must be supported by evidence beyond a reasonable doubt, including qualified expert testimony, on whether the continued custody of the child by the parent or Indian custodian is likely to result in serious emotional or physical damage to the child. |
|
Disciplinary Board v. Popper
2018 ND 102 Highlight: Lawyer reprimanded. |