Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
2071 - 2080 of 12446 results
State v. Dowdy
2019 ND 50
Highlight: An arresting officer’s inclusion of additional information in the implied consent advisory must not materially mislead or coerce a defendant. |
Varty v. Varty
2019 ND 49
Highlight: Agreements between divorcing parties are encouraged, and stipulated spousal support awards should be changed only with great reluctance. |
Smith v. Erickson
2019 ND 48 |
Gonzalez v. State
2019 ND 47
Highlight: When an applicant for post-conviction relief alleges newly discovered evidence, a district court errs in sua sponte summarily denying the application, after the State has responded to the application, without providing the applicant notice and the opportunity to submit an answer with supporting materials to show the existence of a genuine issue of material fact. |
Kuntz v. State
2019 ND 46
Highlight: A district court’s decision granting judgment on the pleadings under N.D.R.Civ.P. 12(c) is reviewed de novo. |
Heidt v. Heidt
2019 ND 45
Highlight: District court erred in finding mother had not made a prima facie case for modification of primary residential responsibility. |
State v. Abuhamda
2019 ND 44
Highlight: The right to appeal in this state is purely statutory, and without statutory authorization to hear an appeal this Court lacks jurisdiction. |
State v. Vetter
2019 ND 43
Highlight: The statutory implied consent advisory must be read after a person is placed under arrest and before a chemical test may be administered to determine alcohol concentration. |
Estate of Krueger
2019 ND 42 Highlight: For purposes of Medicaid recovery from a surviving spouse’s estate, the Department’s recovery from a deceased recipient’s joint tenancy property is limited to the deceased recipient’s fractional interest in the property. |
Schindler, et al. v. Wageman, et al.
2019 ND 41
Highlight: Party was required to provide clear and convincing evidence that warranty deeds did not correctly state the parties’ intent. |