Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
2101 - 2200 of 12359 results
Schoon v. N.D. Dep't of Transportation
2018 ND 210
Highlight: If a law enforcement officer fails to provide a driver the complete statutory implied consent advisory after the defendant’s arrest and before the driver’s submission to the chemical test, the result is inadmissible in any criminal or administrative proceeding. |
State v. Hussein
2018 ND 209
Highlight: A criminal judgment for simple assault on a peace officer is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (7). State v. Hannah, 2016 ND 11, ¶ 9, 873 N.W.2d 668. |
State v. Kibble
2018 ND 208 Highlight: Criminal judgment against defendant following a jury verdict of guilty of one count of aggravated assault is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
Interest of I.N. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2018 ND 207
Highlight: An appeal from a juvenile court order terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Greer v. Global Industries, et al.
2018 ND 206 |
Barna, Guzy & Steffen, Ltd. v. Johnson, et al.
2018 ND 205
Highlight: Conclusory allegations in a brief, without citation to any evidence in the record to support the contentions, are insufficient to raise a genuine issue of material fact to defeat summary judgment or to show the district court abused its discretion in denying a motion for relief from judgment. |
Tornabeni v. Creech, et al.
2018 ND 204 |
State v. Finneman
2018 ND 203
Highlight: The procedure for transitioning from a charged greater offense to a lesser included offense requires an acquittal for the greater offense before consideration of the lesser included offense. |
Gustafson v. Poitra, et al.
2018 ND 202
Highlight: An express determination on subject matter jurisdiction in a prior action can be given res judicata effect. |
Interest of D.D. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2018 ND 201 |
Interest of J.B. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2018 ND 200 |
Knudson v. Knudson
2018 ND 199
Highlight: In a divorce action, the district court must consider the needs of the spouse requesting spousal support and the ability of the other spouse to pay. |
State v. Pickens
2018 ND 198 |
State v. Simon (consol. w/ 20170404)
2018 ND 197 |
State v. Corona
2018 ND 196 |
State v. Rose
2018 ND 195 |
State v. Brickle-Hicks
2018 ND 194 Highlight: A district court’s decision to deny a defendant’s motion to suppress evidence will not be reversed on appeal if there is sufficient competent evidence capable of supporting the court’s findings and if its decision is not contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence. |
Interest of E.P. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2018 ND 193 Highlight: An appeal from a juvenile court order terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Riemers v. Jaeger
2018 ND 192
Highlight: A writ of mandamus may be issued to compel performance of an act which the law specifically enjoins as a duty resulting from an office. |
Interest of M.S.H. (CONFIDENTIAL)(consolidated w/20180173 & 20180174)
2018 ND 191 Highlight: An appeal from a juvenile court order terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Interest of A.T. (Confidential)
2018 ND 190 Highlight: A juvenile court order terminating a mother's parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
N.D. Legislative Assembly, et al. v. Burgum
2018 ND 189
Highlight: The Governor cannot withdraw a veto or otherwise concede it was ineffective. |
Disciplinary Board v. Turcotte
2018 ND 188 Highlight: Lawyer Suspension ordered. |
Disciplinary Board v. Bruhn
2018 ND 187 Highlight: Lawyer Suspension ordered. |
Disciplinary Board v. Bruhn
2018 ND 186 Highlight: Lawyer Suspension ordered. |
State v. Biwer
2018 ND 185
Highlight: Conclusory or bare information is not sufficient for probable cause to obtain a search warrant. |
Kovalevich v. State
2018 ND 184 Highlight: Under N.D.C.C. § 29-32.1-01(3)(a)(1), a court may consider an application for post-conviction relief on the basis of newly discovered evidence outside of the general two-year statute of limitations if the petitioner meets the four-pronged test set forth in Greywind v. State, 2004 ND 213, 18, 689 N.W.2d 390. |
Johnston Land Company, LLC v. Sorenson, et al.
2018 ND 183
Highlight: A justiciable controversy subject to appellate jurisdiction exists when a district court order does not fully dispose of the petitioner's claims. |
Kalmio v. State
2018 ND 182
Highlight: A district court has discretion to allow amendments to pleadings. |
Interest of Voisine
2018 ND 181
Highlight: When an individual petitions for discharge from commitment as a sexually dangerous individual, the State must prove the individual remains a sexually dangerous individual by clear and convincing evidence. |
Gerrity Bakken, LLC v. Oasis Petroleum North America LLC, et al.
2018 ND 180
Highlight: Deeds must be construed as a whole to give effect to each provision, if reasonably possible. |
Ramirez v. Walmart
2018 ND 179
Highlight: Although an order dismissing a complaint without prejudice is generally not appealable, when a statute of limitations has run, a dismissal without prejudice is appealable because it forecloses litigation in the plaintiff's chosen forum. |
Interest of B.H. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2018 ND 178
Highlight: The findings in an oral order may control if they are not inconsistent with the written order. |
Bickler, et al. v. Happy House Movers, L.L.P.
2018 ND 177
Highlight: This Court does not consider questions that were not presented to the district court and are raised for the first time on appeal. |
Interest of G.L. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2018 ND 176
Highlight: After finding a parent has removed the impediments causing a child's initial deprivation leading to a guardianship, the juvenile court must find exceptional circumstances before it may analyze the child's best interests in continuing the guardianship. |
State v. Grant
2018 ND 175 Highlight: Obvious error should be noticed on appeal only in exceptional circumstances and when there was a clear deviation from an applicable legal rule under current law. |
Haider v. Moen
2018 ND 174
Highlight: After requesting the jury to make factual findings relating to treble damages, the district court abuses its discretion by failing to instruct the jury on the statutory treble damages. |
State v. Hunter
2018 ND 173
Highlight: Whether a defendant voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently waived his Miranda rights depends on the totality of the circumstances. |
State v. Ngale
2018 ND 172 Highlight: A reserve deputy, who provides services on a non-salaried basis and has full arrest authority, is not required to be licensed to perform peace officer law enforcement duties. |
State v. Blue (consolidated w/20170388)
2018 ND 171
Highlight: Article I, Section 25(1)(n), N.D. Const., and N.D.C.C. 12.1-32-08(1)(b) are not in conflict, and the court must attempt to harmonize a statute and a constitutional provision when possible. |
State, et al. v. Peltier
2018 ND 170 Highlight: A state court has subject matter jurisdiction to decide an Indian father's child support obligation if the action does not infringe on the right of Indian tribes to govern themselves. |
State v. Jorgenson
2018 ND 169
Highlight: Orders approving pretrial diversion and orders of restitution are not appealable under N.D.C.C. § 29-28-06. |
City of Bismarck v. Schaffner
2018 ND 168 Highlight: Entry of a not guilty plea in a criminal bench trial does not preserve the issue of whether city and state laws conflict. |
State v. Vanberkom
2018 ND 167 Highlight: Double jeopardy does not attach when a defendant is assessed an administrative penalty for violation of N.D.C.C. § 39-09-01.1 ("Care required in operating vehicle") and prosecuted for reckless driving under N.D.C.C. § 39-08-03. |
State v. Beltran
2018 ND 166
Highlight: A district court does not err by instructing a jury on the crime of refusal to submit to a chemical test when there is evidence presented indicating the defendant refused to submit to a breath test. |
Interest of J.J.T. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2018 ND 165 Highlight: A parent's delay and obstruction of the legal process may constitute the functional equivalent of a voluntary, knowing, and intelligent waiver of the right to counsel in a proceeding to terminate parental rights. |
Siana Oil & Gas Co., LLC v. Dublin Co., et al. (consolidated w/20180010)
2018 ND 164
Highlight: A county's tax deed gives it title or color of title to the whole estate in the land including the royalty interests. |
Odom v. State
2018 ND 163 Highlight: Order denying petitioner's application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
State v. Everett, Jr.
2018 ND 162 Highlight: Criminal judgment for gross sexual imposition, and order denying motion for a new trial summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (4). |
Butts v. State
2018 ND 161 Highlight: Order denying application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Interest of N.F.F. (CONFIDENTIAL) (consolidated w/20180220 & 20180221)
2018 ND 160 Highlight: An appeal from a juvenile court order terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Adoption of B.A.T. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2018 ND 159 Highlight: A juvenile court order terminating a father's parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
S&B Dickinson Apartments I, LLC, et al. v. Stark County Board of Commissioners
2018 ND 158
Highlight: For a court to have subject matter jurisdiction over an appeal, the appealing party must meet the statutory requirements for perfecting the appeal. |
State v. Yost (consolidated w/20170359 & 20170360)
2018 ND 157
Highlight: A district court does not abuse its discretion in denying a motion to withdraw guilty pleas where the defendant has not shown manifest injustice or upon finding the State would be substantially prejudiced by withdrawal. |
Agri Industries v. Franson, et al. (Consolidated w/20170412)
2018 ND 156
Highlight: A district court does not err by granting summary judgment to a mineral developer for damage to a water well when the property owner did not comply with N.D.C.C. § 38-11.1-06, which requires a certified water quality test before proceeding with an action. |
State v. Cullett
2018 ND 155 Highlight: A district court judgment entered after a jury found Cullett guilty of terrorizing is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
Chase v. State
2018 ND 154 Highlight: A district court's order denying an application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
Tillich, et al. v. Bruce, et al.
2018 ND 153 Highlight: An award of costs and attorney fees is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4). |
Interest of A.C. (CONFIDENTIAL)(CONSOLIDATED W/20180201)
2018 ND 152 Highlight: A juvenile court order terminating a father's parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Interest of Z.F.T. (CONFIDENTIAL)(consolidated w/ 20180182-20180185)
2018 ND 151 Highlight: A juvenile court order terminating a mother's and a father's parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Oien v. State
2018 ND 150 Highlight: Judgment denying defendant's application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7). |
Matthews v. State
2018 ND 149 Highlight: Judgment summarily dismissing application for post-conviction relief is affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6) and (7). |
RAD Development-Main Street, LLC v. Leunguen-Koundjo, et al.
2018 ND 148 Highlight: Judgment of eviction is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
State v. Kisi
2018 ND 147 Highlight: Criminal judgments for gross sexual imposition and accomplice to attempted murder are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) |
Vacancy in Judgeship No. 2, South Central Judicial District
2018 ND 145 Highlight: Judgeship retained at Bismarck. |
Poochigian, et al. v. City of Grand Forks
2018 ND 144 Highlight: A post-election claim challenging pre-election irregularities is rendered moot by the completion of the election. |
Zuraff v. Reiger, et al.
2018 ND 143
Highlight: A district court does not clearly err by concluding the domestic violence presumption under N.D.C.C. § 14-09-06.2(1)(j) did not apply because there was insufficient evidence of domestic violence involving serious bodily injury. |
Thompson, et al. v. Johnson
2018 ND 142
Highlight: A correct finding of an obligor's net income is essential to determine the proper amount of child support. |
Morel v. State
2018 ND 141
Highlight: A new rule applies retroactively to final convictions in very limited circumstances. Substantive rules are generally applied retroactively because they carry a significant risk that a defendant stands convicted of an act the law does not make criminal or faces punishment the law cannot impose on him. |
Pettinger v. Carroll
2018 ND 140
Highlight: On review of a summary judgment, if reasonable persons could reach only one conclusion from the facts, issues of fact may become issues of law. |
Interest of B.A.K. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2018 ND 139 Highlight: A district court clearly errs by finding an individual is a person requiring treatment under N.D.C.C. § 25-03.1-02 when the evidence does not support the conclusion the individual's mental health deterioration would predictably result in dangerousness to the individual, others, or property. |
Rath v. Rath
2018 ND 138
Highlight: The district court has broad discretion over the presentation of evidence and conduct of a trial, in addition to whether to grant a continuance. |
Rourke v. State
2018 ND 137
Highlight: In order to prevail on a post-conviction relief application based on ineffective assistance of counsel, the petitioner must (1) "show that counsel's representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness" and (2) "show that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different." |
Flaten v. Couture, et al.
2018 ND 136
Highlight: If the language of a contract is unambiguous, extrinsic evidence is inadmissible to alter, vary, explain, or change the document. |
State v. Broom
2018 ND 135
Highlight: A law enforcement officer may conduct a frisk, or a pat-down search, of a person only when the officer possesses an articulable suspicion that an individual is armed and dangerous. |
Jensen v. State
2018 ND 134 Highlight: The right to a preliminary hearing is waived when a defendant fails to raise the issue at an arraignment or change of plea hearing and proceeds to plead guilty. |
State v. Erickson
2018 ND 133 Highlight: If an officer's reasonable suspicion is dispelled after lawfully stopping an individual, the officer may make contact with the individual only to briefly explain the reason for the stop. |
State v. Taylor
2018 ND 132
Highlight: The requirements for a valid traffic stop are not an essential element of the crime of refusing a chemical test for intoxication. |
Pierce, et al. v. Anderson, et al.
2018 ND 131
Highlight: This Court cautiously exercises its supervisory jurisdiction to prevent injustice in extraordinary cases where there is no adequate alternative remedy. |
Dickson v. Dickson
2018 ND 130
Highlight: An original determination to award primary residential responsibility is necessary when the parents have joint or equal residential responsibility or when the earlier residential responsibility determination is based on the parties' stipulation. |
Beeter v. State
2018 ND 129 Highlight: Summary dismissal of application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
State v. Contreras-Castillo
2018 ND 128 Highlight: An appeal from a district court order denying a motion to withdraw a guilty plea is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (7). |
Interest of Hoff
2018 ND 127 Highlight: A district court order denying discharge from civil commitment as a sexually dangerous individual is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Interest of K.B. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2018 ND 126 Highlight: An appeal from a juvenile court order terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4). |
State v. Ashford
2018 ND 125 Highlight: Criminal judgment for delivery of a controlled substance is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
Bjerk, et al. v. Anderson
2018 ND 124 Highlight: Absent a heightened degree of foreseeability, a homeowner does not have a duty of care under a premises liability theory to protect a guest in the home from the guest's own voluntary consumption of illegal drugs. |
N.D. Dep't of Transportation v. Rosie Glow, LLC
2018 ND 123
Highlight: A district court abuses its discretion in awarding attorney fees without adequate explanation for drastically reducing the award. |
Ferguson v. Ferguson
2018 ND 122 |
Key Energy Services, LLC v. Ewing Construction Co., Inc., et. al.
2018 ND 121
Highlight: A district court in its discretion may allow amendment of a proof of service at any time. |
Molbert v. Kornkven, et al.
2018 ND 120
Highlight: Actions involving fraud are not commonly suited for summary judgment; however, if a party fails to support his or her opposition to summary judgment with sufficient facts to show there is a genuine issue for trial, then, even in these cases, summary judgment may be appropriate. |
Alerus Financial, N.A. v. Erwin
2018 ND 119
Highlight: When a party moves to amend a pleading in response to a motion for summary judgment, the proposed amendment must be theoretically viable and supported by substantial evidence. |
Estate of Nelson
2018 ND 118
Highlight: A life tenant may convey or lease his or her interest, but may not disregard the rights of those who take when the life estate ends. |
Matter of Hogen Trust B
2018 ND 117
Highlight: In the absence of trust language specifying a termination date for a trust, termination occurs when the object or purpose of the trust is accomplished. |
IRET Properties v. Lee, et al.
2018 ND 116
Highlight: The purpose of the summary eviction statute is to provide an inexpensive, expeditious, and simple means to determine possession of property. The right to the possession of disputed real estate is the only fact that can be rightfully litigated in a summary eviction action unless damages or rent is claimed. |
Hoff v. Hoff
2018 ND 115
Highlight: A district court need not make separate findings for each best interests factor but, as with custody, the court's findings must contain sufficient specificity to show the factual basis for the decision. |
Everett v. State
2018 ND 114 Highlight: Orders denying leave to file additional motions or papers are not appealable. |
N.D. Dep't of Transportation v. Schmitz
2018 ND 113
Highlight: A trial court may award reasonable attorney fees, expert witness fees, or litigation costs to the prevailing party in an eminent domain action. |
State v. $3260.00 United States Currency, et al.
2018 ND 112
Highlight: The application of N.D.R.Civ.P. 56, summary judgment, may be appropriate in a forfeiture action. |
Botteicher, et al. v. Becker, et al.
2018 ND 111
Highlight: Res judicata prevents the litigation of claims that were raised, or could have been raised, in a prior action between the same parties or their privies and were resolved by a final judgment in a court of competent jurisdiction. |
Kettle Butte Trucking, LLC v. Kelly, et al.
2018 ND 110
Highlight: When a contempt order is appealed, challenges to the underlying order will not be considered unless the underlying order is also appealed. |