Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
2201 - 2300 of 12418 results
City of Bismarck v. Schaffner
2018 ND 168 Highlight: Entry of a not guilty plea in a criminal bench trial does not preserve the issue of whether city and state laws conflict. |
State v. Vanberkom
2018 ND 167 Highlight: Double jeopardy does not attach when a defendant is assessed an administrative penalty for violation of N.D.C.C. § 39-09-01.1 ("Care required in operating vehicle") and prosecuted for reckless driving under N.D.C.C. § 39-08-03. |
State v. Beltran
2018 ND 166
Highlight: A district court does not err by instructing a jury on the crime of refusal to submit to a chemical test when there is evidence presented indicating the defendant refused to submit to a breath test. |
Interest of J.J.T. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2018 ND 165 Highlight: A parent's delay and obstruction of the legal process may constitute the functional equivalent of a voluntary, knowing, and intelligent waiver of the right to counsel in a proceeding to terminate parental rights. |
Siana Oil & Gas Co., LLC v. Dublin Co., et al. (consolidated w/20180010)
2018 ND 164
Highlight: A county's tax deed gives it title or color of title to the whole estate in the land including the royalty interests. |
Odom v. State
2018 ND 163 Highlight: Order denying petitioner's application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
State v. Everett, Jr.
2018 ND 162 Highlight: Criminal judgment for gross sexual imposition, and order denying motion for a new trial summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (4). |
Butts v. State
2018 ND 161 Highlight: Order denying application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Interest of N.F.F. (CONFIDENTIAL) (consolidated w/20180220 & 20180221)
2018 ND 160 Highlight: An appeal from a juvenile court order terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Adoption of B.A.T. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2018 ND 159 Highlight: A juvenile court order terminating a father's parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
S&B Dickinson Apartments I, LLC, et al. v. Stark County Board of Commissioners
2018 ND 158
Highlight: For a court to have subject matter jurisdiction over an appeal, the appealing party must meet the statutory requirements for perfecting the appeal. |
State v. Yost (consolidated w/20170359 & 20170360)
2018 ND 157
Highlight: A district court does not abuse its discretion in denying a motion to withdraw guilty pleas where the defendant has not shown manifest injustice or upon finding the State would be substantially prejudiced by withdrawal. |
Agri Industries v. Franson, et al. (Consolidated w/20170412)
2018 ND 156
Highlight: A district court does not err by granting summary judgment to a mineral developer for damage to a water well when the property owner did not comply with N.D.C.C. § 38-11.1-06, which requires a certified water quality test before proceeding with an action. |
State v. Cullett
2018 ND 155 Highlight: A district court judgment entered after a jury found Cullett guilty of terrorizing is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
Chase v. State
2018 ND 154 Highlight: A district court's order denying an application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
Tillich, et al. v. Bruce, et al.
2018 ND 153 Highlight: An award of costs and attorney fees is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4). |
Interest of A.C. (CONFIDENTIAL)(CONSOLIDATED W/20180201)
2018 ND 152 Highlight: A juvenile court order terminating a father's parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Interest of Z.F.T. (CONFIDENTIAL)(consolidated w/ 20180182-20180185)
2018 ND 151 Highlight: A juvenile court order terminating a mother's and a father's parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Oien v. State
2018 ND 150 Highlight: Judgment denying defendant's application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7). |
Matthews v. State
2018 ND 149 Highlight: Judgment summarily dismissing application for post-conviction relief is affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6) and (7). |
RAD Development-Main Street, LLC v. Leunguen-Koundjo, et al.
2018 ND 148 Highlight: Judgment of eviction is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
State v. Kisi
2018 ND 147 Highlight: Criminal judgments for gross sexual imposition and accomplice to attempted murder are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) |
Vacancy in Judgeship No. 2, South Central Judicial District
2018 ND 145 Highlight: Judgeship retained at Bismarck. |
Poochigian, et al. v. City of Grand Forks
2018 ND 144 Highlight: A post-election claim challenging pre-election irregularities is rendered moot by the completion of the election. |
Zuraff v. Reiger, et al.
2018 ND 143
Highlight: A district court does not clearly err by concluding the domestic violence presumption under N.D.C.C. § 14-09-06.2(1)(j) did not apply because there was insufficient evidence of domestic violence involving serious bodily injury. |
Thompson, et al. v. Johnson
2018 ND 142
Highlight: A correct finding of an obligor's net income is essential to determine the proper amount of child support. |
Morel v. State
2018 ND 141
Highlight: A new rule applies retroactively to final convictions in very limited circumstances. Substantive rules are generally applied retroactively because they carry a significant risk that a defendant stands convicted of an act the law does not make criminal or faces punishment the law cannot impose on him. |
Pettinger v. Carroll
2018 ND 140
Highlight: On review of a summary judgment, if reasonable persons could reach only one conclusion from the facts, issues of fact may become issues of law. |
Interest of B.A.K. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2018 ND 139 Highlight: A district court clearly errs by finding an individual is a person requiring treatment under N.D.C.C. § 25-03.1-02 when the evidence does not support the conclusion the individual's mental health deterioration would predictably result in dangerousness to the individual, others, or property. |
Rath v. Rath
2018 ND 138
Highlight: The district court has broad discretion over the presentation of evidence and conduct of a trial, in addition to whether to grant a continuance. |
Rourke v. State
2018 ND 137
Highlight: In order to prevail on a post-conviction relief application based on ineffective assistance of counsel, the petitioner must (1) "show that counsel's representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness" and (2) "show that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different." |
Flaten v. Couture, et al.
2018 ND 136
Highlight: If the language of a contract is unambiguous, extrinsic evidence is inadmissible to alter, vary, explain, or change the document. |
State v. Broom
2018 ND 135
Highlight: A law enforcement officer may conduct a frisk, or a pat-down search, of a person only when the officer possesses an articulable suspicion that an individual is armed and dangerous. |
Jensen v. State
2018 ND 134 Highlight: The right to a preliminary hearing is waived when a defendant fails to raise the issue at an arraignment or change of plea hearing and proceeds to plead guilty. |
State v. Erickson
2018 ND 133 Highlight: If an officer's reasonable suspicion is dispelled after lawfully stopping an individual, the officer may make contact with the individual only to briefly explain the reason for the stop. |
State v. Taylor
2018 ND 132
Highlight: The requirements for a valid traffic stop are not an essential element of the crime of refusing a chemical test for intoxication. |
Pierce, et al. v. Anderson, et al.
2018 ND 131
Highlight: This Court cautiously exercises its supervisory jurisdiction to prevent injustice in extraordinary cases where there is no adequate alternative remedy. |
Dickson v. Dickson
2018 ND 130
Highlight: An original determination to award primary residential responsibility is necessary when the parents have joint or equal residential responsibility or when the earlier residential responsibility determination is based on the parties' stipulation. |
Beeter v. State
2018 ND 129 Highlight: Summary dismissal of application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
State v. Contreras-Castillo
2018 ND 128 Highlight: An appeal from a district court order denying a motion to withdraw a guilty plea is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (7). |
Interest of Hoff
2018 ND 127 Highlight: A district court order denying discharge from civil commitment as a sexually dangerous individual is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Interest of K.B. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2018 ND 126 Highlight: An appeal from a juvenile court order terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4). |
State v. Ashford
2018 ND 125 Highlight: Criminal judgment for delivery of a controlled substance is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
Bjerk, et al. v. Anderson
2018 ND 124 Highlight: Absent a heightened degree of foreseeability, a homeowner does not have a duty of care under a premises liability theory to protect a guest in the home from the guest's own voluntary consumption of illegal drugs. |
N.D. Dep't of Transportation v. Rosie Glow, LLC
2018 ND 123
Highlight: A district court abuses its discretion in awarding attorney fees without adequate explanation for drastically reducing the award. |
Ferguson v. Ferguson
2018 ND 122 |
Key Energy Services, LLC v. Ewing Construction Co., Inc., et. al.
2018 ND 121
Highlight: A district court in its discretion may allow amendment of a proof of service at any time. |
Molbert v. Kornkven, et al.
2018 ND 120
Highlight: Actions involving fraud are not commonly suited for summary judgment; however, if a party fails to support his or her opposition to summary judgment with sufficient facts to show there is a genuine issue for trial, then, even in these cases, summary judgment may be appropriate. |
Alerus Financial, N.A. v. Erwin
2018 ND 119
Highlight: When a party moves to amend a pleading in response to a motion for summary judgment, the proposed amendment must be theoretically viable and supported by substantial evidence. |
Estate of Nelson
2018 ND 118
Highlight: A life tenant may convey or lease his or her interest, but may not disregard the rights of those who take when the life estate ends. |
Matter of Hogen Trust B
2018 ND 117
Highlight: In the absence of trust language specifying a termination date for a trust, termination occurs when the object or purpose of the trust is accomplished. |
IRET Properties v. Lee, et al.
2018 ND 116
Highlight: The purpose of the summary eviction statute is to provide an inexpensive, expeditious, and simple means to determine possession of property. The right to the possession of disputed real estate is the only fact that can be rightfully litigated in a summary eviction action unless damages or rent is claimed. |
Hoff v. Hoff
2018 ND 115
Highlight: A district court need not make separate findings for each best interests factor but, as with custody, the court's findings must contain sufficient specificity to show the factual basis for the decision. |
Everett v. State
2018 ND 114 Highlight: Orders denying leave to file additional motions or papers are not appealable. |
N.D. Dep't of Transportation v. Schmitz
2018 ND 113
Highlight: A trial court may award reasonable attorney fees, expert witness fees, or litigation costs to the prevailing party in an eminent domain action. |
State v. $3260.00 United States Currency, et al.
2018 ND 112
Highlight: The application of N.D.R.Civ.P. 56, summary judgment, may be appropriate in a forfeiture action. |
Botteicher, et al. v. Becker, et al.
2018 ND 111
Highlight: Res judicata prevents the litigation of claims that were raised, or could have been raised, in a prior action between the same parties or their privies and were resolved by a final judgment in a court of competent jurisdiction. |
Kettle Butte Trucking, LLC v. Kelly, et al.
2018 ND 110
Highlight: When a contempt order is appealed, challenges to the underlying order will not be considered unless the underlying order is also appealed. |
Wheeler v. Burgum
2018 ND 109 Highlight: Because the Governor does not directly supervise or train the officials and staff of the North Dakota State Penitentiary, he cannot be held liable in his official capacity under 42 U.S.C. section 1983 for a failure of such action. |
Krueger v. N.D. Dep't of Transportation
2018 ND 108
Highlight: A county deputy in fresh pursuit may enter another county to make an arrest if obtaining the aid of officers having jurisdiction would cause a delay permitting escape. |
Interest of F.M.G. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2018 ND 107 Highlight: A district court's order for continuing treatment at the North Dakota State Hospital for a period not to exceed one year is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Interest of R.C. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2018 ND 106 Highlight: An appeal from a juvenile court order terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Interest of A.H. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2018 ND 105 Highlight: An appeal from a juvenile court order terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
State v. Parks
2018 ND 104 Highlight: An amended criminal judgment for possession of a controlled substance and drug paraphernalia is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7). |
Disciplinary Board v. Popper
2018 ND 102 Highlight: Lawyer reprimanded. |
CHS Inc. v. Riemers
2018 ND 101
Highlight: Attorney's fees and costs may be awarded under N.D.C.C. 28-26-01(2) whether or not they are also available under N.D.R.Civ.P. 11. |
State v. Cook
2018 ND 100
Highlight: To satisfy the requirement of authenticating or identifying an item of evidence, the proponent must produce evidence sufficient to support a finding that the item is what the proponent claims it is. N.D.R.Ev. 901(a). |
Nelson, et al. v. Mattson, et al. (consolidated w/20170287)
2018 ND 99
Highlight: Joint ventures can own property similarly to partnerships. |
Rath v. Rath
2018 ND 98
Highlight: A claim for relief is frivolous only if there is such a complete absence of actual facts or law a reasonable person could not have expected a court would render a judgment in that person's favor. |
Rocky Mountain Steel Foundations, Inc. v. Brockett Company, LLC, et al.
2018 ND 96
Highlight: An owner's full payment of the general contractor after receipt of notice of a subcontractor's oil and gas construction lien does not invalidate the subcontractor's lien. |
State v. Gunn
2018 ND 95
Highlight: The criminal attempt statute does not require that the underlying offense be committed. |
Olson v. N.D. Dep't of Transportation
2018 ND 94
Highlight: The revocation of driving privileges for refusal to submit to chemical testing requires a valid arrest. |
State v. Wilder
2018 ND 93
Highlight: A comment on the defendant's post-arrest silence is an improper comment on the right to remain silent in violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution. |
State v. Rutherford
2018 ND 91 Highlight: A district court's criminal judgment ordering restitution is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4). |
Interest of R.F. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2018 ND 90 Highlight: A district court's order for continued treatment at the North Dakota State Hospital for a period not to exceed one year is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Interest of S.B. (Consolidated w/20180057)(CONFIDENTIAL)
2018 ND 89 Highlight: An appeal from a juvenile court order terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Thorstad v. State
2018 ND 88 Highlight: Summary dismissal of an application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6) and (7). |
State v. Ali
2018 ND 87 Highlight: Warrantless, limited entry by a police officer into an open garage does not violate a defendant's federal or state constitutional rights under the hot pursuit exception to the warrant requirement. |
Brekhus v. N.D. Dep't of Transportation
2018 ND 86 Highlight: Warrantless, limited entry by a police officer into an open garage does not violate a defendant's federal or state constitutional rights under the hot pursuit exception to the warrant requirement. |
Grasser v. Grasser
2018 ND 85
Highlight: A motion for recusal and a demand for a change of judge are two separate motions. Unlike a demand under N.D.C.C. 29-15-21, a district court judge is not immediately divested of authority upon the filing of a motion to recuse. While a judge has a duty to recuse when required by the Code of Judicial Conduct, a judge also has an equally strong duty not to recuse when the facts do not require recusal. |
City of Bismarck v. Brekhus (consolidated w/20170166 & 20170167)
2018 ND 84 Highlight: A police officer's warrantless, limited entry into a defendant's open garage while in "hot pursuit" does not violate the defendant's rights under either the federal or state constitutions. |
J.B., et al. v. R.B.
2018 ND 83 |
Solwey v. Solwey
2018 ND 82
Highlight: The effective date for a modification of child support depends upon the facts of each case. The modification generally should be made effective from the date of the motion to modify, absent good reason to set some other date. |
Carlson v. State
2018 ND 81
Highlight: An application for post-conviction relief must be filed within two years of the date the conviction becomes final under N.D.C.C. 29-32.1-01(2). |
Arnegard, et al. v. Arnegard Township
2018 ND 80
Highlight: Zoning ordinances and amendments are valid if a township follows the statutory procedures. A conditional use permit does not by itself create a contract between a township and a landowner. |
Berg v. Berg
2018 ND 79 Highlight: A district court does not clearly err in dividing property and awarding spousal support when it considers the Ruff-Fischer factors and adequately explains its findings regarding property division and spousal support. |
State v. Terrill
2018 ND 78
Highlight: Constructive possession of drug paraphernalia is sufficient probable cause to arrest. Constructive possession can be inferred from the totality of the circumstances including (1) an accused's presence in the place where a controlled substance is found; (2) his proximity to the place where it is found; and (3) the fact the controlled substance was found in plain view. |
Chatman v. State
2018 ND 77
Highlight: An application for post-conviction relief based on newly discovered evidence must be supported by competent, admissible evidence. |
Interest of T.S.C. (CONFIDENTIAL)(Consolidated w/20180053 & 20180054)
2018 ND 76 Highlight: An untimely notice of appeal leaves the Supreme Court without jurisdiction to consider the appeal. |
State v. Sauter
2018 ND 75 Highlight: A warrantless blood-alcohol test is unreasonable unless it falls within a recognized exception to the warrant requirement. A warrantless blood-alcohol test may be justified under the exigent circumstances exception to the warrant requirement. |
State v. Redtomahawk
2018 ND 74 Highlight: Criminal judgment for robbery is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
State v. Mbulu
2018 ND 73 Highlight: Criminal convictions for conspiracy to commit gross sexual imposition, accomplice to gross sexual imposition, conspiracy to commit murder and attempted murder summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (4). |
Petition of Bolinske
2018 ND 72 Highlight: An attorney subject to disciplinary proceedings is entitled to procedural due process, including fair notice of the nature of the charges and an opportunity to be heard. |
Larimore Public School District No. 44, et al. v. Aamodt, et al.
2018 ND 71 Highlight: The statutory cap on tort damages recoverable from a political subdivision does not violate the open court, jury trial, equal protection, or special law provisions of the state constitution. |
Melendez v. Horning III, et al.
2018 ND 70
Highlight: Nonsignatories to arbitration agreement may compel signatories to the agreement to arbitrate under some circumstances. |
Parshall v. State
2018 ND 69
Highlight: Plea agreements are interpreted according to general contract principles. |
Owego Township v. Pfingsten
2018 ND 68 Highlight: A township's determination or award of damages must be appealed within thirty days of filing under N.D.C.C. §§ 24-07-22 and 28-34-01. |
Estate of Albrecht
2018 ND 67
Highlight: An estate's motion for summary judgment satisfies the statutory requirement that a proceeding on a claim be commenced within sixty days after the personal representative mailed the notice of disallowance. |
Yahnke v. State
2018 ND 66 Highlight: A district court's order denying Yahnke's post-conviction relief application is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7). |
Carroll v. Carroll (cross-reference w/20160190)
2018 ND 65 Highlight: An amended divorce judgment entered on remand and an order reducing child support obligation are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |