Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
2631 - 2640 of 12359 results
Larson v. Midland Hospital Supply, Inc., et al.
2016 ND 214
Highlight: A statute of limitations begins to run when the underlying cause of action accrues, and a claim's accrual may be postponed until the plaintiff knew, or with the exercise of reasonable diligence should have known, of the wrongful act and its resulting injury. |
Frith, et al. v. The Park District of the City of Fargo, et al.
2016 ND 213 Highlight: The statute of limitations for tort actions against a political subdivision is three years. |
Patterson v. State
2016 ND 212 Highlight: A district court has the discretion under N.D.C.C. 19-03.1-23.2 to suspend or defer a defendant's sentence with or without considering a defendant's equivalent convictions. |
Dakota Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. City of Bismarck
2016 ND 210
Highlight: A city's denial of a special use permit must be affirmed unless it acted arbitrarily, capriciously, or unreasonably. |
State v. Patrick
2016 ND 209 Highlight: A traffic stop made under a presumptively valid statute generally provides an officer with reasonable articulable suspicion. |
State v. Russell
2016 ND 208 Highlight: Due process requires a disclosure of material evidence. Evidence is material if a reasonable probability exists that, had the evidence been disclosed to the defense, the result of the proceeding would have been different. |
Shermer v. State
2016 ND 207 Highlight: District court order summarily dismissing application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6). |
Interest of S.J. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2016 ND 206 Highlight: A juvenile court order terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Kardor v. State
2016 ND 205 Highlight: Order denying post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Hageness v. Slaubaugh, et al.
2016 ND 204 Highlight: Judgment dividing ownership of real property is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1). |