Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
2631 - 2640 of 12137 results
|
Interest of G.L.D. (CONFIDENTIAL)(cross-reference w/20100230,20120175,&20140034)
2016 ND 25 Highlight: A district court order denying petition for discharge from civil commitment as a sexually dangerous individual is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
|
Interest of N.C. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2016 ND 24 Highlight: A juvenile court order terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
|
Gomez v. State
2016 ND 23 Highlight: Order dismissing application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
|
Benson v. State (cross-reference w/20130179)
2016 ND 22 Highlight: Order dismissing application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6). |
|
Vacancy in Judgeship No. 7, SEJD (see 20160011)
2016 ND 21 Highlight: Judgeships retained at Jamestown and Valley City. |
|
PHI Financial Services, Inc. v. Johnston Law Office, P.C., et al.
2016 ND 20
Highlight: A party that acts as a "mere conduit" for a transfer of funds is not a "first transferee" for purposes of liability under the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act. |
|
Titan Machinery, Inc. v. Patterson Enterprises, Inc., et al.
2016 ND 19
Highlight: A proponent may introduce into evidence a summary to prove the content of voluminous writings that cannot be conveniently examined in court. |
|
Estate of Glasoe, et al. v. Williams County, ND, et al.
2016 ND 18
Highlight: There must be strict compliance with mandatory jurisdictional requirements of the tax lien foreclosure statutes, and those statutes will be strictly construed in favor of the owners of the property. |
|
Palmer v. 999 Quebec, Inc., et al.
2016 ND 17
Highlight: Generally, the existence of a duty is a preliminary question of law for the court. When a duty does not exist, there is no negligence. |
|
Ritter v. Ritter
2016 ND 16 Highlight: A parent may establish a prima facie case for modification of residential responsibility following a stipulated divorce when the parent's affidavit evidences a significant change in employment resulting in a predictable work schedule and such modification is in the children's best interests. |