Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
2651 - 2660 of 12446 results
Klein, et al. v. Sletto, et al.
2017 ND 26 Highlight: A contract for the sale of property is invalid unless it is in writing. |
Burk v. State of North Dakota, et al.
2017 ND 25
Highlight: A settlement agreement is a contract and the parties' rights and responsibilities are limited by the terms of the agreement. |
Rathbun v. Rathbun
2017 ND 24 Highlight: A district court errs by failing to correctly apply the child support guidelines when imputing income to an obligor. |
State v. Cox
2017 ND 23 Highlight: Issues that are not raised before the district court will not be addressed on appeal. |
Nusviken, et al. v. Johnston, et al.
2017 ND 22
Highlight: Under an attorney's lien, the attorney is the equitable assignee of money due from the judgment debtor to the judgment creditor. |
Tillich, et al. v. Bruce, et al.
2017 ND 21 Highlight: When a party requests attorney fees under N.D.C.C. § 28-26-01(2), the district court must first determine whether a claim is frivolous. If the court determines the claim is frivolous, the court must award reasonable attorney fees to the prevailing party. |
Beckstrand v. Beckstrand, et al. (consolidated w/20160106)
2017 ND 20
Highlight: Cancellation of a contract for deed by action is an action in equity, and the district court must base its decision on equitable principles. |
Krenz, et al. v. XTO Energy, Inc. (cross-reference w/20110147)
2017 ND 19
Highlight: The unauthorized use of land to develop mineral interests is a trespass. |
J B Construction, Inc. v. Job Service
2017 ND 18
Highlight: The exemption of certain officers from "employment" under the unemployment compensation law is granted to an officer as an individual, not to the officer's position. |
Glass v. Glass
2017 ND 17 Highlight: Before N.D.C.C. § 14-05-24.1 was amended effective August 1, 2015, remarriage created a prima facie case to terminate permanent spousal support unless extraordinary circumstances existed to justify its continuance. The decision as to whether spousal support terminated, and if so, when, lied within the district court's discretion. |