Opinions

Meyer, et al. v. Engebretson, et al. 2015 ND 242
Docket No.: 20150170
Filing Date: 10/13/2015
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Real Property
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Summary judgment deciding ownership of mineral interests is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6) and (7).

Kitzan v. State 2015 ND 241
Docket No.: 20150045
Filing Date: 10/13/2015
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Order denying post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

State v. Berg 2015 ND 240
Docket No.: 20150076
Filing Date: 10/13/2015
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Other
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: District court order for revocation of probation and amended criminal judgment is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (7).

Wedemeyer v. State 2015 ND 239
Docket No.: 20150021
Filing Date: 10/13/2015
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Order dismissing application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

Border Resources, LLC v. Irish Oil & Gas, Inc., et al. 2015 ND 238
Docket No.: 20140264
Filing Date: 9/21/2015
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Contracts
Author: McEvers, Lisa K. Fair

Highlight: A fiduciary duty, including a corresponding duty of loyalty and honesty, arises between an oil company and its landman based on a confidential relationship.
The existence and scope of a fiduciary duty depends on the language of the parties' agreement.
A district court has wide discretion in deciding whether to permit amended pleadings after the time for an amendment has passed.

State v. Montplaisir 2015 ND 237
Docket No.: 20140459
Filing Date: 9/17/2015
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - DUI/DUS/APC
Author: McEvers, Lisa K. Fair

Highlight: An information is sufficient if it sets forth the offense in the words of the statute and is specific enough to provide a defendant with notice of the pending charges to enable the defendant to prepare a defense.
A statute is not unconstitutionally vague if the challenged language, when viewed under a reasonable person standard, gives adequate and fair warning of the prohibited conduct and creates minimum guidelines for those whose duty is to enforce the statute.
A district court's decision at a preliminary hearing that probable cause existed to bind a defendant over for trial is rendered moot once the trial is held, and the defendant may not, on appeal, challenge the decision that probable cause existed.

Klein v. Klein 2015 ND 236
Docket No.: 20140449
Filing Date: 9/17/2015
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: McEvers, Lisa K. Fair

Highlight: Under the child support guidelines, "self-employment" means employment that results in an obligor earning income from any business organization or entity which the obligor is, to a significant extent, able to directly or indirectly control.
The child support guidelines restrict when a loss from self-employment may be applied to reduce income unrelated to self-employment.
When tax returns are not available or are unreliable, the guidelines require the district court to use profit and loss statements that more accurately reflect the obligor's current self-employment income to properly calculate income.

State v. Guttormson 2015 ND 235
Docket No.: 20150035
Filing Date: 9/17/2015
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - DUI/DUS/APC
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: Statements admitted to prove a point other than the truth of the matter asserted are not testimonial hearsay statements.
Insufficient evidence to support a conviction exists only when, after reviewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict and giving the benefit of all inferences reasonably to be drawn in favor of the verdict, no rational fact finder could find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

State v. Chase 2015 ND 234
Docket No.: 20150010
Filing Date: 9/17/2015
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Sexual Offense
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: A trial court does not abuse its discretion by excluding evidence of prior sexual activity between a victim and defendant when the defendant has not provided the required notice of intent to offer such evidence.

Interest of M.R., a Child (CONFIDENTIAL) 2015 ND 233
Docket No.: 20150175
Filing Date: 9/17/2015
Case Type: Appeal - Juvenile - Termination of Parental Rights
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: The juvenile court is not required to second-guess an attorney's statement regarding his client's decision not to appear by telephone at a termination of parental rights trial.
A parent is not denied due process when his parental rights were terminated while he was not present because he was given proper notice, afforded the opportunity to appear telephonically, and represented by counsel.
When a juvenile court sends notice to intervene to the proper tribe and the tribe declines to exercise jurisdiction, the juvenile court has satisfied ICWA's requirements and may proceed with the case.