Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
2831 - 2840 of 12279 results
|
Messer, et al. v. B&B Hot Oil Service, Inc., et al.
2015 ND 202
Highlight: For negligence claims based on defective products, the focus is on whether or not the conduct of the manufacturer or seller falls below the standard of reasonable care. One who has been injured by a product may seek to hold the manufacturer or seller liable on the theory that the design of the product made it dangerous and, apart from whether it was negligent in its design, negligence is inhered in a failure to warn of the danger. |
|
State v. Clark
2015 ND 201 Highlight: A conviction rests upon insufficient evidence only when, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution and giving the prosecution the benefit of all inferences reasonably to be drawn in its favor, no rational fact finder could find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. |
|
Johnson, et al. v. Shield, et al.
2015 ND 200
Highlight: Reservations or exceptions of property interests may appear in any part of a deed, including the warranty clause. |
|
BAHA Petroleum Consulting Corp. v. Job Service
2015 ND 199 Highlight: Whether a worker is an independent contractor or an employee is a mixed question of fact and law, and the employer bears the burden of showing the worker is an independent contractor. |
|
State v. Morel
2015 ND 198 Highlight: Conviction of refusal to submit to a chemical test is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
|
State v. Kordonowy
2015 ND 197
Highlight: The implied consent statute criminalizing refusal to consent to chemical testing is not unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment or N.D. Constitution article I, section 8, and it is not unconstitutionally vague. |
|
State v. Kardor
2015 ND 196
Highlight: A Brady v. Maryland violation is established if a defendant proves: (1) the government possessed evidence favorable to the defendant; (2) the defendant did not possess the evidence and could not have obtained it with reasonable diligence; (3) the prosecution suppressed the evidence; and (4) a reasonable probability exists that the outcome of the proceedings would have been different if the evidence had been disclosed. |
|
Yesel, et al. v. Brandon, et al. (consolidated w/20140187)
2015 ND 195
Highlight: A royalty interest is not abandoned if the mineral interest related to the royalty interest has been used within the last 20 years. |
|
State v. Filkowski
2015 ND 194
Highlight: Evidence establishing the approved methods, devices, or individuals administering analytical tests requires foundational support indicating approval from the director of the state crime laboratory or the director's designee. |
|
City of Dickinson v. Etienne
2015 ND 193 Highlight: A defendant may appeal a municipal court judgment of conviction to the district court, and the appeal must be taken in accordance with the Rules of Criminal Procedure. |