Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
2861 - 2870 of 12359 results
Sargent County Water Resource District v. Mathews, et al.
2015 ND 277
Highlight: The primary purpose in interpreting a deed is to ascertain and effectuate the grantor's intent. When a deed is unambiguous, the parties' intent is determined from the instrument itself. |
Bye v. Robinette
2015 ND 276
Highlight: Findings of fact must demonstrate that the district court followed the child support guidelines when imputing income. |
Yahna v. Altru Health System
2015 ND 275
Highlight: The presumption of at-will employment may be modified by an employment handbook creating contractual rights to employment, or by the statutory proscription against unlawful age discrimination. |
Rooks v. Robb
2015 ND 274
Highlight: Affidavits must be made on personal knowledge and contain more than conclusory statements to raise a genuine issue of material fact. |
Williamson v. N.D. Dep't of Transportation
2015 ND 273
Highlight: Foundation for the admission of blood test results may be laid by a designee of the director of the state crime lab who has been authorized to sign and certify records. |
Huether, et al. v. Nodak Mutual Ins. Co. (cross-reference w/20150029)
2015 ND 272
Highlight: Insurance coverage for "direct physical loss or damage" is not ambiguous as a matter of law. A district court does not err in finding the ordinary meaning of the phrase does not include loss-of-use coverage. |
State v. Gackle
2015 ND 271 Highlight: Section 39-20-07, N.D.C.C., is not the only method for offering blood test results into evidence. Blood test results may also be admitted under normal evidentiary rules. |
Weigel v. Weigel
2015 ND 270
Highlight: In a divorce proceeding, a district court's valuation and distribution of marital property will not be reversed on appeal unless clearly erroneous. |
Anderson v. Baker, et al.
2015 ND 269 |
Johnson, et al. v. Buskohl Construction, Inc., et al.
2015 ND 268
Highlight: If a district court does not make detailed findings when admitting evidence under the residual exception to hearsay, an appellate court may review the record to determine whether the prerequisites to admissibility have been met. |