Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
2901 - 2910 of 12359 results
State v. Montplaisir
2015 ND 237
Highlight: An information is sufficient if it sets forth the offense in the words of the statute and is specific enough to provide a defendant with notice of the pending charges to enable the defendant to prepare a defense. |
Klein v. Klein
2015 ND 236
Highlight: Under the child support guidelines, "self-employment" means employment that results in an obligor earning income from any business organization or entity which the obligor is, to a significant extent, able to directly or indirectly control. |
State v. Guttormson
2015 ND 235
Highlight: Statements admitted to prove a point other than the truth of the matter asserted are not testimonial hearsay statements. |
State v. Chase
2015 ND 234 Highlight: A trial court does not abuse its discretion by excluding evidence of prior sexual activity between a victim and defendant when the defendant has not provided the required notice of intent to offer such evidence. |
Interest of M.R., a Child (CONFIDENTIAL)
2015 ND 233
Highlight: The juvenile court is not required to second-guess an attorney's statement regarding his client's decision not to appear by telephone at a termination of parental rights trial. |
Norby v. Estate of Kuykendall, et al.
2015 ND 232 Highlight: When a boundary is fixed by a deed at a specified line without reference to the water, the grantee cannot claim accretions beyond that line. |
Greywind v. State
2015 ND 231
Highlight: A district court summarily dismissing a post-conviction relief application under N.D.C.C. 29-32.1-09(1) must rely on information found solely within the application. |
State v. Morales
2015 ND 230
Highlight: A warrantless blood-alcohol test is unreasonable unless it falls within a recognized exception to the warrant requirement. |
Grigg v. Grigg
2015 ND 229 Highlight: Unless the opposing party's counter-affidavits conclusively establish the movant's allegations have no credibility, the district court must accept the truth of the moving party's allegations. |
Keller v. State
2015 ND 228
Highlight: A motion to correct an illegal sentence cannot be used to attack the underlying conviction. |