Opinions

State v. Pogue 2015 ND 211
Docket No.: 20140355
Filing Date: 8/25/2015
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Drugs/Contraband
Author: McEvers, Lisa K. Fair

Highlight: A motion to reconsider does not toll the time for filing a notice of appeal from an order suppressing evidence in a criminal matter.
Under the inventory search exception to the warrant requirement, the State has the burden to show law enforcement's reasons for impounding a vehicle are not only for an investigative function.
Under the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule, good faith is a finding of fact.

Winter v. Solheim, et al. 2015 ND 210
Docket No.: 20140458
Filing Date: 8/25/2015
Case Type: Original Proceeding - Civil - Writ of Certiorari
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: If a small claims court has jurisdiction over the parties and subject matter of an action, a writ of certiorari may not be used to review an alleged erroneous decision by the small claims court.

Olson, et al. v. Alerus Financial Corp., et al. 2015 ND 209
Docket No.: 20150009
Filing Date: 8/25/2015
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Torts (Negligence, Liab., Nuis.)
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: A real estate agent owes fiduciary duties to a client, and the legislature intended to create a private remedy to enforce violations of those duties.

State v. Zacher 2015 ND 208
Docket No.: 20150001
Filing Date: 8/25/2015
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Drugs/Contraband
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: Plain view is a recognized exception to the search warrant requirement, allowing law enforcement officers to seize a clearly incriminating object without a warrant if the officers are lawfully in a position from which they can view an object and the object's incriminating character is immediately apparent.

Matter of J.G. (CONFIDENTIAL)(cross-reference w/20100366 & 20120199) 2015 ND 207
Docket No.: 20140448
Filing Date: 8/25/2015
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Civil Commitment of Sexually Dangerous Individual
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: The least restrictive treatment available for a sexually dangerous individual is initially made by the executive director of the department of human services, but the individual may challenge continued commitment if statutory requirements are being violated.

Interest of Whitetail 2015 ND 206
Docket No.: 20140455
Filing Date: 8/25/2015
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Civil Commitment of Sexually Dangerous Individual
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: A sexually dangerous individual who is committed is to be placed in the least restrictive available treatment facility or program.
The executive director may petition the court to place a committed individual in the community for treatment on an outpatient basis.

Anderson v. WSI 2015 ND 205
Docket No.: 20140346
Filing Date: 8/25/2015
Case Type: Appeal - Administrative - Workers Compensation
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: A vocational rehabilitation plan is appropriate if it meets the statutory requirements and gives the injured worker a reasonable opportunity to obtain substantial gainful employment.
Whether a vocational rehabilitation plan will return an injured worker to substantial gainful employmen must be assessed on the basis of the information WSI had before it at the time it selected the plan.

Moody, et al. v. Sundley 2015 ND 204
Docket No.: 20140408
Filing Date: 8/24/2015
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Real Property
Author: McEvers, Lisa K. Fair

Highlight: All the elements for adverse possession must be satisfied for a claim of adverse possession under any of the statutory provisions, and if any element is not satisfied the possession will not confer title.
A pleading may be impliedly amended by the introduction of evidence which varies the theory of the case and is not relevant to any issue pleaded in the case.

Gray v. Berg 2015 ND 203
Docket No.: 20150040
Filing Date: 8/24/2015
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Torts (Negligence, Liab., Nuis.)
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: A peremptory demand for a change of judge differs from a demand for a change of judge based on bias. Peremptory demands are untimely if filed more than 10 days after notice of assignment or reassignment of a judge for trial of a case, notice that trial had been scheduled, or date of service of an ex parte order in the case signed by the judge against whom the demand is filed. Allegations of bias are not subject to the same time constraints.

Messer, et al. v. B&B Hot Oil Service, Inc., et al. 2015 ND 202
Docket No.: 20150065
Filing Date: 8/17/2015
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Other
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: For negligence claims based on defective products, the focus is on whether or not the conduct of the manufacturer or seller falls below the standard of reasonable care. One who has been injured by a product may seek to hold the manufacturer or seller liable on the theory that the design of the product made it dangerous and, apart from whether it was negligent in its design, negligence is inhered in a failure to warn of the danger.
If the existence of a duty depends on factual determinations, their resolution is for the trier of fact. The appropriate procedure in such cases is for the court to instruct the jury as to the defendant's duty, or absence of duty, if certain facts are found.