Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
3011 - 3020 of 12279 results
|
Rath v. Rath (Cross-ref. w/20130025, 20130184, 20130327 & 20140012)
2015 ND 22 Highlight: A district court order denying Mark Rath's motion to vacate the judgment and orders is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1) and (7). |
|
Winarske v. State (consolidated w/20140113-20140118)
2015 ND 21 Highlight: A district court judgment denying post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
|
Interest of J.A.H. (Consolidated w/20140146)
2015 ND 20 Highlight: When a juvenile court provides insufficient findings to review, jurisdiction may be retained under N.D.R.App.P. 35(a)(3) and the case remanded with instructions that the juvenile court make expedited findings of fact. |
|
State v. Johnson
2015 ND 19 Highlight: A district court order revoking probation and sentencing a defendant is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (7). |
|
Beylund v. Levi
2015 ND 18 Highlight: The implied consent laws do not violate the Fourth Amendment, under the doctrine of unconstitutional conditions. |
|
Disciplinary Board v. Stanley
2015 ND 17 Highlight: Lawyer reprimanded. |
|
Law v. Whittet, et al. (cross-reference w/20130241 & 20140248)
2015 ND 16
Highlight: A district court amended judgment will be reversed and remanded for failure to follow the mandate of the Supreme Court. |
|
Nemec v. Disciplinary Board
2015 ND 15 Highlight: Lawyer reinstatement ordered. |
|
State v. Galvez
2015 ND 14
Highlight: Under the Equal Protection Clause, the use of peremptory challenges to exclude jurors solely on the basis of their gender is unconstitutional. |
|
Mertz v. Mertz
2015 ND 13
Highlight: Comprehensive analysis under the Ruff-Fischer guidelines is emphasized over the disadvantaged spouse doctrine, which has been eliminated. |