Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
3001 - 3010 of 12279 results
|
Runge v. Disciplinary Board
2015 ND 32
Highlight: A violation of the rules of professional conduct must be established by clear and convincing evidence. |
|
State v. Glaser
2015 ND 31
Highlight: When a statutory definition is limited by prefatory language such as "in this title" or "for the purposes of this title," there is an expressly evidenced intent that the definition have no application beyond that act. |
|
Waslaski v. State
2015 ND 30 Highlight: District court judgment denying post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
|
State v. Apland
2015 ND 29
Highlight: A factual challenge made against evidence obtained through an alleged unconstitutional warrantless search, which establishes probable cause in an affidavit used to secure a search warrant, may be considered at an evidentiary hearing. |
|
Mackey v. State (cross-ref. w/20120119, 20100337)
2015 ND 28 Highlight: District court orders denying application for post-conviction relief and denying motion to reopen judgment are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), (4), and (7). |
|
State v. Beylund
2015 ND 27 Highlight: Conviction for driving under the influence of alcohol is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7). |
|
Culver v. Levi
2015 ND 26 Highlight: Appeal from judgment affirming decision of the Department of Transportation to suspend driving privileges for 91 days is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
|
Haugen v. Simmons
2015 ND 25 Highlight: A primary residential responsibility determination is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
|
Interest of D.D. (CONFIDENTIAL)(Cons. w/20140457, 20140465, & 20140466)
2015 ND 24 Highlight: A district court judgment terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
|
Huffman Inc. v. WSI
2015 ND 23 Highlight: A district court judgment affirming an administrative law judge's order finding Huffco's drivers are employees is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(5). |