Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
3011 - 3020 of 12359 results
Broten, et al. v. Broten
2015 ND 127
Highlight: Judicial estoppel is a doctrine designed to protect the integrity of the judicial process by prohibiting a party from assuming inconsistent or contradictory positions during the course of litigation.. |
State v. Lowe
2015 ND 126 Highlight: Denial of a N.D.R.Crim.P. 35(b) motion for reduction of sentence is not appealable. |
Estate of Hogen
2015 ND 125
Highlight: A devisee's right to a decedent's real property is subject to administration by a personal representative, which continues until termination of the personal representative's appointment. |
State v. Kopperud
2015 ND 124 Highlight: A district court may not assess jury expenses to a defendant in a criminal case when the defendant fails to appear for trial. |
Funke, et al. v. Aggregate Construction, Inc., et al. (cross-ref. 20120405)
2015 ND 123
Highlight: Only judgments and decrees which constitute a final judgment of the rights of the parties and certain orders enumerated by statute are appealable. |
Estate of Nelson
2015 ND 122 Highlight: Appellate review is not possible when the rationale of the district court's decision is not clear. |
Carlson, et al. v. GMR Transportation, Inc.
2015 ND 121
Highlight: In a tort action to recover damages for a work-related injury, the employer has the burden of establishing by a preponderance of the evidence the defense that the employer is immune from suit under the workers' compensation act. |
Riak v. State
2015 ND 120
Highlight: Motions for reconsideration of a judgment or order may be treated as motions to alter or amend a judgment or as motions for relief from a judgment or order. |
State v. Matthews
2015 ND 119 Highlight: Criminal judgment is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
White, et al. v. T.P. Motel, L.L.C., et al.
2015 ND 118 Highlight: To intervene as a matter of right, a proposed intervenor must show (1) an interest relating to the subject matter of the litigation; (2) the interest may be impaired as a result of the litigation; and (3) the interest is not adequately protected by an existing party to the litigation. |